Supermicro along with Apple and Amazon refute claims in Bloomberg story
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI), a global leader in enterprise computing, storage, networking solutions and green computing technology, strongly refutes reports that servers it sold to customers contained malicious microchips in the motherboards of those systems.
In an article today, it is alleged that Supermicro motherboards sold to certain customers contained malicious chips on its motherboards in 2015. Supermicro has never found any malicious chips, nor been informed by any customer that such chips have been found.
Each company mentioned in the article (Supermicro,
Supermicro has never been contacted by any government agencies either domestic or foreign regarding the alleged claims.
Supermicro takes all security claims very seriously and makes continuous investments in the security capabilities of their products. The manufacture of motherboards in
SuperMicro to release two Supero X299 motherboards (updated) - 06/02/2017 05:03 PM
Supermicro presented its C7X299-PG at the IT trade show Computex in Taiwan. Much like all Intel board partners Supermicro is cooking up something nice as well. And I do say nice with a reason, as prev...
Review: SuperMicro C7Z270-CG Motherboard - 01/19/2017 10:51 AM
It is the era of the Z270 schipset, and in this article we cover the SuperMicro C7Z270-CG review. It is advertised as a server grade motherboard, but will it deliver in performance, features and aesth...
Review: SuperMicro C7Z170-SQ motherboard - 11/03/2015 10:08 AM
In this review we look at a SuperMicro C7Z170-SQ motherboard from their new Gaming series. SMC is predominantly active in the server market, however they have a new gaming line of consumer grade mainb...
SPARKLE CalibreCUTi Supermicro Computer - 01/19/2010 01:28 PM
Sparkle announced the Calibre CUTi, a revolutionary small form factor PC providing high definition 1080p playback and digital surround sound for a variety of multimedia formats displayed right on a us...
Senior Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 2013-09-27
So lets be careful in how we describe things.
Back on topic.
Next time, "let's be careful" and stay on topic in the first place...
the chance of Bloomberg (or the traditional media) being "fake" with allegations like these is zero
why zero? because every printed story naming names and companies have been triple verified
There's just no logic to back that up. If by "every printed story naming names", you mean the one Bloomberg story that we're talking about, the one that didn't name any names, and you just going on the authors word that everything is super verified and double fact checked with a blue star, then you just missed the point.
The strength of your opinion doesn't ~= fact.
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
That's correct. With few wires, there is only feasible vector of attack. That's flash memory for BIOS or other part. There just 3 additional wires from GND and Vcc are needed.
But their description is so vague that this simple to describe attack vector is very likely out of question.
Senior Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 2013-08-16
Have to say, that if these claims would be so wrong there would be Cease and Desist Order issued already for Bloomberg. Only PR responding and denying it gives it some actual legitimacy. After all someone making false claims about you is enough ground for a lawsuit. Since that has not happened...
Senior Member
Posts: 8199
Joined: 2010-11-16
Have to say, that if these claims would be so wrong there would be Cease and Desist Order issued already for Bloomberg. Only PR responding and denying it gives it some actual legitimacy.
When was the last time you heard of Cease and Desist Order pulled over fake news? Ever...?
After all someone making false claims about you is enough ground for a lawsuit. Since that has not happened...
Lawsuit over what?
Reporting that "according to extensive interviews with government and corporate sources " and quoting people "one official says " is hardly illegal.
Senior Member
Posts: 3255
Joined: 2017-08-18
actually, in cases like these, the chance of Bloomberg (or the traditional media) being "fake" with allegations like these is zero.
why zero? because every printed story naming names and companies have been triple verified to avoid libel.
Bloomberg is first and foremost a business media outlet.
the fact that we've heard from corporate public relations means nothing. if these allegations were false the lawyers would be talking, not P.R. hacks.