Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Master review
Intel Core i9 9900K processor review
Intel Core i7 9700K processor review
Intel Core i5 9600K processor review
MSI MEG Z390 ACE review
ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero review
Crucial P1 M.2 1000GB SSD Review
Corsair Force Series MP510 M.2 SSD Review
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Armor 8G review
ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 8GB review
Spotted: Samsungs Next-Gen PM981 NVMe SSD
If you just purchased a 960 EVO or Pro series NVMEs SSD from Samsung, well Samsung is working on a 980 series already. The new Next-Gen PM981 just appeared online.
Like the new 980 models will be an NVME product with a high layered NAND count. The 980 series have been spotted over at Toms who notes that the new NVMe SSDs appeared on the University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory NVMe Integrator's list. The retail drives are labeled NVMe 97X and 98X.
Samsung would release the two products around the January time frame, using new 64-layer 3-bit per cell V-NAND memory. NVMe drives carry the label PM981 which would be TLC written and thus might become the EVO series.
The new models would make use of a new Samsung Polaris Gen 2 controller are capable of delivering 3,000 MB/s and 3,200 MB/s sequential read speeds (for the 512 GB and 1 TB versions) and 1,800 MB/s and 2,400 MB/s sequential write, respectively. Random 4KB numbers run up to 380,000 IOPS read and 440,000 IOPS write, which is pretty crazy. The photos show a green PCB, these would be the OEM versions.
| Product | PM981 512GB | PM981 1TB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (USD) | $233 | $439 |
| Part Number | MZVLB512HAJQ-0000 | MZVLB1T10HALR-0000 |
| Form Factor | 2280 SS | 2280 SS |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Controller | Samsung Polaris V2 | Samsung Polaris V2 |
| Flash | Samsung 64-Layer TLC | Samsung 64-Layer TLC |
| Sequential Read | 3,000 MB/s | 3,200 MB/s |
| Sequential Write | 1,800 MB/s | 2,400 MB/s |
| Random Read | 270,000 IOPS | 380,000 IOPS |
| Random Write | 420,000 IOPS | 440,000 IOPS |
The specs are so specific as these models appeared at a Vietnamese retailer who actually already listed them at $233 and $439 .
beta-sama
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Joined: 2012-11-14
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Joined: 2012-11-14
#5482133 Posted on: 10/16/2017 10:29 AM
This is a OEM version, the final pruduct will be better, like its was with the SM961 and 960 PRO/EVO
But the bottleneck will be always the processor now with thoses speeds.
Great disappointment I do not see a difference in speed between 981 and 960
This is a OEM version, the final pruduct will be better, like its was with the SM961 and 960 PRO/EVO
But the bottleneck will be always the processor now with thoses speeds.
shamus21
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: 2010-05-23
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: 2010-05-23
#5482160 Posted on: 10/16/2017 12:09 PM
With higher core counts on the Cpu you still do not see much of an improvement. This type of drive / storage is only useful for shifting large blocks of data fast not much use for a OS drive.
With higher core counts on the Cpu you still do not see much of an improvement. This type of drive / storage is only useful for shifting large blocks of data fast not much use for a OS drive.
beta-sama
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Joined: 2012-11-14
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Joined: 2012-11-14
#5482164 Posted on: 10/16/2017 12:34 PM
I agree with you but with frequency OC yes, even with memory OC and tighter timings.
With higher core counts on the Cpu you still do not see much of an improvement.
I agree with you but with frequency OC yes, even with memory OC and tighter timings.
dfsdfs1112
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
#5482183 Posted on: 10/16/2017 01:19 PM
Does this mean new motherboards?
for 980 series
Does this mean new motherboards?
for 980 series
nosirrahx
Senior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 2013-04-05
Senior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 2013-04-05
#5482207 Posted on: 10/16/2017 02:19 PM
Does this mean new motherboards?
for 980 series
No, we won't need new motherboards until PICe gen 4 devices are on the market. If your motherboards supports the 960 then the 980 should be plug and play.
Does this mean new motherboards?
for 980 series
No, we won't need new motherboards until PICe gen 4 devices are on the market. If your motherboards supports the 960 then the 980 should be plug and play.
dfsdfs1112
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
#5482246 Posted on: 10/16/2017 04:51 PM
results are still not very good at 500GB
there is no difference between 960 and 981
I do not understand why they published such bad results for 981
you have to wait for PCIE 4.0 or PCI-E 3.0 X8
No, we won't need new motherboards until PICe gen 4 devices are on the market. If your motherboards supports the 960 then the 980 should be plug and play.
results are still not very good at 500GB
there is no difference between 960 and 981
I do not understand why they published such bad results for 981
you have to wait for PCIE 4.0 or PCI-E 3.0 X8
typhon6657
Senior Member
Posts: 195
Joined: 2013-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 195
Joined: 2013-01-06
#5482399 Posted on: 10/17/2017 03:42 AM
What are you blind? Or you just trolling? I say that's a good ass price for a 1TB nvme pcie ssd. Also the rr iops is 110k more and the sw speed is 600 MB's faster.
Great disappointment I do not see a difference in speed between 981 and 960
What are you blind? Or you just trolling? I say that's a good ass price for a 1TB nvme pcie ssd. Also the rr iops is 110k more and the sw speed is 600 MB's faster.
Emille
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
#5482416 Posted on: 10/17/2017 04:31 AM
I've been waiting for news on the 970/980 ssds for ages.
I've been planning to buy a 2TB 960 but read at the start of august that the new ones might be around the corner but have heard nothing since.
The 950 and 960 were out by this time in the last 2 years so given that there is literally no news so far on the proper 970/980 pro for example...I just wonder how much longer I will have to wait.
I've been waiting for news on the 970/980 ssds for ages.
I've been planning to buy a 2TB 960 but read at the start of august that the new ones might be around the corner but have heard nothing since.
The 950 and 960 were out by this time in the last 2 years so given that there is literally no news so far on the proper 970/980 pro for example...I just wonder how much longer I will have to wait.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11297
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11297
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5482417 Posted on: 10/17/2017 04:44 AM
I've been waiting for news on the 970/980 ssds for ages.
I've been planning to buy a 2TB 960 but read at the start of august that the new ones might be around the corner but have heard nothing since.
The 950 and 960 were out by this time in the last 2 years so given that there is literally no news so far on the proper 970/980 pro for example...I just wonder how much longer I will have to wait.
Most likely Q1 next year.
OEM comes before 980pro by a few months.
I've been waiting for news on the 970/980 ssds for ages.
I've been planning to buy a 2TB 960 but read at the start of august that the new ones might be around the corner but have heard nothing since.
The 950 and 960 were out by this time in the last 2 years so given that there is literally no news so far on the proper 970/980 pro for example...I just wonder how much longer I will have to wait.
Most likely Q1 next year.
OEM comes before 980pro by a few months.
dfsdfs1112
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
#5482432 Posted on: 10/17/2017 06:36 AM
NO I think you're a publicist
1. Who needs 1GB to install a Windows system?
2. I can install RAID0 with 256GB PRO960
And will cost me 50% less and I will get 3000MB / 3000MB
do not forget that the price of 960 went down
What are you blind? Or you just trolling? I say that's a good ass price for a 1TB nvme pcie ssd. Also the rr iops is 110k more and the sw speed is 600 MB's faster.
NO I think you're a publicist
1. Who needs 1GB to install a Windows system?
2. I can install RAID0 with 256GB PRO960
And will cost me 50% less and I will get 3000MB / 3000MB
do not forget that the price of 960 went down
Emille
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
#5482441 Posted on: 10/17/2017 07:04 AM
@dfsdfs1112
Someone is moving the goal posts...and someone who owns a gtx480 is going to raid 2 m.2 sata drives....yeah not happening.
Does your motherboard to match that ancient gpu even have m.2 slots? And if it does, you are going to use likely all of your motherboards m.2 slots just for the smallest capacity boot drive in raid money can buy, what a waste of money.
Drive speeds go up with drive capacity, the 256gb drive is the slowest of them all, also with the lowest rated endurance of them all, why would you raid 2 of the slowest, smallest and lowest endurance drives of the series,l which takes up 2 slots and 2x 4x pci lanes....just for a boot drive.
Gee golly gosh those boot times on that drive that will fit zero games will be mighty impressive. If you are using it for compression or video conversion you might even be able to fit a single short video on it
....oh but in record time of course.
The drives in this article compared to the 960pro 256gb are 440,000 IOPS vs the 85,000 IOPS and 2400gb/s vs 900gb/s write and 3200mb/s vs 2200mb/s
@dfsdfs1112
Someone is moving the goal posts...and someone who owns a gtx480 is going to raid 2 m.2 sata drives....yeah not happening.
Does your motherboard to match that ancient gpu even have m.2 slots? And if it does, you are going to use likely all of your motherboards m.2 slots just for the smallest capacity boot drive in raid money can buy, what a waste of money.
Drive speeds go up with drive capacity, the 256gb drive is the slowest of them all, also with the lowest rated endurance of them all, why would you raid 2 of the slowest, smallest and lowest endurance drives of the series,l which takes up 2 slots and 2x 4x pci lanes....just for a boot drive.
Gee golly gosh those boot times on that drive that will fit zero games will be mighty impressive. If you are using it for compression or video conversion you might even be able to fit a single short video on it
....oh but in record time of course.The drives in this article compared to the 960pro 256gb are 440,000 IOPS vs the 85,000 IOPS and 2400gb/s vs 900gb/s write and 3200mb/s vs 2200mb/s
Skylinestar
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2017-10-19
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2017-10-19
#5483246 Posted on: 10/19/2017 06:23 AM
Any improvement in thermal / heat tolerant?
Any improvement in thermal / heat tolerant?
dfsdfs1112
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
#5483453 Posted on: 10/19/2017 06:45 PM
@dfsdfs1112
Someone is moving the goal posts...and someone who owns a gtx480 is going to raid 2 m.2 sata drives....yeah not happening.
Does your motherboard to match that ancient gpu even have m.2 slots? And if it does, you are going to use likely all of your motherboards m.2 slots just for the smallest capacity boot drive in raid money can buy, what a waste of money.
Drive speeds go up with drive capacity, the 256gb drive is the slowest of them all, also with the lowest rated endurance of them all, why would you raid 2 of the slowest, smallest and lowest endurance drives of the series,l which takes up 2 slots and 2x 4x pci lanes....just for a boot drive.
Gee golly gosh those boot times on that drive that will fit zero games will be mighty impressive. If you are using it for compression or video conversion you might even be able to fit a single short video on it....oh but in record time of course.
The drives in this article compared to the 960pro 256gb are 440,000 IOPS vs the 85,000 IOPS and 2400gb/s vs 900gb/s write and 3200mb/s vs 2200mb/s
You write endless nonsense
1. i do not have gtx480 ! i have 480 AMD
2. I'm looking to buy a new computer
3. you Just proving me 960PRO is still more worthwhile
@dfsdfs1112
Someone is moving the goal posts...and someone who owns a gtx480 is going to raid 2 m.2 sata drives....yeah not happening.
Does your motherboard to match that ancient gpu even have m.2 slots? And if it does, you are going to use likely all of your motherboards m.2 slots just for the smallest capacity boot drive in raid money can buy, what a waste of money.
Drive speeds go up with drive capacity, the 256gb drive is the slowest of them all, also with the lowest rated endurance of them all, why would you raid 2 of the slowest, smallest and lowest endurance drives of the series,l which takes up 2 slots and 2x 4x pci lanes....just for a boot drive.
Gee golly gosh those boot times on that drive that will fit zero games will be mighty impressive. If you are using it for compression or video conversion you might even be able to fit a single short video on it
....oh but in record time of course.The drives in this article compared to the 960pro 256gb are 440,000 IOPS vs the 85,000 IOPS and 2400gb/s vs 900gb/s write and 3200mb/s vs 2200mb/s
You write endless nonsense
1. i do not have gtx480 ! i have 480 AMD
2. I'm looking to buy a new computer
3. you Just proving me 960PRO is still more worthwhile
dfsdfs1112
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
#5484005 Posted on: 10/21/2017 01:04 PM
Intel to launch second-gen Optane 900P SSDs very soon
Read more: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/59462/intel-launch-second-gen-optane-900p-ssds-very-soon/index.html
Less well than 960 PRO ?
Intel to launch second-gen Optane 900P SSDs very soon
Read more: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/59462/intel-launch-second-gen-optane-900p-ssds-very-soon/index.html
Less well than 960 PRO ?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2016-08-27
Great disappointment I do not see a difference in speed between 981 and 960