Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
Spotted: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Processor with 8-channel DDR4
Well, here's something new and unexpected. It seems AMD is prepping a Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Processor with 64-cores/128 threads and wait for it ... 8-channel DDR4 memory support.
A photo of the product surfaced on the Chiphell forums, but shortly after that was removed. As a pro series the processor is needs to compete with Xeon W series processors in that SOHO environment. The big news is that the Asia website reported the 3995WX is an offering 8-channel DDR4 memory interface, up to 2 TB of it The Ryzen Threadripper PRO series might see the light of day as soon as next week, July 14, 2020.
Core i7-10700F CineBench Scores spotted: lets chart that up - 02/19/2020 03:44 PM
Intel's Core i7-10700F has been spotted, the 8-core/16-thread processor that is multiplier locked. It has a base clock of 2.90 GHz, and lacks integrated graphics "F" extension. ...
AMD Ryzen 5 3500 spotted: Six Cores but no SMT (updated) - 09/25/2019 08:39 AM
From the looks of things, AMD is to complement its Ryzen 3000 line-up with another six-core. The Ryzen 5 3500 is running 3.6 GHz for a base clock with a 4.1 Ghz Turbo, it, however, lacks Hyperthreadi...
Spotted: custom PowerColor Radeon RX 5700 Red Devil - 08/05/2019 08:58 AM
We've almost seen them all fly by, but aside from a price announcement we had not seen the PowerColor Radeon RX 5700 Custom Radeon RX 5700 (XT). ...
Spotted: Ryzen 3000 Six core proc with 3.2 GHz faster than Ryzen 7 2700X - 05/26/2019 05:59 PM
A leaked geekbench entry is making rounds this weekend, a six-kernel Ryzen 3000 was spotted, presumably the new entry-level processor from AMD. It seems it has a higher single-core performance than t...
Energy Friendly AMD Ryzen 7 2700E spotted: 8-cores and 45 watts TDP - 07/08/2018 09:49 AM
AMD will be releasing a low(er)-power slash more energy friendly AMD Ryzen 7 2700E. This eight-core proc would get a pretty sweet 45 Watt TDP, which obviously means it has a lower base clock and lowe...
ZXRaziel
Senior Member
Posts: 423
Joined: 2017-12-11
Senior Member
Posts: 423
Joined: 2017-12-11
#5806957 Posted on: 07/08/2020 09:05 PM
Beastly cpu , would be fun to play with this bad boy .
Beastly cpu , would be fun to play with this bad boy .
nosirrahx
Senior Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 2013-04-05
Senior Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 2013-04-05
#5806999 Posted on: 07/08/2020 11:33 PM
Maximum supported RAM on a HEDT platform. Clearly Intel does no compete in terms of price or threads.
That stupidly expensive Mac would be even less impressive if you could build a Threadripper workstation with 2TB of RAM.
How did Intel kick AMD's ass
Maximum supported RAM on a HEDT platform. Clearly Intel does no compete in terms of price or threads.
That stupidly expensive Mac would be even less impressive if you could build a Threadripper workstation with 2TB of RAM.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5807003 Posted on: 07/08/2020 11:58 PM
Maximum supported RAM on a HEDT platform. Clearly Intel does no compete in terms of price or threads.
That stupidly expensive Mac would be even less impressive if you could build a Threadripper workstation with 2TB of RAM.
It's winning in an irrelevant way. You don't need 2TB on an 18-core workstation CPU, and like I said before, if you need that much RAM on AMD, just go Epyc.
Maximum supported RAM on a HEDT platform. Clearly Intel does no compete in terms of price or threads.
That stupidly expensive Mac would be even less impressive if you could build a Threadripper workstation with 2TB of RAM.
It's winning in an irrelevant way. You don't need 2TB on an 18-core workstation CPU, and like I said before, if you need that much RAM on AMD, just go Epyc.
nosirrahx
Senior Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 2013-04-05
Senior Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 2013-04-05
#5807013 Posted on: 07/09/2020 12:52 AM
If the prices were comparable then you would have a point. Just the Epyc CPU and motherboard are more expensive than an entire threadripper build.
Even allowing 1TB on the 64 core threadripper would have made for one hell of a workstation.
It's winning in an irrelevant way. You don't need 2TB on an 18-core workstation CPU, and like I said before, if you need that much RAM on AMD, just go Epyc.
If the prices were comparable then you would have a point. Just the Epyc CPU and motherboard are more expensive than an entire threadripper build.
Even allowing 1TB on the 64 core threadripper would have made for one hell of a workstation.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
How did Intel kick AMD's ass when they don't have a product that comes anywhere close to competing? Although the 256GB limit is a bit anemic, if you need more memory, that's what Epyc is for. The 7702P is about $600 more expensive but you get double the memory bandwidth, double the usable PCIe lanes, and 2TB of RAM. If you really need that full capacity, that's going to cost you roughly $2500 of just RAM. Pinching pennies when we're talking 128 threads is a bit weird.
The 3990X is more of a "because we can" CPU to kick dirt in Intel's face, because most sensible people would never seriously consider getting it unless they really had no use for more RAM. The price and limited memory capacity make it incredibly niche.
All that being said, I'm having a hard time understanding the purpose of the 3995WX. It has to be at least a couple hundred dollars more expensive than the 3990X, so, why not just go for Epyc at that point?