Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor review

New Downloads
CPU-Z download v2.04
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4090
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.36
MSI Afterburner 4.6.5 (Beta 4) Download


New Forum Topics
Microsoft halts selling Windows 10 on January 31 AMD Polaris (RX 400/500) users unable to play Forspoken NVIDIA GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download & Discussion Afterburner won't save screenshots or video Crash 0xc0000005 (3221225477) in Red dead redemption 2(solution found) Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.11.2 - Driver download and discussion Is unstable USB a known issue with x570 boards and is there a fix? Sony Bravia fix will be included in the driver after next. AMD Fluid Motion feature?




Guru3D.com » News » Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel

Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/23/2018 04:54 PM | source: Sony | 21 comment(s)
Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel

Sony announced a camera sensor for smartphones with a staggering 48-megapixel resolution, that would be a photo of 8000x6000 pixels. The new product achieved compact pixel size of 0.8 μm, making it possible to pack 48 effective megapixels onto a 1/2-type (8.0 mm diagonal) unit, thereby supporting enhanced imaging on smartphone cameras.

The new Sony sensor features 48 effective megapixels, a pixel count which rivals that of high-performance SLR cameras, making it possible to capture high-resolution images even with a smartphone.

The new sensor uses the Quad Bayer color filter array, where adjacent 2x2 pixels come in the same color, making high-sensitivity shooting possible. During low light shooting, the signals from the four adjacent pixels are added, raising the sensitivity to a level equivalent to that of 1.6 μm pixels (12 megapixels), resulting in bright, low noise images.
In addition to these advantages, original Sony exposure control technology and signal processing functionality are built into the image sensor, enabling real-time output and a superior dynamic range four times greater than conventional units. Even scenes with both bright and dark areas can be captured with minimal highlight blowout or loss of detail in shadows. Generally, miniaturization of pixels results in poor light collecting efficiency per pixel, accompanied by a drop in sensitivity and volume of saturation signal. This product was designed and manufactured with techniques that improve light collection efficiency and photoelectric conversion efficiency over conventional products, resulting in the world’s first 0.8 μm pixel size, with both high sensitivity and high saturation signal level. This smaller pixel size allows the new product to deliver 48 effective megapixels on a compact unit with 8.0 mm diagonal, which can be fitted on many smartphones. The increased pixel count enables high-definition imaging even on smartphones which use digital zoom.

By adopting the Quad Bayer color filter array, where the adjacent 2x2 pixels come in the same color, the new sensor delivers both high sensitivity and high resolution. In low light situations, such as shooting at night, the signal from the four adjacent pixels are added, raising the sensitivity to a level equivalent to that of 1.6 μm pixels (12 effective megapixels), to capture bright, low-noise photos and videos. When shooting bright scenes such as daytime outdoors, the built-in, original signal processing function performs array conversion, making it possible to obtain high-definition 48 effective megapixel images in real time.



Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel




« GeForce GTX 1180 announced late August - 1180+, 1170 and 1160 to follow · Sony Releases new IMX586 smartphone sensor - 48 megapixel · Intel Core i9-9900K, i7-9700K, i5-9600K specifications exposed (updated) »

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


fry178
Senior Member



Posts: 1920
Joined: 2012-04-30

#5567825 Posted on: 07/24/2018 10:37 PM
@DLD
And i have yet to see an non full frame 6MP camera with a 5000$ lens that takes better pics than lets say an a6300 with stock lens.
To a certain degree, MP DO matter.

@Silva
Because they dont want to sacrifice overall performance by having one cam doing everything "mediocre".
The a7 is the regular one, the R is for resolution (40 vs 24MP) and S is for sensitivity (12MP and 400000 iso).

And as far as screen goes, everything up to 20MP i can tell the difference between 4/8/12/20 on any 55/65 4k tv i have in the shop..
As soon as you look at details and especially plants/trees.
Given that we are not talking about pro grade cam/lens.

They have different chips, as they use different sizes (chip) and sometimes older ones (16/20MP), and lower resolution sensors to improve low light performance, which is more important than res on video, especially since 4K needs only 8MP, which will also help quality a bit,
as the sensor isnt maxed out.
Most cams improve a bit going with resolution below the top one (e.g. 16/18/20 vs 18/20/24).

Aura89
Senior Member



Posts: 8361
Joined: 2008-07-31

#5567838 Posted on: 07/24/2018 11:37 PM

It's marketing, more MP doesn't mean a better image,

More MP doesn't necessarily mean a better image, you are correct, but it does mean it captures more data, more detail, and that is important. Even viewing a very large picture on a smaller screen will utilize that extra data in the best way possible, you'll get less blurryness. Again, that doesn't mean the quality will be any better, like you said, but more data is never bad. it also allows you much better control over making a digital picture into a physical picture. I have seen people take pictures for an event and want it on a banner, feet long and high etc. And though it looks good on their phone, it looks pixelated when printed, ESPECIALLY if it has to be cropped.

Plus, it also allows you to take pictures, and crop stuff out of those pictures and still retain the detail since you have so much information to make it work

If i had a low pixel device i would not have been able to get this decent of a picture of these yellowjackets without having to use the macro or install a macro lense and get up very close to the bees i had no desire to get closer to. Though if i had done that i could have captured even more detail, ofcourse, but there's not a huge lack of detail here.



Clawedge
Senior Member



Posts: 2599
Joined: 2006-09-02

#5567845 Posted on: 07/25/2018 12:06 AM
i think they are hornets/wasps

Aura89
Senior Member



Posts: 8361
Joined: 2008-07-31

#5567859 Posted on: 07/25/2018 01:08 AM
i think they are hornets/wasps

Yellowjackets i believe, which is what i meant to type, haha

Silva
Senior Member



Posts: 1962
Joined: 2013-06-04

#5568359 Posted on: 07/26/2018 01:05 PM
@fry178
I know what each a7 is for, that's why I gave their example.
I agree with you that for a big TV you'd notice sharpness differences. But for monitors below 32'' not so much.
It's a phone we are talking about, not a cinema camera.

@aura89
I would prefer better low light performance over detail on a mobile device, or any camera at all.
To capture detail, you need to have control of the light. As an amateur, I almost never have.
You need to think about who uses this technology: pros who pixel peep, or amateurs who just wanna snap a couple pictures?
Beautiful pic btw, but if you want detail: fill the frame with the subject aka use a bigger lens.
Oh, wait: you used a phone? You can't ever get DSLR/Mirrorless quality on a phone, it's not possible due to space and lack of lens.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023