ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
Sniper Elite 4: PC graphics and benchmark review
We check out Sniper Elite 4 for PC, the title has been released today and has a few nice tricks up its sleeves. The game is DirectX 12 compatible and has ASYNC Compute support, let's go check out a graphics card or seventeen with this game to see how well it performs.
Read the full review here.
Sniper Elite 4 will get DirectX 12 support - 02/06/2017 06:25 PM
Rebellion has just announced that the PC version of Sniper Elite 4 will support Microsoft’s latest API, DirectX 12. According to the team, DX12 can take things even further for Rebellion&a...
Sniper Elite 4 Italy 1943 Story Trailer - 12/07/2016 06:25 AM
Italy, Second World War. Explore the Allied invasion plans and discover the covert operations behind Sniper Elite 4's breathtaking campaign. Featuring beautiful concept art and new in-game factions a...
Sniper Elite 4 Gameplay Trailer - 09/22/2016 08:33 AM
Preorders are now underway for Sniper Elite 4, the upcoming sharpshooting sequel. Rebellion announces that preorders will include a free copy of their Target Führer DLC and additional content for Win...
Sniper Elite 4 E3 2016 Demo - 06/17/2016 09:29 AM
Here's a new video, showcasing 10 minutes of gameplay footage from the E3 2016 demo of Sniper Elite 4. The game is currently scheduled for a February 14th release. ...
Rebellion has announced Sniper Elite 4 for PC (video) - 03/08/2016 09:15 AM
Rebellion has announced that Sniper Elite 4 is heading to PlayStation 4, Xbox One and PC through Steam in 2016....
coth
Senior Member
Posts: 554
Joined: 2005-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 554
Joined: 2005-02-23
#5392730 Posted on: 02/14/2017 02:53 PM
Didn't know there were electronic glasses and HMD systems in WWII...
Didn't know there were electronic glasses and HMD systems in WWII...
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 14291
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 14291
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5392733 Posted on: 02/14/2017 02:55 PM
Interesting fact on the CPU side. This game performs better on a 6c/6t than 4c/8t CPUs.
One more reason to wait for Ryzen.
Or that finally one of the devs makes use of the hexacores that have been around with Intel for so long
But yeah, first fps that I've seen that seems to like more than four cores for some real advantages.
Interesting fact on the CPU side. This game performs better on a 6c/6t than 4c/8t CPUs.
One more reason to wait for Ryzen.
Or that finally one of the devs makes use of the hexacores that have been around with Intel for so long
But yeah, first fps that I've seen that seems to like more than four cores for some real advantages.
darrensimmons
Senior Member
Posts: 1684
Joined: 2011-03-01
Senior Member
Posts: 1684
Joined: 2011-03-01
#5392737 Posted on: 02/14/2017 03:04 PM
Yes indeed it does and it's faster than dx11 sli.
Does this title support Dx12 MultiGPU for Nvidia cards?
Yes indeed it does and it's faster than dx11 sli.
TheHeavySoldier
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-03-25
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-03-25
#5392746 Posted on: 02/14/2017 03:14 PM
1440p
GTX Titan X - 116
GTX 1080 - 90
GTX 1070 - 72
R9 Fury X - 71
GTX 980ti - 67
R9 Fury - 66
R9 Nano - 63
4k
GTX Titan X - 72
GTX 1080 - 55
R9 Fury X - 49
R9 Fury - 45
R9 Nano - 42
GTX 980ti - 42
GTX 1070 - 40
How exactly do the cards with more than 4GB jump ahead?
The GTX 1080 and GTX Titan X were already on top. The GTX 1070 (8GB) dropped below the R9 Nano (4GB), the R9 Fury (4GB) jumped ahead of the 980ti (6GB) and both the R9 Fury (4GB) and R9 Fury X (4GB) jumped ahead of the GTX 1070 (8GB).
Not to mention the R9 Fury is 100 euros cheaper than the GTX 1070 (both, cheapest versions available, Sapphire Nitro fury for 330 euros and KFA2 GTX 1070 for 429 euros)
That conclusion makes no sense at all...
1440p
GTX Titan X - 116
GTX 1080 - 90
GTX 1070 - 72
R9 Fury X - 71
GTX 980ti - 67
R9 Fury - 66
R9 Nano - 63
4k
GTX Titan X - 72
GTX 1080 - 55
R9 Fury X - 49
R9 Fury - 45
R9 Nano - 42
GTX 980ti - 42
GTX 1070 - 40
Ultra HD, UHD or 4K, this resolution refers to approximately 4000 horizontal pixels. Ultra HD resolution has four times the number of pixels of a typical 1920x1080 resolution. This resolution and Ultra quality settings require more memory, hence the cards with more then 4 GB jump ahead. Proper framerates you will achieve with a GeForce GTX 1070. But as we see so often, the Hawaii GPUs aka Radeon R9 390 series certainly still are going strong.
How exactly do the cards with more than 4GB jump ahead?
The GTX 1080 and GTX Titan X were already on top. The GTX 1070 (8GB) dropped below the R9 Nano (4GB), the R9 Fury (4GB) jumped ahead of the 980ti (6GB) and both the R9 Fury (4GB) and R9 Fury X (4GB) jumped ahead of the GTX 1070 (8GB).
Not to mention the R9 Fury is 100 euros cheaper than the GTX 1070 (both, cheapest versions available, Sapphire Nitro fury for 330 euros and KFA2 GTX 1070 for 429 euros)
That conclusion makes no sense at all...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9597
Joined: 2006-10-29
Great review Hilbert. Good to see a title where both camps nvidia and amd video cards do benefit from DX12 and Async compute. This game loves more cores on the cpu side of things , hence 6 core or 8 core CPUs it's the way to go the way i see it. More and more new games do benefit from that , hence in my opinion for people upgrading soon need to understand the sweet spot is 6c12t or 8c12t cpu if you really want to be future proof do not go the 4 core route.