Patriot Viper V765 Keyboard Review
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: RTX and DLSS Update
ASUS RT-AX88U (AX6000) router review
The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
URCDkey Spring Sale(up to 86% off) Windows 10 Pro $11
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X review
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OC review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
Corsair Crystal 680X PC Chassis Review
Corsair Carbide 678C review
Seagate Technology Launches 6TB HDD
With enterprise reliability and NAS optimized performance in up to 16-bays, the Enterprise NAS drive is available in capacities up to an industry-leading 6TB, and is designed to perform at high levels even under demanding workloads and in environments that call for global availability and 24x7 accessibility.
"As the industry moves deeper into the cloud era, all businesses need solutions that enable applications to be accessed anywhere at any time," said Scott Horn, Seagate vice president of marketing. "With our portfolio of NAS products, we can effectively target the needs of all types of businesses and scale with them as they grow in size. These drives are tailored to the requirements of businesses, ensuring customers have choices so they are only paying for the features they need."
Available in 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6TB capacities, Seagate Enterprise NAS HDD can deliver up to 96TBs in one 16-bay rackmount or tower form factor. With a 50 percent capacity advantage over competitive offerings, the Enterprise NAS HDD 6TB drive delivers the highest capacity available on the market. Using RV sensor technology, the Enterprise NAS HDD can also sustain performance streaming and random read/write workloads for growing business data needs, intrinsically adjusting and compensating based on usage.
"QNAP constantly strives to provide business users with reliable and scalable NAS solutions for storage, backup, iSCSI and virtualization applications, and many other practical business applications," said Meiji Chang, general manager of QNAP Systems, Inc. "Seagate's Enterprise NAS HDD allows us to deliver a compelling and cost-effective NAS offering that meets the capacity, performance, availability and reliability requirements of our end customers."
In the event of a failure, be it environmental, human error, or accident, the Enterprise NAS HDD is supported by Seagate's own Rescue Data Recovery plans (optional), which provide end-to-end protection enabling industry-leading data recovery with more than a 90 percent success rate. The plans also cover NAS HDDs targeting the SOHO and prosumer NAS market and Surveillance HDDs targeting video surveillance systems.
Seagate Enterprise NAS HDD key features include:
- Rescue Data Recovery options for that extra peace of mind
- 5 year limited warranty for long-term protection
- RAID Rebuild technology for reduced downtime
- Error Recovery Control for data accuracy and protection
- RV Sensor for detecting and compensating for vibrational disturbances
- 7200-RPM
Seagate Ships 8 TB Hard Drives - 08/26/2014 02:15 PM
Dang ! Seagate today announced it is shipping the world's first 8 TB hard disk drive. An important step forward in storage, the 8 TB hard disk drive provides scale-out data infrastructures with supe...
Seagate is Sampling 8TB HDDs - 07/21/2014 11:30 AM
Got storage needs ? Well good news as Seagate is sampling partners their first colossal in storage volume 8TB HDDs. During Seagate’s earnings call last week, CEO Steve Luczo let investors ...
Seagate Ships 6 TB Hard Drive doing 7200 RPM - 04/07/2014 02:59 PM
Seagate announced it is now shipping the world's fastest 6 TB hard disk drive (HDD) - the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 HDD v4. Boasting industry-leading performance, the Enterprise Capacity 3.5 HD...
Seagate Backup Plus Fast - 04/07/2014 06:10 AM
Seagate introduced Backup Plus FAST portable drive; the world's first portable 4TB storage device, providing twice the capacity and speed of existing external portable drives. This new Seagate Backup...
Seagate Releases 7th Generation Surveillence HDD - 02/25/2014 08:54 AM
Seagate today released its seventh-generation hard drive disk (HDD) engineered specifically for surveillance and video analytics applications- the Seagate Surveillance HDD. The Surveillance HDD is a w...
Speed Weed
Senior Member
Posts: 1066
Joined: 2011-12-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1066
Joined: 2011-12-04
#4971135 Posted on: 12/03/2014 10:44 AM
Anyone else still remember when a 100Mb hard Drive was considered large enough for anyone's needs?
But that was back in the days of elegant coding, when every byte counted, and no storage space wasted.
Read on one of the other threads a couple of days ago that some coders are putting games within games.
Mind you, back then a 100Mb HD did cost as much as a 3Tb HD does today, and so I'm not going to grumble at all.
Anyone else still remember when a 100Mb hard Drive was considered large enough for anyone's needs?
But that was back in the days of elegant coding, when every byte counted, and no storage space wasted.
Read on one of the other threads a couple of days ago that some coders are putting games within games.
Mind you, back then a 100Mb HD did cost as much as a 3Tb HD does today, and so I'm not going to grumble at all.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6562
Joined: 2010-11-16
Senior Member
Posts: 6562
Joined: 2010-11-16
#4971138 Posted on: 12/03/2014 10:56 AM
^^ In the words of my professor:
Every fool is using double precision nowadays /shakes head
^^ In the words of my professor:
Every fool is using double precision nowadays /shakes head
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2007-05-31
#4971157 Posted on: 12/03/2014 12:11 PM
i remember when 40Mb was a huge volume
i was student and had a 286 card in my Amiga 2000 (btw what a great computer).
when i look at my 6To nas that is too small right now...
Wow i feel old now lol
Anyone else still remember when a 100Mb hard Drive was considered large enough for anyone's needs?
i remember when 40Mb was a huge volume
i was student and had a 286 card in my Amiga 2000 (btw what a great computer).
when i look at my 6To nas that is too small right now...
Wow i feel old now lol
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 804
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 804
Joined: 2014-07-22
#4971464 Posted on: 12/03/2014 11:26 PM
i remember when 40Mb was a huge volume i was student and had a 286 card in my Amiga 2000 (btw what a great computer).
when i look at my 6To nas that is too small right now...
Wow i feel old now lol
My very first HD was a Great Valley Products(TM) 40MB scsi in an Amiga 2000...that set me back a cool 500 clams...!...
Along with everything else, how times have changed! (Yes, the Amiga was fabulous in its day...easily a decade ahead of single-tasking monochrome Macs and 4-color CGA PCs with beeps for sound..!)
i remember when 40Mb was a huge volume
i was student and had a 286 card in my Amiga 2000 (btw what a great computer).
when i look at my 6To nas that is too small right now...
Wow i feel old now lol
My very first HD was a Great Valley Products(TM) 40MB scsi in an Amiga 2000...that set me back a cool 500 clams...!...
Along with everything else, how times have changed! (Yes, the Amiga was fabulous in its day...easily a decade ahead of single-tasking monochrome Macs and 4-color CGA PCs with beeps for sound..!)
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 804
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 804
Joined: 2014-07-22
#4971473 Posted on: 12/03/2014 11:40 PM
Anyone else still remember when a 100Mb hard Drive was considered large enough for anyone's needs?
But that was back in the days of elegant coding, when every byte counted, and no storage space wasted.
Read on one of the other threads a couple of days ago that some coders are putting games within games.
Mind you, back then a 100Mb HD did cost as much as a 3Tb HD does today, and so I'm not going to grumble at all.
Well, you have to also consider how small the average program size was at the time...not necessarily because it was coded in assembly, either. Back then programs could only access by-comparison tiny amounts of ram, and they simply did not require much space at all...I remember well one particular quote from an EA developer at the time (long before EA turned into what it is now...50% populated with nitwits...), he said he could not imagine developing a program large enough to fit on a single 1.44MB floppy disk...!...
All things are relative...games today, for instance, ship with GB's of textures which are loaded onto gpus with GB's of on-board, local ram... Resolutions are far higher, etc. & etc.
Back then (as well as today), nothing stressed your hardware--allowed you to push its limits--like game software. It's the one thing that allows us to "get our money's worth" with the hardware we buy--Internet browsers and word processors certainly don't...Today, too, the software market is exponentially bigger and there are far, far more programs that people can choose from than existed in, say, 1987, or 1992, etc. And now people have the room to install and run them; whereas back then they didn't.
Yea, sure, some of it is inefficiency, bloat, and waste--but a lot of that is strictly in the eye of the beholder. No way would I trade the power and capability I have today for the so-called "efficiency" of yesteryear...but that's just me...
Anyone else still remember when a 100Mb hard Drive was considered large enough for anyone's needs?
But that was back in the days of elegant coding, when every byte counted, and no storage space wasted.
Read on one of the other threads a couple of days ago that some coders are putting games within games.
Mind you, back then a 100Mb HD did cost as much as a 3Tb HD does today, and so I'm not going to grumble at all.
Well, you have to also consider how small the average program size was at the time...not necessarily because it was coded in assembly, either. Back then programs could only access by-comparison tiny amounts of ram, and they simply did not require much space at all...I remember well one particular quote from an EA developer at the time (long before EA turned into what it is now...50% populated with nitwits...), he said he could not imagine developing a program large enough to fit on a single 1.44MB floppy disk...!...
All things are relative...games today, for instance, ship with GB's of textures which are loaded onto gpus with GB's of on-board, local ram...
Resolutions are far higher, etc. & etc.
Back then (as well as today), nothing stressed your hardware--allowed you to push its limits--like game software. It's the one thing that allows us to "get our money's worth" with the hardware we buy--Internet browsers and word processors certainly don't...Today, too, the software market is exponentially bigger and there are far, far more programs that people can choose from than existed in, say, 1987, or 1992, etc. And now people have the room to install and run them; whereas back then they didn't.
Yea, sure, some of it is inefficiency, bloat, and waste--but a lot of that is strictly in the eye of the beholder. No way would I trade the power and capability I have today for the so-called "efficiency" of yesteryear...but that's just me...
leefuji
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2009-09-23
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2009-09-23
#4971487 Posted on: 12/04/2014 12:42 AM
I'm the sure the good folks at Backblaze are getting ready for their next beast build, 2 months ago they were waiting for prices to drop a bit first to test a few units with 6TB's.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage-2/
Storage POD 4.0:
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-storage-pod-4/
I'm the sure the good folks at Backblaze are getting ready for their next beast build, 2 months ago they were waiting for prices to drop a bit first to test a few units with 6TB's.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage-2/
Storage POD 4.0:
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-storage-pod-4/
ManofGod
Senior Member
Posts: 1289
Joined: 2004-12-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1289
Joined: 2004-12-10
#4973330 Posted on: 12/08/2014 04:55 AM
I want my Amiga 500 with side expansion, 4MB of ram and 40MB SCSI hard drive again.
I loved that computer the most of any I have ever owned.
My very first HD was a Great Valley Products(TM) 40MB scsi in an Amiga 2000...that set me back a cool 500 clams...!... Along with everything else, how times have changed! (Yes, the Amiga was fabulous in its day...easily a decade ahead of single-tasking monochrome Macs and 4-color CGA PCs with beeps for sound..!)
Along with everything else, how times have changed! (Yes, the Amiga was fabulous in its day...easily a decade ahead of single-tasking monochrome Macs and 4-color CGA PCs with beeps for sound..!)I want my Amiga 500 with side expansion, 4MB of ram and 40MB SCSI hard drive again.
I loved that computer the most of any I have ever owned.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6562
Joined: 2010-11-16
How's this for reliability
2x 120 GB Seagate ST3120026AS, Power-On Hours > 80,000
I bought them around 2000., and ran them pretty much 24/7.
Their manual reads:
Mean time between failures (power-on hours): 600,000
Service life: 5 years
Quick calculation:
(600,000 - 80,000)/80,000 x 14(disks age) = 91 years left in them