ASUS ROG STRIX XG279Q Monitor Review
MSI MEG Z490 UNIFY review
Sabrent Rocket NVMe 4.0 1TB NVMe SSD review
Gigabyte Z490 VISION G review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - May 2020
Lamptron HM101 review
Lexar SL100 Pro Portable SSD 500 GB review
ASUS ROG Maximus XII Hero review
Intel Core i9-10900K processor review
Intel Core i5-10600K processor review
Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 64 Card SKU names surface
Website elchapuzasinformatico in the past has been pretty spot on with information that should not be out there. This round they apparently stumbled into three Sapphire Radeon RX Vega cards.
From what we can derrive from the information, there will be two cooling solutions for Vega cards, liquid (LCS) and obviously air-cooled ones. Sapphire seems to be releasing three models:
- SAPPHIRE RADEON RX VEGA 64 8G HBM2 HDMI + TRIPLE DP, LIQUID COOLING 2048-bits - Water Cooler
- SAPPHIRE RADEON RX VEGA 64 8G HBM2 HDMI + TRIPLE DP LIMITED EDITION 2048-bit - 2 slot active
- SAPPHIRE RADEON RX VEGA 64 8G HBM2 HDMI + TRIPLE DP 2048-bit - 2 slot active
The Limited edition probably is a higher clocked edition. We cannot really verify this information whatsoever, however it would make no sense to make up naming like that. RadeoN RX Vega 64.If you think that "64" suffix is a little weird, it isn't really when you think about it. A full Vega chip has 64 shader processor clusters with 64 shader processors each = 4096 shader processors.
There is more info though, El Chapuzas mentions a 699 Euro and 899 Euro pricing in-between the cheapest and that liquid cooled edition. That would be ex VAT here in the EU with prices roughly similar in USD. El Chapuzas states that their source is reliable. As always take news like this with a grain of salt, but looking at the naming schema, it would not surprize me if it is correct.
AMD will make formal announcements next week.
Sapphire Adds Radeon RX 560 PULSE to Lineup - 05/19/2017 08:23 AM
Sapphire has added its Radeon RX 560 PULSE to their Lineup. The card series is slowly getting available and reached the amrket in that $100 price segment....
BYKSKI Offers Waterblock for Sapphire RX580 NITRO+ - 05/10/2017 09:54 AM
Asia region based BYKSKI released the A-SP58PLAT-X water block for Sapphire RX580 NITRO+ edition. The A-SP58PLAT-X full cover water block is based on pure copper of the metal part....
Sapphire introduces PULSE graphics card family - 04/21/2017 08:14 AM
Sapphire announced a new family of products in its consumer graphics cards business - Sapphire Pulse. Focusing on what matters most for PC gamers, Pulse is a combination of performance, durability...
Review: Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Nitro+ 4GB - 04/18/2017 03:00 PM
This review covers the Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Nitro+ graphics card. This Nitro+ edition has a massive cooling block slapped on top of it. And while the GPU is similar to that of the Radeon RX 470, a h...
AccelStor Announces Flagship All-Flash Array The NeoSapphire P710 - 12/09/2016 07:39 AM
AccelStore is thrilled to announce the next generation NeoSapphire P710, its latest flagship all-flash array. The P710 pushes performance to a new level: over 700K IOPS for 4KB random writes....
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9598
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9598
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5456219 Posted on: 07/27/2017 05:57 PM
If that hold true we are going to have to talk a few users on here off a ledge.
Seriously though even if they are not competing with Ti from the start AMD has to price around here considering the cost of making Vega (including R&D and legacy cost).
If that hold true we are going to have to talk a few users on here off a ledge.
Seriously though even if they are not competing with Ti from the start AMD has to price around here considering the cost of making Vega (including R&D and legacy cost).
Eastcoasthandle
Senior Member
Posts: 2543
Joined: 2006-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 2543
Joined: 2006-05-22
#5456223 Posted on: 07/27/2017 06:08 PM
Historically, AMD has never targeted nv pricing unless it was competitive to nv offerings. Also, they've been known to sandbag. If this holds out to be true and it's determined that it's competitive to a ti then some (new) feature(s) have been disabled. And won't be enabled until either the review drivers are released or a driver sometime after review drivers.
Right now, 17.7.2 (newly release driver for AMD) is the 1st driver that doesn't work properly with AB and GPUz. So it stands to reason this is some sort of new branch driver.
We will see
Historically, AMD has never targeted nv pricing unless it was competitive to nv offerings. Also, they've been known to sandbag. If this holds out to be true and it's determined that it's competitive to a ti then some (new) feature(s) have been disabled. And won't be enabled until either the review drivers are released or a driver sometime after review drivers.
Right now, 17.7.2 (newly release driver for AMD) is the 1st driver that doesn't work properly with AB and GPUz. So it stands to reason this is some sort of new branch driver.
We will see
Srsbsns
Senior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: 2015-01-28
Senior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: 2015-01-28
#5456226 Posted on: 07/27/2017 06:14 PM
I'm buying it anyway. The fine wine has treated me very well. Its been the opposite from the green team on my last two purchases. Not trying to be biased. Just my own anecdotal experiences but I feel like my Nvidia cards would be screaming one year but as soon as the new cards come out it can no longer handle new games. I know this is more of a conspiracy theory but i think there is some sort of planned obsolescence by nature in Nvidia's unified driver.
I'm buying it anyway. The fine wine has treated me very well. Its been the opposite from the green team on my last two purchases. Not trying to be biased. Just my own anecdotal experiences but I feel like my Nvidia cards would be screaming one year but as soon as the new cards come out it can no longer handle new games. I know this is more of a conspiracy theory but i think there is some sort of planned obsolescence by nature in Nvidia's unified driver.
Maddness
Senior Member
Posts: 1092
Joined: 2014-10-24
Senior Member
Posts: 1092
Joined: 2014-10-24
#5456293 Posted on: 07/27/2017 09:15 PM
Geez, they will rule a fair few people out. It would have to be faster or at the very least match the 1080Ti to justify that. Hopefully that pricing is wrong.
$815.07 u.s. Wow!
Geez, they will rule a fair few people out. It would have to be faster or at the very least match the 1080Ti to justify that. Hopefully that pricing is wrong.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 238
Joined: 2011-09-30
$815.07 U.S. Wow!