GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
How to: Firmware Update the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Photos and specs
On the mighty interwebs Sapphire once again leaked info and spec on the non X model of the R9 Fury, the heat-pipe based Radeon R9 Fury. The card has a big triple-slot Tri-X cooler based on what seem to be a AMD reference-design PCB.
The photos have specs-sheets with data similar to what was earlier suggested, 56 out of 64 compute units are enabled giving this product 3584 stream processors. The 4 GB 4096-bit HBM memory and its clocks are the same. The GPU core frequency is clocked a notch lower as well at 1000 MHz. (500 MHz memory). Sapphire will also sell a factory-overclocked card at 1040 MHz. The Radeon R9 Fury should launch mid-July (yes next week).
Sapphire Radeon 300 Series Lineup Leaks onto the WWW - 06/15/2015 07:29 AM
Yesterday the news reached our forums that Sapphire is listing the entire Radeon 300 Series on their website, and that includes the R9 390X, R9 390, R9 380, R7 370 and R7 360. And hey, there are ent...
Sapphire adds 8GB Tri-X model to R9 290X line - 01/22/2015 02:18 PM
The SAPPHIRE R9 290X 8GB Tri-X model combines the large 8GB frame buffer with the highly acclaimed SAPPHIRE exclusive Tri-X triple fan cooler, enhanced clocks and dual BIOS, making the large frame buf...
Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Lineup - 08/28/2014 07:28 AM
SAPPHIRE announced three new models in its successful R9 series of graphics cards based on the latest GCN (Graphics Core Next) architecture from AMD. The SAPPHIRE R9 285 Dual-X is a new model from SAP...
Sapphire releases Factory Overclocked 295x2 OC model - 04/24/2014 11:27 AM
Sapphire is about to release a Factory Overclocked R9-295x2 called the R9-295X2 OC. Now before you expect a massive tweak I'd say don't get excited just yet. The overclock is rather shameful and ve...
Sapphire Radeon R9 290 Vapor-X Launches - 04/04/2014 09:44 AM
Sapphire introduces the R9 290 Vapor-X which combines the company's exclusive Vapor-chamber technology with its highly acclaimed Tri-X triple fan cooler. The new Vapor-X models feature a number of ot...
Only Intruder
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 2007-01-16
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 2007-01-16
#5116844 Posted on: 07/07/2015 11:34 PM
Jesus that's massive!
Jesus that's massive!
If only that's what she said :'(
theoneofgod
Senior Member
Posts: 4095
Joined: 2014-01-17
Senior Member
Posts: 4095
Joined: 2014-01-17
#5116846 Posted on: 07/07/2015 11:36 PM
Bit of a heatsink overlap here
Good job it has a backplate or it would look like a banana in no time.
Positive thing here is the Fury isn't locked to reference!
Bit of a heatsink overlap here
Good job it has a backplate or it would look like a banana in no time.
Positive thing here is the Fury isn't locked to reference!
Enticles
Senior Member
Posts: 235
Joined: 2012-06-28
Senior Member
Posts: 235
Joined: 2012-06-28
#5116863 Posted on: 07/07/2015 11:45 PM
i am very curious to see how the aircooled temps compare to the AIO temps.
i am very curious to see how the aircooled temps compare to the AIO temps.
Only Intruder
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 2007-01-16
Senior Member
Posts: 1183
Joined: 2007-01-16
#5116889 Posted on: 07/08/2015 12:10 AM
I would have thought that looking at Tonga, where Sapphire have an ITX version of the card, that we would have seen comparable size cooling solution or even to that of the regular 285/380, I hope this is just the top end cooling solution card that sapphire offer and there there will be a more manageable sized card for the respective price point of the Fury.
This card is what'll get lots of sales imo, but if this is what the typical fansink design will have to be, not many people will like the card (thinking of heat dumped inside a system for example, will require good ventilated chassis).
There is the nano too though, I wonder where that card will sit in the tiers, will it be 380, 390x, nano, fury, fury x? Or will it be 380, nano etc?
I would have thought that looking at Tonga, where Sapphire have an ITX version of the card, that we would have seen comparable size cooling solution or even to that of the regular 285/380, I hope this is just the top end cooling solution card that sapphire offer and there there will be a more manageable sized card for the respective price point of the Fury.
This card is what'll get lots of sales imo, but if this is what the typical fansink design will have to be, not many people will like the card (thinking of heat dumped inside a system for example, will require good ventilated chassis).
There is the nano too though, I wonder where that card will sit in the tiers, will it be 380, 390x, nano, fury, fury x? Or will it be 380, nano etc?
theoneofgod
Senior Member
Posts: 4095
Joined: 2014-01-17
Senior Member
Posts: 4095
Joined: 2014-01-17
#5116910 Posted on: 07/08/2015 12:23 AM
I would have thought that looking at Tonga, where Sapphire have an ITX version of the card, that we would have seen comparable size cooling solution or even to that of the regular 285/380, I hope this is just the top end cooling solution card that sapphire offer and there there will be a more manageable sized card for the respective price point of the Fury.
This card is what'll get lots of sales imo, but if this is what the typical fansink design will have to be, not many people will like the card (thinking of heat dumped inside a system for example, will require good ventilated chassis).
There is the nano too though, I wonder where that card will sit in the tiers, will it be 380, 390x, nano, fury, fury x? Or will it be 380, nano etc?
It will be below the Fury or equal to it. Unless they further cut it down from the Fury.
I would have thought that looking at Tonga, where Sapphire have an ITX version of the card, that we would have seen comparable size cooling solution or even to that of the regular 285/380, I hope this is just the top end cooling solution card that sapphire offer and there there will be a more manageable sized card for the respective price point of the Fury.
This card is what'll get lots of sales imo, but if this is what the typical fansink design will have to be, not many people will like the card (thinking of heat dumped inside a system for example, will require good ventilated chassis).
There is the nano too though, I wonder where that card will sit in the tiers, will it be 380, 390x, nano, fury, fury x? Or will it be 380, nano etc?
It will be below the Fury or equal to it. Unless they further cut it down from the Fury.
TyrantofJustice
Senior Member
Posts: 5020
Joined: 2006-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 5020
Joined: 2006-05-18
#5116965 Posted on: 07/08/2015 02:41 AM
still no DVI ports ... damn
still no DVI ports ... damn
INSTG8R
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: 2005-03-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: 2005-03-18
#5117227 Posted on: 07/08/2015 01:13 PM
I like how everyone is thinking "it's so huge" when it's the same Tri-X cooler that is on the 290/390. Just the size of the PCB makes it seem like it's big.
I like how everyone is thinking "it's so huge" when it's the same Tri-X cooler that is on the 290/390. Just the size of the PCB makes it seem like it's big.
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14764
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14764
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5117267 Posted on: 07/08/2015 02:00 PM
Why is the cooler so big though?
Why is the cooler so big though?
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12505
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12505
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5117282 Posted on: 07/08/2015 02:13 PM
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
Why is the cooler so big though?
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 6784
Joined: 2006-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 6784
Joined: 2006-09-24
#5117300 Posted on: 07/08/2015 02:35 PM
I am just guessing they were too lazy to make a new one for the fury when they had working 3 fan coolers why not use the old ones But for sure it probably is 250w too.
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
I am just guessing they were too lazy to make a new one for the fury when they had working 3 fan coolers why not use the old ones
But for sure it probably is 250w too.
lshuman
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2013-06-01
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2013-06-01
#5118173 Posted on: 07/09/2015 02:17 AM
Color
What is up with this yellow color scheme of Sapphire? It's really turning me away from them. What ever happened to the all black or black blue scheme????
Color
What is up with this yellow color scheme of Sapphire? It's really turning me away from them. What ever happened to the all black or black blue scheme????
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9255
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9255
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5118316 Posted on: 07/09/2015 07:16 AM
I've never noticed the fins at the end of a heatsink like that really heating up even when a card is practically on fire. I would bet it would have near the same thermal results with a heatsink that matched the card length.
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
I've never noticed the fins at the end of a heatsink like that really heating up even when a card is practically on fire. I would bet it would have near the same thermal results with a heatsink that matched the card length.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Joined: 2007-04-12
On the mighty interwebs Sapphire once again leaked info and spec on the non X model of the R9 Fury, the heat-pipe based Radeon R9 Fury.Â*The card has a big triple-slot Tri-X cooler based on what seem ...
Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Photos and specs
HH u have it in house