Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis review
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
Samsung confirms 970 Evo Plus SSD hardware change, 980 Pro may be affected
Samsung silently updated the 970 Evo Plus SSD last month and changed components, a new controller, TLC NAND, and firmware. Some benchmarks indicated the impact of the change: the SSD performs better in some circumstances, but not so much in others. In other words, it became a completely different product under the same SKU name.
Samsung has issued a statement confirming the change of hardware and software:
“To ensure continued production of the popular Samsung 970 EVO Plus, Samsung has decided to upgrade the controller and NAND in the 970 EVO Plus and has updated the firmware to the new version "3B2QEXM7". The changes were dictated by global shortages affecting the production and availability of many components and devices.We believe that by increasing the intelligent TurboWrite buffer and optimizing software, our devices will even better meet the growing needs of consumers and improve the overall user experience.
With the release of the new version of the 970 EVO Plus drive, Samsung has posted an updated datasheet on its website. In the event of subsequent component updates, the company will keep the entire change history available on an ongoing basis to ensure transparent communication with customers.”
Because of the persistent shortages of components, Samsung would have chosen to employ alternative components. According to the corporation, with the advent of the revision came the publication of a new datasheet. Additionally, a full changelog will be made accessible in the future to assist in such situations. There is "clear communication with the customer" in this manner.
The manufacturer may be considering making similar changes to the 980 Pro. In addition, like with the 970 Evo Plus, a revised datasheet has been discovered, in which changes have been made: the new version refers to the new version as a Samsung in-house controller rather than a Samsung Elpis controller, and the description of TurboWrite technology has been updated.
A comparison of the old and new datasheets of the 970 Evo Plus and 980 Pro can be checked below.
Samsung announces mind boggling 200-megapixel image sensor ISOCELL HP1 - 09/06/2021 09:37 AM
Samsung has announced the release of the "ISOCELL HP1" image sensor, which will be used in mobile devices such as smartphones. It relates to the first 200 million pixels in the industry's...
Samsung Expands the Use of In-memory Processing Power - 08/25/2021 08:43 AM
Samsung's breakthroughs include the first successful integration of its PIM-enabled High Bandwidth Memory (HBM-PIM) into a commercially available accelerator system, as well as the expansion of PIM a...
Samsung S49A950UIU: 5K 120Hz USB-C dock and KVM monitor Dual QHD - 08/23/2021 09:14 AM
Samsung offers a range of ultra-wide 49-inch monitors with a resolution of 5,120 x 1,440 pixels in a 32: 9 aspect ratio, which the firm markets to gamers. The S49A950UIU however is billed as a busines...
Samsung leads the SSD market in Q2 2021. - 08/23/2021 09:02 AM
Solid state drive sales were nearly flat in Q2 2021. PC sales fell slightly sequentially in the first quarter, largely due to continued component shortages. In the second quarter, Samsung led the glob...
Samsung Develops 512 GB 7.2 Gbps DDR5 Memory Modules - 08/23/2021 08:37 AM
Samsung revealed their DDR5 memory standard development at this year's Hot Chips 33 conference. The corporation has made many advancements as the newer standard combines with new technologies to give...
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1859
Joined: 2012-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 1859
Joined: 2012-04-30
#5945698 Posted on: 09/11/2021 04:48 PM
Lots of folks dont seem to understand that it doesnt matter if "you" only change ONE thing,
changing/new packaging and manuals/upc/Qr codes, this isnt all free.
how many here would be fine, with all those changes (new rev/ new box etc) leading to even if its only a 5$ (retail) increase?
yeah, than we wont here the end of it that others are cheaper..
Lots of folks dont seem to understand that it doesnt matter if "you" only change ONE thing,
changing/new packaging and manuals/upc/Qr codes, this isnt all free.
how many here would be fine, with all those changes (new rev/ new box etc) leading to even if its only a 5$ (retail) increase?
yeah, than we wont here the end of it that others are cheaper..
umeng2002
Senior Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: 2006-09-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: 2006-09-02
#5945765 Posted on: 09/12/2021 12:09 AM
Ford: “We replaced the V8 in the truck you ordered and paid for with a V6 due to an engine shortage. Sorry, no refunds”
Keep it classy, tech companies.
Ford: “We replaced the V8 in the truck you ordered and paid for with a V6 due to an engine shortage. Sorry, no refunds”
Keep it classy, tech companies.
destruya
Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 2013-11-06
Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 2013-11-06
#5945791 Posted on: 09/12/2021 04:53 AM
If they change the hardware, it's no longer a 970 Evo Plus. Call it the 970A Evo Plus.
If they change the hardware, it's no longer a 970 Evo Plus. Call it the 970A Evo Plus.
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1859
Joined: 2012-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 1859
Joined: 2012-04-30
#5945792 Posted on: 09/12/2021 05:02 AM
@umeng2002/destruya
show me a ssd/nvme retail packaging/website etc, from samsung (used to advertise anywhere on this planet), where the controller is listed.
right.
like almost everything else, +80% on this planet will buy the performance (level), not a certain chip,
the ones that do, know about it.
(so funny how some are stuck on size/cylinder count, which has no no direct relation to its performance.
most hyper cars can now do about 800-1000/1500 HP out of a V6 hybrid setup.
part of the reason why brands start switching to use numbers to show perf/power, rather than displacement)
@umeng2002/destruya
show me a ssd/nvme retail packaging/website etc, from samsung (used to advertise anywhere on this planet), where the controller is listed.
right.
like almost everything else, +80% on this planet will buy the performance (level), not a certain chip,
the ones that do, know about it.
(so funny how some are stuck on size/cylinder count, which has no no direct relation to its performance.
most hyper cars can now do about 800-1000/1500 HP out of a V6 hybrid setup.
part of the reason why brands start switching to use numbers to show perf/power, rather than displacement)
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2543
Joined: 2017-08-18
It was not: coca almond is not cocaine (a bit like cannabis sativa is not cannabis to smoke)
Original recipe: coca almond + cola almond + caramel (to taste sweet and not bitter) + soda water...
neither coca or cola are in the actual one (so why is it still called Coca-Cola?) and principal ingredient is lemon and citric acid...
umm cannabis sativa is cannabis to smoke as is cannabis indica.
but you meant hemp, which is a sub-species.
the real heavy duty drug soda was "Dr. Pepper", which contained over 50mg of cocaine per bottle and had the dosage times as part of the branding - 10/12/4