Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Ryzen 7000X3D with 100 MB of cache already planned for this year
AMD aspires to be the leader in gaming performance. This CPU would be released shortly after the Ryzen 5 7600X, Ryzen 7 7800X, Ryzen 9 7900X, and 7950X.
AMD's Ryzen 7000 processor with 3D V-Cache technology is rumored to become available around the end of 2022. This year, a few months after the main range of Ryzen 7000 processors with Zen 4 was released. According to Greymon55, one of The Red Team's facilities has already begun mass production of the Ryzen 7000X3D, codenamed Raphael-X. AMD tested the power of 3D V-Cache technology with Zen 3, thus Raphael-X will almost definitely include many models, including the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
A 6-core Ryzen 5 7600X3D with a lower cache, most likely around 64MB, could also be in the works. AMD appears to have a wide range of processors planned for the coming years alright. Due to efficiency (5nm + architectural optimizations), gaming performance (10% IPC, faster clocks, V-Cache), and content production performance, AMD may be able to reclaim market dominance.
Rumor: Launch Date and Product Lineup for AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 Processors - 06/20/2022 08:45 AM
AMD's Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 lineup could include a Ryzen 9 7950X Flagship. AMD's next-generation CPUs will use the Zen 4 CPU. A leaked photograph from AMD China's "dealer promotion meeting" ...
Rumor: AMD Ryzen 7000 CPUs would see maximum boost frequency of 5.85 GHz. - 06/01/2022 09:35 AM
AMD Ryzen 7000 processors have been tested at high boost speeds, up to 5.5 GHz. However, it appears that they can go faster, rated with a maximum frequency of 5.85 GHz....
Raphael GPU on AMD Ryzen 7000 would get 128 RDNA2 shader cores - 06/01/2022 09:30 AM
If the chatter is real, the GPU of the new Ryzen 7000 processors will get 128 shaders cores and is codenamed "Coral Bandfish." If so, Raphael CPUs are only fitting for uncomplicated graphi...
AMD changes its statements, Ryzen 7000 will consume up to 230W - 05/27/2022 09:07 AM
After constantly assuring the press and fans that the 170W exhibited at Computex 2022 was the maximum power of the socket, the company has officially verified that the amount is, in fact, the maximum ...
AMD reaffirms that the 5.5+ GHz of the Ryzen 7000 in demo was achieved without overclocking - 05/26/2022 09:43 AM
During its presentation at Computex 2022, AMD announced (not released) its new line of Zen 4-based Ryzen 7000 processors. A demo based on a 16-core CPU running Ghostwire: Tokyo was demonstrated at spe...
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1858
Joined: 2012-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 1858
Joined: 2012-04-30
#6027768 Posted on: 06/23/2022 05:11 PM
@Agonist
you will have 10 times higher (neg) impact on latencies from internet/server than anything.
newer tech doesn't really need high fps anymore, if gpu capabilities are properly implemented .
e.g. i can reach below 7ms/3ms rendering latency in Siege, all on 60hz, while my friends 144hz doesn't do anything better regarding lag.
@schmidtbag
nope .
as amd stated, its for gaming "only", and 8 cores and up are usually what content ppl buy, so i don't see it making any sense for them to implement fps gaining stuff on (not commonly used) non gaming cpus like 7900 and 7950.
if they wanted that, there would be 5900/5950 with V cache
@Agonist
you will have 10 times higher (neg) impact on latencies from internet/server than anything.
newer tech doesn't really need high fps anymore, if gpu capabilities are properly implemented .
e.g. i can reach below 7ms/3ms rendering latency in Siege, all on 60hz, while my friends 144hz doesn't do anything better regarding lag.
@schmidtbag
nope .
as amd stated, its for gaming "only", and 8 cores and up are usually what content ppl buy, so i don't see it making any sense for them to implement fps gaining stuff on (not commonly used) non gaming cpus like 7900 and 7950.
if they wanted that, there would be 5900/5950 with V cache
chispy
Senior Member
Posts: 9295
Joined: 2006-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 9295
Joined: 2006-10-29
#6027771 Posted on: 06/23/2022 05:32 PM
I'm really looking forward to this new amd 7xxx cpus with 3D cache , they will be fast , very fast for gaming
I'm really looking forward to this new amd 7xxx cpus with 3D cache , they will be fast , very fast for gaming
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1628
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1628
Joined: 2012-10-07
#6027784 Posted on: 06/23/2022 05:57 PM
Nice, I'm needing a new platform (to replace 6700K), and I really like the approach of the 3D V-Cache - not too much power used but best or near best gaming performance. I strongly see myself going with the 7800X3D after being with Intel since forever!
Nice, I'm needing a new platform (to replace 6700K), and I really like the approach of the 3D V-Cache - not too much power used but best or near best gaming performance. I strongly see myself going with the 7800X3D after being with Intel since forever!
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1628
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1628
Joined: 2012-10-07
#6027792 Posted on: 06/23/2022 06:06 PM
@TheDeeGee
while above 60hz it gets smoother, most buy it to reduce input lag.
usually around 15-30ms i common, but using Nv reflex/gpu scheduling in 10, and using input lag reduction, you can get it doen to 8ms and less (depends if its cpu or gpu).
biggest gain would be a screen using some sort of sync, possibly reducing it further, but definitely helps with fps drop/stutter, and makes for smoother play.
Most people buy high Hz monitors for reduced motion blur and increased gaming awareness, not really the reduced input lag, as the difference between 240Hz and 500Hz is only worth a theoretical 2ms reduction in "human reaction time" (because 240Hz is a new frame every 4ms, and 500Hz is a new frame every 2ms)......even going from 144Hz to 240Hz you only gain 3ms.......and that is just immaterial & dwarfed when compared to human reaction speed which is somewhere between 150 - 250ms depending on individual. So high Hz screens are really instead about reduction of motion blur and increased information to the gamer (more "snapshots" in fast moving situations).
@TheDeeGee
while above 60hz it gets smoother, most buy it to reduce input lag.
usually around 15-30ms i common, but using Nv reflex/gpu scheduling in 10, and using input lag reduction, you can get it doen to 8ms and less (depends if its cpu or gpu).
biggest gain would be a screen using some sort of sync, possibly reducing it further, but definitely helps with fps drop/stutter, and makes for smoother play.
Most people buy high Hz monitors for reduced motion blur and increased gaming awareness, not really the reduced input lag, as the difference between 240Hz and 500Hz is only worth a theoretical 2ms reduction in "human reaction time" (because 240Hz is a new frame every 4ms, and 500Hz is a new frame every 2ms)......even going from 144Hz to 240Hz you only gain 3ms.......and that is just immaterial & dwarfed when compared to human reaction speed which is somewhere between 150 - 250ms depending on individual. So high Hz screens are really instead about reduction of motion blur and increased information to the gamer (more "snapshots" in fast moving situations).
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 810
Joined: 2015-05-19
It feels a bit weird to have a replacement CPU for Zen4 already a few months later. Does that mean gamers should just not buy the first wave of Zen4 at all, if the wait is only such a short time?
Also, what about a mix of gaming and productivity, eg. those of us that have a 5950, will we also get 3D Cache, or is the CPU too hot for that?