ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Cooler Master SK621 Compact keyboard review
AMD Athlon 220GE and 240GE review
Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 3200 MHz 2x8 GB review
Ryzen 7 2700X Proc Spotted - 300 MHz extra on Clocks Frequencies
Youtube User Tum Apisak has been responsible for a number of leaks and spots, often he was spot on. That said, he posted a screenshot of what seems to be a Ryzen 7 2700X processor in the 3DMark database. If this is a true valid screenshot when compared towards the Ryzen 7 1700X, the base clock is 300 MHz higher and the Turbo reached 4100 MHz.
The screenshot reveals pretty much all we need to know and expect about the 12nm Zen+ update and leaves little else to say. So let's keep things simple and understandable and compare the 2700X towards the 1700X.
|
|
||||||
|
Processor model |
Cores/Threads |
L3 Cache |
TDP |
Base |
Turbo |
Unlocked |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
8/16 |
16 MB |
95 W |
3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz |
Yes |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
8/16 |
16 MB |
95 W |
3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz |
Yes |
|
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
8/16 |
16 MB |
65 W |
3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
Yes |
With the base clock raised you should see some better single core performance, and combined with a Turbo to 4100 MHz, things would look pretty good. I can only assume that XFR remains active as well, which could boost another 100 MHz also. Tum Apisak did not share a link, he never does.
Ryzen 2000 are 12nm Zen+ optimized Ryzen processors, the 'refresh' SKUs so to say. 12nm Zen+ processors will work with your X370 chipset based motherboard, however, AMD will launch the new X470 chipset alongside the new Zen+ processors. The new chipset should offer small improvements and use less power. Details in specs are not yet known though.
Guru3D 2017 December 11 contest - Win An AMD Ryzen 7 1800X worth €499,- - 12/11/2017 10:38 AM
Heck yeah! It is that time of the year again. In December each workday we will give away a nice prize. That means up-to December 31st you will have a chance of winning something. This round you can wi...
Guide: AMD Ryzen 7 AGESA 1006 performance and DDR4 memory check June 2017 - 06/29/2017 11:59 AM
We'll have a look at the current state of Ryzen. Over the past two months a number of things have changed. AMD issued firmware updates to increase memory compatibility mostly. We'll check that out. ...
Review: Ryzen 7 1700 processor - 03/14/2017 09:39 AM
It is time to peek at the most affordable Ryzen 7 series eight-core processor, the AMD Ryzen 1700. This puppy costs you only 329 USD and it will tweak 'n clock towards 4 GHz just as well. With proper...
AMD Ryzen 7 have a Temperature 20 Degree C Reporting Offset - 03/14/2017 08:57 AM
Alright, in the same blog post as mentioned in the previous item AMD also talks about a Temperature Reporting Offset. This one was new to us, but basically what they claim is the following. To keep a...
Ryzen 7 1800X Overclocked to 5.8GHz Breaks Cinebench R15 World Record at 5.36GHz - 03/06/2017 10:22 AM
During the Ryzen technology event, overclockers broke two frequency world records with the flagship Ryzen 7 1800X. I was actually there at that precise moment they reached the tweak....
AlmondMan
Senior Member
Posts: 437
Joined: 2007-09-03
Senior Member
Posts: 437
Joined: 2007-09-03
#5524704 Posted on: 03/02/2018 02:14 PM
That's looking great if true.
Will certainly be looking out for a 2600... that'll be sweet value.
That's looking great if true.
Will certainly be looking out for a 2600... that'll be sweet value.
buhehe
Senior Member
Posts: 157
Joined: 2016-07-25
Senior Member
Posts: 157
Joined: 2016-07-25
#5524712 Posted on: 03/02/2018 02:42 PM
yea, that +5/10% performance will make it a "beast". Right.
Ill be upgrading my 1700X to this one or the new 2800X i realy need a bit more core speed , iam currently running my cpu @ 3975mhz if these manage to get all cores at 4400 it will truly be a beast for gaming and probably on par with the 8700k for gaming .
yea, that +5/10% performance will make it a "beast". Right.
sarsar
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2011-07-01
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2011-07-01
#5524721 Posted on: 03/02/2018 02:51 PM
You speak as a intel fanboy, only they are expecting 5-10% improvements every 6-8 months with a new socket/chipset/motherboard!
That 4.1 Ghz it's at least 15-20 % improvement over the 1000 series.
You speak as a intel fanboy, only they are expecting 5-10% improvements every 6-8 months with a new socket/chipset/motherboard!
That 4.1 Ghz it's at least 15-20 % improvement over the 1000 series.
yea, that +5/10% performance will make it a "beast". Right.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12052
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12052
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5524724 Posted on: 03/02/2018 02:56 PM
Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.
Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 807
Joined: 2014-11-19
Senior Member
Posts: 807
Joined: 2014-11-19
#5524727 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:03 PM
Zen+ is more of a fine tuning for Zen2 I think. I will be interested most in seeing the efficiency numbers compared to Zen. I will be waiting for Zen 2 regardless, if not Zen3. I am pretty happy right now.
Zen+ is more of a fine tuning for Zen2 I think. I will be interested most in seeing the efficiency numbers compared to Zen. I will be waiting for Zen 2 regardless, if not Zen3. I am pretty happy right now.
AsiJu
Senior Member
Posts: 5572
Joined: 2010-10-16
Senior Member
Posts: 5572
Joined: 2010-10-16
#5524730 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:07 PM
Looks good! The previous leak (forgot about which processor / from where) also hinted at some IPC improvement even if you factor out clockspeed.
Combined looks solid. Maybe not warranting an immediate upgrade if you already have 1000 series CPU but promising nonetheless.
Though I might get one anyway, just to:
- support AMD / Ryzen in general
- support a company that retains CPU socket / chipset compatibility over generations
- support a company that uses reasonable pricing
EDIT:
- support a company that uses soldered heatspreaders in entire product lineup (Ryzen, Epyc, Threadripper)
Looks good! The previous leak (forgot about which processor / from where) also hinted at some IPC improvement even if you factor out clockspeed.
Combined looks solid. Maybe not warranting an immediate upgrade if you already have 1000 series CPU but promising nonetheless.
Though I might get one anyway, just to:
- support AMD / Ryzen in general
- support a company that retains CPU socket / chipset compatibility over generations
- support a company that uses reasonable pricing
EDIT:
- support a company that uses soldered heatspreaders in entire product lineup (Ryzen, Epyc, Threadripper)
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 834
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 834
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5524731 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:08 PM
I said it would be 400mhz increase max, I wasn't far.
As for performance, the IPC improved slightly and the clocks too, so we should see the expected improvement from a refinement.
Hopefully this time AMD can manage a launch without memory issues.
I said it would be 400mhz increase max, I wasn't far.
As for performance, the IPC improved slightly and the clocks too, so we should see the expected improvement from a refinement.
Hopefully this time AMD can manage a launch without memory issues.
AsiJu
Senior Member
Posts: 5572
Joined: 2010-10-16
Senior Member
Posts: 5572
Joined: 2010-10-16
#5524733 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:10 PM
Oh yeah that's a good question. Especially as faster supported memory could push the performance a notch further still.
Though given Ryzen is pretty stable with memory support up to 3466 speed atm, I don't see why this would become an issue.
Oh yeah that's a good question. Especially as faster supported memory could push the performance a notch further still.
Though given Ryzen is pretty stable with memory support up to 3466 speed atm, I don't see why this would become an issue.
Crow2000
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2018-03-02
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2018-03-02
#5524747 Posted on: 03/02/2018 03:44 PM
2700X @ 4.2Ghz (It's XFR or Turbo?)
2800X @ 4.3-4 ??
Looks great.
2700X @ 4.2Ghz (It's XFR or Turbo?)
2800X @ 4.3-4 ??
Looks great.
k3vst3r
Junior Member
Posts: 3349
Joined: 2009-01-03
Junior Member
Posts: 3349
Joined: 2009-01-03
#5524750 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:05 PM
Probably saving higher frequencies for 2800X.
Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.
Probably saving higher frequencies for 2800X.
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5524753 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:13 PM
Can't wait for those 8 cores @ 4300 or more !
(Wanted Threadripper but I feel like I won't be able to use it properly... so scaling down)
My current Intel cpu (Broadwell-E 6800K) is only stable at 4.1 without going overboard with voltage and heat, and even so it was somewhat disappointing (not much better than the Ivy Bridge before it).
Perhaps 2018 is the real year of the upgrade !
Can't wait for those 8 cores @ 4300 or more !
(Wanted Threadripper but I feel like I won't be able to use it properly... so scaling down)
My current Intel cpu (Broadwell-E 6800K) is only stable at 4.1 without going overboard with voltage and heat, and even so it was somewhat disappointing (not much better than the Ivy Bridge before it).
Perhaps 2018 is the real year of the upgrade !
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7212
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7212
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5524759 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:22 PM
If it were the 2800x, i'd agree with your statement (specifically about doubting the increase in headroom of OCing), but since it's the 2700x, i'm not sure how your statement makes sense.
If the "increase" is the same across the bored, then boost will be somewhere around 4.4-4.5Ghz on the 2800x (depending on the max boost here if its talking about XFR or not)
And if it's the same increase across the board, that'd mean the 2800x would be:
2800x 8c16t 3.9Ghz/4.4-4.5Ghz Boost
And it wouldn't surprise me if they simple decided to go with 4Ghz as the base.
If the OC headroom becomes 4.4-4.6Ghz as the "easy" mark vs the 4.1Ghz that it is currently, that's a 7-12% increase in OC capability, and from such minor changes from Zen to Zen+, since this isn't Zen2, i'm not sure what (if these numbers are true) is disappointing. But ofcourse, again, if these numbers hold true.
Kind of underwhelming.. I was hoping for a 4.2/.3 boost and hopeful ability to take it .4/.5 clocking. I doubt the headroom for ocing will increase. Gonna wait for Zen 2 - unless of course this information is inaccurate.
If it were the 2800x, i'd agree with your statement (specifically about doubting the increase in headroom of OCing), but since it's the 2700x, i'm not sure how your statement makes sense.
If the "increase" is the same across the bored, then boost will be somewhere around 4.4-4.5Ghz on the 2800x (depending on the max boost here if its talking about XFR or not)
And if it's the same increase across the board, that'd mean the 2800x would be:
2800x 8c16t 3.9Ghz/4.4-4.5Ghz Boost
And it wouldn't surprise me if they simple decided to go with 4Ghz as the base.
If the OC headroom becomes 4.4-4.6Ghz as the "easy" mark vs the 4.1Ghz that it is currently, that's a 7-12% increase in OC capability, and from such minor changes from Zen to Zen+, since this isn't Zen2, i'm not sure what (if these numbers are true) is disappointing. But ofcourse, again, if these numbers hold true.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12052
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12052
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5524760 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:24 PM
I honestly completely forgot the 1800x exists.. I've recommend the 1700x so much. My bad.. lol
I honestly completely forgot the 1800x exists.. I've recommend the 1700x so much. My bad.. lol
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 869
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 869
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5524763 Posted on: 03/02/2018 04:34 PM
Oh yeah that's a good question. Especially as faster supported memory could push the performance a notch further still.
Though given Ryzen is pretty stable with memory support up to 3466 speed atm, I don't see why this would become an issue.
Memory support is hit or miss unless u buy specific kits that in my experience have a hefty premium over the others. Maybe this is just me but I had 3200mhz stable and after about a month of running computer became unstable for what seemed like no reason and I noticed it was doing the repetitive boots as if memory was unstable so now it only runs at 3066mhz.
Oh yeah that's a good question. Especially as faster supported memory could push the performance a notch further still.
Though given Ryzen is pretty stable with memory support up to 3466 speed atm, I don't see why this would become an issue.
Memory support is hit or miss unless u buy specific kits that in my experience have a hefty premium over the others. Maybe this is just me but I had 3200mhz stable and after about a month of running computer became unstable for what seemed like no reason and I noticed it was doing the repetitive boots as if memory was unstable so now it only runs at 3066mhz.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2011-03-20
Ill be upgrading my 1700X to this one or the new 2800X i realy need a bit more core speed , iam currently running my cpu @ 3975mhz if these manage to get all cores at 4400 it will truly be a beast for gaming and probably on par with the 8700k for gaming .