Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Rumor: GeForce RTX 3080 would have 4532 Cuda Cores and 10GB of Graphics Memory
With the recent set of photos leaked the rumor mill has shifted up a notch. New rumors now indicate that the possible specifications of the GeForce RTX 3080 would have 4532 Shader Cores and 10GB of Graphics Memory.
The new chatter (and a loose rumor at best) originates from Twitter user @ kopite7kimi, he however predicted several news about Ampere in the past in a correct fashion.
First off, 10GB of VRAM based on GDDR6 would indicate a 320-bit wide memory bus, which, possibly together with higher frequency GDDR6 memories, allows for increased bandwidth. Unfortunately, there is no information on their frequencies or GPUs or memories, or on the number of Tensor Cores or RT Cores at this time. The new RT Cores of these graphics cards are rumored to offer far more performance than those of Turing, and they will also have high-performance Tensor Cores, so we will undoubtedly see a strong advance in what Ray-Tracing is and technologies such as DLSS.
You will notice that the tweet holds more information regarding the lineup. Also, in other news word is that NVIDIA has launched an investigation on how the previously released photos have made their way online (Foxconn and BYD), as even most NVIDIa staff would not even have seen the new design.
Nvidia undoubtedly has an important announcement on the way, likely after the summer. At this time, this is a tweet, and it is just that at best. That's enough disclaimers ok?
Rumor: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Inbound - 08/29/2019 08:37 AM
If you look at the NVIDIA product stack there currently is space for two more products. In the enthusiast segment an RTX 2080 Ti SUPER, but in the lower end segment there would be space for a GeForce...
Rumor: GeForce GTX 1180 to launch July 30? - 06/05/2018 03:35 PM
It's a roller-coaster ride regarding the topic and the lack of precise information on it, a new report however now claims that the GeForce GTX 1180 will be launching July 30....
Rumor: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti to get locked 1607/1683 MHz base/boost clock - 10/13/2017 08:44 AM
So, there's a new rumor coming from your regular websites. NVIDIA is launching its new GTX 1070 Ti graphics card, the rumor now is that it cannot be overclocke and that all cards will get a 1607/16...
Rumor: GeForce GTX 1080 8GB gddr5x based on Pascal GPU in May - 03/11/2016 12:44 PM
Well, at least I have a nice juicy rumor just in time for the weekend. Asian based Benchlife claims that Nvidia will release a Pascal architecture based GeForce GTX 1080 with 8GB gddr5x in May. It wo...
Rumor: GeForce GTX Titan Black Edition and GTX 790 - 01/21/2014 12:18 PM
So we all know and understand that at one point Nvidia will release a Dual-GPU GeForce GTX 790 right ? Whenever that happens, I do not know for sure,. maybe March though. But likely that product will ...
kakiharaFRS
Senior Member
Posts: 952
Joined: 2015-11-21
Senior Member
Posts: 952
Joined: 2015-11-21
#5797999 Posted on: 06/10/2020 07:11 PM
that or modding/reshade/enb, ultra powerful monster PC hardware allow you to brute force your way to acceptable fps with unreaonable graphic quality
if the dual fan setup reduces that awful gpu backplate furnace this is very good news as this a major problem nowadays the no1 heat generator in a case, if you have borderlands 3 or another heavy game, let it run for 120min at max settings then try to touch the backplate you'll see...the gpu backplate is "baking" your components
4k gaming with max settings, no compromises.
that or modding/reshade/enb, ultra powerful monster PC hardware allow you to brute force your way to acceptable fps with unreaonable graphic quality
if the dual fan setup reduces that awful gpu backplate furnace this is very good news as this a major problem nowadays the no1 heat generator in a case, if you have borderlands 3 or another heavy game, let it run for 120min at max settings then try to touch the backplate you'll see...the gpu backplate is "baking" your components
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 14984
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 14984
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5798003 Posted on: 06/10/2020 07:20 PM
Its not universally hated, don't apply your own perspective on the subject.
Keep the cooler, to hell with the haters, if we left things up to morons who only care foe aesthetics pc's would all be hard locked to RGB rainbow pulse patterns.
3080 cooler is apparently universally hated in the leaks, due for a redesign...
Its not universally hated, don't apply your own perspective on the subject.
Keep the cooler, to hell with the haters, if we left things up to morons who only care foe aesthetics pc's would all be hard locked to RGB rainbow pulse patterns.
geogan
Senior Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2010-01-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2010-01-04
#5798007 Posted on: 06/10/2020 07:37 PM
High-end VR simulation is still where all hardware is STILL seriously lacking.
In some applications I can still only get less than 20FPS with my Oculus Rift at 1080×1200 resolution per eye - and that has the lowest resolution of all headsets right now, (that is with 1070/3900X combination.)
If I wanted to get something like the HP Reverb G2 with its 2,160 × 2,160 per-eye displays, there is no way even a 2080Ti could get anywhere near the proper 90FPS rates.
I mean it seems the industry can't even do one GPU per eye VR rendering yet FFS.
Well...this will decide if I stick with PC gaming or move over to console. I'm not paying more than $700 for a gpu and it needs to be faster than what I have. Having a 4k HDR TV has shown me some nice stuff. Such as FF7 remake on PS4 Pro, which is night and day with and without HDR. Doing searches, it seems the only real hdr monitors for PC are around $700. So that's $1400. Then I need to upgrade mobo/cpu.....or I could just buy a PS5/Xbox Series x and call it a day. Not sure right now. I hope AMD can be competitive and lower the prices. Nvidia's pricing is really pushing away the small high-end user base. It's not that I can't afford it. It's just pointless to buy it. I dont game enough on PC, there's not really AAA exclusives. It's just expensive to play a port with sharper textures. Especially with these new consoles getting Ray tracing.
High-end VR simulation is still where all hardware is STILL seriously lacking.
In some applications I can still only get less than 20FPS with my Oculus Rift at 1080×1200 resolution per eye - and that has the lowest resolution of all headsets right now, (that is with 1070/3900X combination.)
If I wanted to get something like the HP Reverb G2 with its 2,160 × 2,160 per-eye displays, there is no way even a 2080Ti could get anywhere near the proper 90FPS rates.
I mean it seems the industry can't even do one GPU per eye VR rendering yet FFS.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5798075 Posted on: 06/10/2020 10:20 PM
High-end VR simulation is still where all hardware is STILL seriously lacking.
In some applications I can still only get less than 20FPS with my Oculus Rift at 1080×1200 resolution per eye - and that has the lowest resolution of all headsets right now, (that is with 1070/3900X combination.)
If I wanted to get something like the HP Reverb G2 with its 2,160 × 2,160 per-eye displays, there is no way even a 2080Ti could get anywhere near the proper 90FPS rates.
I mean it seems the industry can't even do one GPU per eye VR rendering yet FFS.
2080Ti would have twice the performance at worst with your headset, more likely 3 times as many frames would get generated per second.
But VR issues usually come from poor coding and no optimizations.
That 2160x2160 resolution times 2 is just 26% more pixels than 4K. Considering IQ that VR uses, 2080Ti should cut though given content easily. But bad code is bad code.
High-end VR simulation is still where all hardware is STILL seriously lacking.
In some applications I can still only get less than 20FPS with my Oculus Rift at 1080×1200 resolution per eye - and that has the lowest resolution of all headsets right now, (that is with 1070/3900X combination.)
If I wanted to get something like the HP Reverb G2 with its 2,160 × 2,160 per-eye displays, there is no way even a 2080Ti could get anywhere near the proper 90FPS rates.
I mean it seems the industry can't even do one GPU per eye VR rendering yet FFS.
2080Ti would have twice the performance at worst with your headset, more likely 3 times as many frames would get generated per second.
But VR issues usually come from poor coding and no optimizations.
That 2160x2160 resolution times 2 is just 26% more pixels than 4K. Considering IQ that VR uses, 2080Ti should cut though given content easily. But bad code is bad code.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3275
Joined: 2006-04-25
3090Ti leaks:
Part PCB Chip Model Extension Memory Interface TBP Connectors:
SKU10 PG132 GA102 RTX 3090 (Ti/Super)* 24 GB GDDR6X (Double-Sided) 384-bt 350 W 3x DP, HDMI NVLink
SKU20 PG132 GA102 RTX 3080 (Ti/Super)* 11 GB GDDR6X* 352-bit* 320 W 3x DP, HDMI
SKU30 PG132 GA102 RTX 3080 none 10 GB GDDR6X 320-bit 320 W 3x DP, HDMI
3080 cooler is apparently universally hated in the leaks, due for a redesign...