ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
Rumor: AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 is scheduled to be introduced
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 is scheduled to be revealed shortly and is believed to have temporal upscaling and improved anti-aliasing.
The second iteration of AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (test) is expected to work on all graphics cards from all manufacturers and provide improved image quality. The developer of the capture and analysis software CapFrameX stated on Twitter was able to view "recordings" of FSR 2.0 and talks of an "amazing performance and image quality" that survives without the assistance of artificial intelligence.
FSR 2.0 to come/announced soon. Saw some footage today. Very impressive. ??
- Temporal upscaling + optimized AA
- Does not need AI
- Runs on GPUs from all vendors
- Impressive performance and image qualityAMD even claims that it can be better than native. ^^
#FSRGen2
AMD will offer a session titled "Next-Generation Image Upscaling for Games" as part of the Game Developer Conference 2022, which will take place March 21-25.
Rumor: AMD to launch the RX 6X50XT between June and July, and an RX 6500 in May - 02/03/2022 09:02 AM
Rumors concerning AMD's future plans continue to circulate, and Greymon55 specifically mentioned the new Radeon RX 6X50XT and a rumored RX 6500 (no XT) that would arrive a few weeks earlier....
Rumor: AMD Ryzen 6000 Rembrandt APUs Already In Mass Production - 09/07/2021 08:25 AM
AMD's packaging operations in China, according to leaked information from dataminer Greymon55, will have six new products ready to debut in the first half of 2022. The zen3+ architecture, which is an...
Rumor: AMD Radeon RX 6700 will arrive with 12GB of GDDR6 Graphics memory - 11/22/2020 11:13 AM
AMD just released its Radeon RX 6800 series graphics cards, but obviously, a Radeon RX 6700 is in the making as well. A rumor popped up on the web indicating that the Radeon RX 6700 will be based on ...
Rumor: AMD's Navi 21 GPU has 255 watts TGP and Boost up-to 2.4 GHz - 10/18/2020 03:35 PM
AMD will reveal its first RDNA 2 Radeon based products on October 28th. However new specs of the AMD Navi 21 XT “Big Navi” GPU for the Radeon RX 6900 XT graphics card have been reported by a credi...
Rumor: AMD Radeon Big Navi has 16GB VRAM (NAVI21), and 12GB for NAVI22 - 09/22/2020 06:01 PM
As we get closer to its announcements, AMD Big Navi is around the corner and they would like some momentum. More rumors are spreading the spiders' cyber web right now. AMD would be announcing two Big...
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2898
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2898
Joined: 2013-03-10
#6000717 Posted on: 03/14/2022 10:55 AM
I always find that "better than native" hilarious, but of course since what looks good is psychological, a matter of taste, it's not even automatically incorrect. Cameras (smartphone camera software) can have all kinds of filters to supposedly make an image better. Some simple things in Photoshop can potentially make images look better in human eyes. However, the fundamental problem is that game video is artificially created or reproduced (for example prerendered or recorded cutscene footage) in the first place. So, if a graphics card driver can make it look better, why didn't the game itself already make it look like that? And that's exactly where lies the problem in my opinion: If the driver makes the game look significantly/fundamentally different, is it not different from what the game studio intended? Of course a gamer's random screen might benefit from individual adjustment, which is not something game devs could easily handle, but automatic settings in a graphics card driver are no wiser, either.
I always find that "better than native" hilarious, but of course since what looks good is psychological, a matter of taste, it's not even automatically incorrect. Cameras (smartphone camera software) can have all kinds of filters to supposedly make an image better. Some simple things in Photoshop can potentially make images look better in human eyes. However, the fundamental problem is that game video is artificially created or reproduced (for example prerendered or recorded cutscene footage) in the first place. So, if a graphics card driver can make it look better, why didn't the game itself already make it look like that? And that's exactly where lies the problem in my opinion: If the driver makes the game look significantly/fundamentally different, is it not different from what the game studio intended? Of course a gamer's random screen might benefit from individual adjustment, which is not something game devs could easily handle, but automatic settings in a graphics card driver are no wiser, either.
Digilator
Senior Member
Posts: 536
Joined: 2019-05-29
Senior Member
Posts: 536
Joined: 2019-05-29
#6000733 Posted on: 03/14/2022 11:59 AM
Seems you are missing the point.
I always find that "better than native" hilarious, but of course since what looks good is psychological, a matter of taste, it's not even automatically incorrect. Cameras (smartphone camera software) can have all kinds of filters to supposedly make an image better. Some simple things in Photoshop can potentially make images look better in human eyes. However, the fundamental problem is that game video is artificially created or reproduced (for example prerendered or recorded cutscene footage) in the first place. So, if a graphics card driver can make it look better, why didn't the game itself already make it look like that? And that's exactly where lies the problem in my opinion: If the driver makes the game look significantly/fundamentally different, is it not different from what the game studio intended? Of course a gamer's random screen might benefit from individual adjustment, which is not something game devs could easily handle, but automatic settings in a graphics card driver are no wiser, either.
Seems you are missing the point.
Weekend
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2015-07-16
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2015-07-16
#6000734 Posted on: 03/14/2022 12:00 PM
yeah like mgs v on pc. the ultra DOF setting (I think it was in post processing setting?) was not the one Kojima intended for the game and ruined most of the cinematic shots. you had to put it on high and everything else on ultra. at that time nvidia advertised it as the better option but srsly it was not.
yeah like mgs v on pc. the ultra DOF setting (I think it was in post processing setting?) was not the one Kojima intended for the game and ruined most of the cinematic shots. you had to put it on high and everything else on ultra. at that time nvidia advertised it as the better option but srsly it was not.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2898
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2898
Joined: 2013-03-10
#6000736 Posted on: 03/14/2022 12:06 PM
That it's just advertisement speech? Perhaps. Maybe it's because I'm from a culture where ads have traditionally been fact-based, instead of being based on outrageous claims and superlatives.
Seems you are missing the point.
That it's just advertisement speech? Perhaps. Maybe it's because I'm from a culture where ads have traditionally been fact-based, instead of being based on outrageous claims and superlatives.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 2007-08-16
I hope upscaling becomes part of DirectX/Vulkan standard, so that it's up to the GPU how it handles it. That would be win-win scenario for consumers.