Reviews: GeForce RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti Founder Edition

#5586372 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:02 PM

---

it's live fellas !

#5586374 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:04 PM

---

Thanks for the review. Lol performance is even more disapointing than expected. Again glad i cancelled my preorder.

#5586378 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:08 PM

---

Not first but who cares. *Grab coffee*

Here we gooooo !

Posted a link on reddit r/PCGaming

#5586382 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:16 PM

---

#5586383 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:16 PM

---

what?

#5586384 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:17 PM

---

Where's the guy saying that 2070 is faster than a 1080 ti ?

#5586385 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:19 PM

---

They could had named them 1090 and 1090ti considering the price range and performance.

Sure its an upgrade but at the high cost of €.

If atleast they released a card at the same price range of an old gen card (1080ti?) that performed better than that... fine. But this feels like an expansion of the current gen under different arch and the usual Nvidia gimmicks

#5586388 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:20 PM

---

In non of the games tested was the 2080 ti anywhere near 50% faster than the 1080 ti, as nvidia had otherwise claimed. It is roughly 35% faster, just as in the leaked benchmarks.

Going from the previous gen x80 ti to the new gen x80 ti, it's the smallest performance increase in recent gens. Only the upgrade from 480 to 580 was smaller.

#5586390 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:23 PM

---

The real question is why to buy!?

.............PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER FOR : RAY TRACING...............o_O

#5586392 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:27 PM

---

This kind of performance was expected given the specs.

#5586393 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:27 PM

---

Considering the price of the 2080 and most probably bad Ray Tracing performance compared to 2080ti... I cannot imagine who would be buying it instead of 1080ti or as an upgrade. Although the 2080ti performance is very impressive, the price tag is just insane at the moment.

#5586394 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:28 PM

---

Somethings odd with a few of these benches. I perform on average 10+ fps higher than what showing in these charts with my 1080ti with a old 5820k. The witcher 3 bench is spot on for what i do, with a average of 108 fps 1440p ultra for me, but ones like wolf 2 which I do around 144 1440p and far cry 5 I do an average of 110 instead of the 101 it shows, something seems iffy. What clocks were the 2080ti running at during these benches, and what was the 1080ti running at core clock wise?

#5586399 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:31 PM

---

2080Ti is a must for 4K users and maybe UW 1440p but not for the rest of the crowd.


There's nothing wrong here. HH is using FE cards that are clocked lower than 3rd party cards so your Zotac probably has a +150MHz lead over an FE card which does a lot to the FPS.

#5586401 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:37 PM

---

1) We use reference cards
2) you use a different PC
3) scenes differ and vary in FPS

You cannot literally say hey Guru3D is seeing 90 FPS, but I get 100 FPS. We test (as much as we can) in the more stringent on the GPU areas. But the test results are always an indication of performance (hopefully as close to your as possible), however since we always test in the exact same scenes, that is the basis of comparison and our reference point.

#5586404 Posted on: 09/19/2018 02:40 PM

---

Think HH is right about his cards sound levels being off. Checked out some other reviews and for idle and gaming sounds are "pretty damn quiet".