Cooler Master MasterBox NR600 review
MSI to unveil 10th Anniversary RTX 2080 Ti Lightning Edition
Ballistix Elite 3600 MHz 16GB Dual Channel DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Review: XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 8G
We review the Fatboy from XFX, the Radeon RX 590 is in the house and what will it be? What GPU will sit underneath that hood, Polaris? Of course, it is, but let's talk about that in greater detail in this review.
Read the full review right here.
Review: PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 590 8G - 11/15/2018 04:00 PM
It is November 15, 2018 and AMD today launched a new Polaris refresh GPU. Baked on 12nm the Radeon RX 590 has been born. In our review we'll peek at the PowerColor Radeon RX 590 Red Devil edition. It...
Review: ASUS ROG GeForce RTX 2070 STRIX - 11/14/2018 10:30 AM
We reviewed the value proposition GeForce RTX 2070 from ASUS already, but now it's time to step it up a notch with the better developed Republic Of Gamers STRIX model. Read the full review here.
Review: Corsair K70 RGB MK.2 Low Profile Rapidfire - 11/12/2018 06:49 PM
We review a new revision Corsair RGB MK.2 series keyboard, and it adds something that I have been yearning for a long time with a low profile design. As such we review the Corsair K70 RGB MK.2 Low Pr...
Review: Battlefield V: PC graphics performance benchmarks analysis - 11/09/2018 04:37 PM
It is time to review the graphics performance of what probably is the biggest selling AAA status PC game title of 2018, yes Battlefield V has unlocked for premier users, and we'll start investigating...
Review: Apacer Panther Rage DDR4 RGB (2x8 GB) 3200 MHz DDR4 - 11/08/2018 12:48 PM
Today we are reviewing Apacer Panther Rage DDR4 RGB memory. This is a successor to the Panther Rage Illumination and the Panther Rage. The first thing that you’ll notice is the claw-shaped d...
gydj
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 2015-01-13
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 2015-01-13
#5608018 Posted on: 11/16/2018 06:22 PM
Why such a misandric name?
Why such a misandric name?
Arbie
Senior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: 2008-07-04
Senior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: 2008-07-04
#5608045 Posted on: 11/16/2018 07:27 PM
@HH: You repeated this sentence from the PowerColor 590 review:
@HH: You repeated this sentence from the PowerColor 590 review:
The cooler being wrongly configured might draw 10 watts alone though.
That apparently doesn't apply to this XFX board.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35095
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35095
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5608071 Posted on: 11/16/2018 08:56 PM
That already was fixed, thank you.
That apparently doesn't apply to this XFX board.
That already was fixed, thank you.
user1
Senior Member
Posts: 1301
Joined: 2016-01-29
Senior Member
Posts: 1301
Joined: 2016-01-29
#5608079 Posted on: 11/16/2018 09:22 PM
I'm trying to figure out the purpose of this card...but I cannot.
Shouldn't AMD concentrate on releasing something which is actually good instead of these strange refresh thingys? This card is...nothing. Not good, not bad, not average. I'm sure it will be forgotten quite soon.
this is a gap filler product, it has been done in the past. the gtx 285 and hd 4890 come to mind.
its also cheap for amd to do relatively speaking, to get a edge over the 1060
I'm trying to figure out the purpose of this card...but I cannot.
Shouldn't AMD concentrate on releasing something which is actually good instead of these strange refresh thingys? This card is...nothing. Not good, not bad, not average. I'm sure it will be forgotten quite soon.
this is a gap filler product, it has been done in the past. the gtx 285 and hd 4890 come to mind.
its also cheap for amd to do relatively speaking, to get a edge over the 1060
Quicks
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2006-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2006-05-22
#5608096 Posted on: 11/16/2018 10:10 PM
Nvidia not supporting their older models anymore? 980TI was king of the hill what is happening here. This bring back thought that they are deliberately hindering the performance for older models?
Nvidia not supporting their older models anymore? 980TI was king of the hill what is happening here. This bring back thought that they are deliberately hindering the performance for older models?
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 6781
Joined: 2011-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 6781
Joined: 2011-07-20
#5608170 Posted on: 11/17/2018 02:54 AM
They should have made something like a rx560x to compete with 1050ti...now that would sell.
They should have made something like a rx560x to compete with 1050ti...now that would sell.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9259
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9259
Joined: 2003-05-24
#5608174 Posted on: 11/17/2018 03:27 AM
what are you talking about..
Nvidia not supporting their older models anymore? 980TI was king of the hill what is happening here. This bring back thought that they are deliberately hindering the performance for older models?
what are you talking about..
mikeysg
Senior Member
Posts: 2390
Joined: 2003-05-13
Senior Member
Posts: 2390
Joined: 2003-05-13
#5608178 Posted on: 11/17/2018 04:37 AM
Well, to me, the RX 590 seems to be a very good fit for 1080P gaming......beating the GTX1060 by a good margin in some games. I guess AMD wants to take the crown off the entry level 1080P title from the GTX 1060, and looking at the numbers, I believe they've achieved this.
Well, to me, the RX 590 seems to be a very good fit for 1080P gaming......beating the GTX1060 by a good margin in some games. I guess AMD wants to take the crown off the entry level 1080P title from the GTX 1060, and looking at the numbers, I believe they've achieved this.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5608223 Posted on: 11/17/2018 01:09 PM
Indeed. It have more vram and its faster than 1060 and i dont think gddr5x version would make any difference. If you cant afford it you can always turn back and get a 580, that is what AMD wants.
Well, to me, the RX 590 seems to be a very good fit for 1080P gaming......beating the GTX1060 by a good margin in some games. I guess AMD wants to take the crown off the entry level 1080P title from the GTX 1060, and looking at the numbers, I believe they've achieved this.
Indeed. It have more vram and its faster than 1060 and i dont think gddr5x version would make any difference. If you cant afford it you can always turn back and get a 580, that is what AMD wants.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1473
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1473
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5608230 Posted on: 11/17/2018 02:14 PM
These aren't entry level cards. They are mainstream.
Well, to me, the RX 590 seems to be a very good fit for 1080P gaming......beating the GTX1060 by a good margin in some games. I guess AMD wants to take the crown off the entry level 1080P title from the GTX 1060, and looking at the numbers, I believe they've achieved this.
These aren't entry level cards. They are mainstream.
mikeysg
Senior Member
Posts: 2390
Joined: 2003-05-13
Senior Member
Posts: 2390
Joined: 2003-05-13
#5608237 Posted on: 11/17/2018 03:03 PM
To me they are!:p
Yeah, I'd used the wrong nomenclature, 1080P is mainstream alright.
These aren't entry level cards. They are mainstream.
To me they are!:p
Yeah, I'd used the wrong nomenclature, 1080P is mainstream alright.
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5608261 Posted on: 11/17/2018 05:34 PM
this is a gap filler product, it has been done in the past. the gtx 285 and hd 4890 come to mind.
its also cheap for amd to do relatively speaking, to get a edge over the 1060
This is the first time a card has been refreshed twice though right? least with it kept at the top of the pile, think the 7970 was also refreshed but AMD did put cards above it. Sorry if im wrong going off the top of my head on this
But its an odd card to bring out personally, either its a gap filler... in which case why bring it out now and not a few months back... or AMD seriously has nothing in the GPU department right now. Which wouldn't be that shocking considering Nvidia prices and not a huge performance increase. Though as i mentioned in one of the other posts anyone who got a 290x/390x got an amazing deal, thoughs cards are still pretty darn powerful considering how old they both are now.
this is a gap filler product, it has been done in the past. the gtx 285 and hd 4890 come to mind.
its also cheap for amd to do relatively speaking, to get a edge over the 1060
This is the first time a card has been refreshed twice though right? least with it kept at the top of the pile, think the 7970 was also refreshed but AMD did put cards above it. Sorry if im wrong going off the top of my head on this
But its an odd card to bring out personally, either its a gap filler... in which case why bring it out now and not a few months back... or AMD seriously has nothing in the GPU department right now. Which wouldn't be that shocking considering Nvidia prices and not a huge performance increase. Though as i mentioned in one of the other posts anyone who got a 290x/390x got an amazing deal, thoughs cards are still pretty darn powerful considering how old they both are now.
Exodite
Senior Member
Posts: 1828
Joined: 2006-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 1828
Joined: 2006-09-28
#5608279 Posted on: 11/17/2018 07:27 PM
No, it's not really an uncommon practice.
The Nvidia G92 comes across as the most egregious offender that I recall offhand, being used in a huge number of products across multiple generations of cards, but the RX 590 really isn't a standout in general. In fact I'd argue that the RX 590 is even a fairly mild offender, as there's actually been some tweaks and a lithography change for the chip in its newest incarnation.
At the end of the day what matters it what we get for our money, and there the RX 590 is delivering sufficiently IMO. It's the most powerful GPU in its price range (Black Friday rebates excluded), has a compelling game bundle and isn't lacking features in a generational context. The only concern, again IMO, would be power usage as there are some midrange systems with cheap/bad and/or low-power PSUs that might have to double check whether or not they can run the card.
Both AMD and Nvidia are guilty of "rebranding" GPUs on multiple occasions, arguably Intel as well if you consider how little has changed architecturally since Sandy Bridge, but the only time it's really a concern is when the rebranded versions aren't supporting the feature sets their new name would imply.
This is the first time a card has been refreshed twice though right?
No, it's not really an uncommon practice.
The Nvidia G92 comes across as the most egregious offender that I recall offhand, being used in a huge number of products across multiple generations of cards, but the RX 590 really isn't a standout in general. In fact I'd argue that the RX 590 is even a fairly mild offender, as there's actually been some tweaks and a lithography change for the chip in its newest incarnation.
At the end of the day what matters it what we get for our money, and there the RX 590 is delivering sufficiently IMO. It's the most powerful GPU in its price range (Black Friday rebates excluded), has a compelling game bundle and isn't lacking features in a generational context. The only concern, again IMO, would be power usage as there are some midrange systems with cheap/bad and/or low-power PSUs that might have to double check whether or not they can run the card.
Both AMD and Nvidia are guilty of "rebranding" GPUs on multiple occasions, arguably Intel as well if you consider how little has changed architecturally since Sandy Bridge, but the only time it's really a concern is when the rebranded versions aren't supporting the feature sets their new name would imply.
Kaleid
Senior Member
Posts: 2301
Joined: 2004-02-02
Senior Member
Posts: 2301
Joined: 2004-02-02
#5608280 Posted on: 11/17/2018 07:31 PM
Power usage is through the roof, I'm still fine with rx480x @ 1440p.
Perhaps something better next year, we need new cores.
Power usage is through the roof, I'm still fine with rx480x @ 1440p.
Perhaps something better next year, we need new cores.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6448
Joined: 2009-11-13
I'm trying to figure out the purpose of this card...but I cannot.
Shouldn't AMD concentrate on releasing something which is actually good instead of these strange refresh thingys? This card is...nothing. Not good, not bad, not average. I'm sure it will be forgotten quite soon.