Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Corsair HS80 RGB Wireless Headset review
Intel Architecture day 2021: Alder Lake
Review: Team Group Cardea II NVMe 1 TB SSD
Team Group announced its T-FORCE CARDEA II NVMe SSD boasting features like PCIe Gen3 x4 high-speed interface and a cooling module with “patented gaming fin design”. We had the opportunity to test the 1TB model. The T-FORCE CARDEA II is an SSD with a storage capacity of 256GB / 512GB / 1TB.
Read the review here.
Review: ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX/TB3 (+ABB/ ABBA testing) - 10/04/2019 09:54 AM
ASRock is back with one of the hippest X570 motherboards I have seen to date, it is the ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX-TB3 and as you can guess from its name, this puppy offers an ITX form factor, you...
Review: Patriot P200 1TB SATA3 SSD - 10/03/2019 11:24 AM
Mid-July Patriot announced its P200 SATA SSD, intended as a storage solution with a really good price. We had the opportunity to test the 1TB model. This SATA SSD was built with Silicon Motion or Maxi...
Review: ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Taichi OC+ - 10/01/2019 10:15 AM
ASRock is going a bit more premium with their all-new Radeon RX 5700 XT Taichi, in specific we test the OC+ edition. It has the best clocks, new looks, and silent acoustic levels. Fabricated at a 7nm ...
Review: KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 Super EX Gamer Black - 09/27/2019 03:54 PM
We review the KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 Super EX Gamer Black, NVIDIA has launched graphics cards in their new Super series, as in super-charged. GeForce RTX 2070 Super, of course, is based on a Turing TU1...
Review: DeepCool Assassin III - The Noctua Assassin? - 09/27/2019 10:54 AM
We test and review the DeepCool Assassin III, a heat pipe cooler that is showing very impressive results in both cooling performance and low acoustics. DeepCool even asked us to specifically compare w...
toyo
Senior Member
Posts: 391
Joined: 2008-10-15
Senior Member
Posts: 391
Joined: 2008-10-15
#5718741 Posted on: 10/09/2019 10:29 PM
I was obviously comparing the 500GB models. The idea is that the at the same-ish size of 500-512GB, the endurance for this TLC drive is above the MLC 970 Pro drive, which does not make any sense whatsoever and seems very inflated.
If you want to compare the 1GB drives, it still shows the TLC Team Group drive well ahead, at 1,665 TBW, while the 970 Pro is at "just" 1200TBW.
Doesn't make any sense. It's somewhat worrying that SSD manufacturers would just randomly inflate their endurance numbers.
The 970 pro 1tb is a 5-Year Limited Warranty or 1,200 TBW Limited Warranty https://www.samsung.com/uk/memory-storage/970-pro-nvme-m2-ssd-/MZ-V7P1T0BW/
I was obviously comparing the 500GB models. The idea is that the at the same-ish size of 500-512GB, the endurance for this TLC drive is above the MLC 970 Pro drive, which does not make any sense whatsoever and seems very inflated.
If you want to compare the 1GB drives, it still shows the TLC Team Group drive well ahead, at 1,665 TBW, while the 970 Pro is at "just" 1200TBW.
Doesn't make any sense. It's somewhat worrying that SSD manufacturers would just randomly inflate their endurance numbers.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5719577 Posted on: 10/11/2019 07:00 PM
I was obviously comparing the 500GB models. The idea is that the at the same-ish size of 500-512GB, the endurance for this TLC drive is above the MLC 970 Pro drive, which does not make any sense whatsoever and seems very inflated.
If you want to compare the 1GB drives, it still shows the TLC Team Group drive well ahead, at 1,665 TBW, while the 970 Pro is at "just" 1200TBW.
Doesn't make any sense. It's somewhat worrying that SSD manufacturers would just randomly inflate their endurance numbers.
It's been like for all the Phison E12 drives I've seen. I think it's marketing more than an actual endurance number that reflects reality.....unless there's some kind of magic firmware that these E12 drives have that can somehow get around the inherent lower durability of TLC NAND. They're probably banking on the fact that almost no one will use their drives enough to wear them out...let's face it, most of us don't even use 2% of our SSD's life before we upgrade to a bigger or faster SSD....and for the very small minority of consumers that do push their SSD to the limit everyday, then I think these companies are feeling ok about sucking it up & giving them an RMA if it doesn't live up to their quoted endurance figures - that would probably be only one person in a few thousand (how many thousands I don't know!).
I was obviously comparing the 500GB models. The idea is that the at the same-ish size of 500-512GB, the endurance for this TLC drive is above the MLC 970 Pro drive, which does not make any sense whatsoever and seems very inflated.
If you want to compare the 1GB drives, it still shows the TLC Team Group drive well ahead, at 1,665 TBW, while the 970 Pro is at "just" 1200TBW.
Doesn't make any sense. It's somewhat worrying that SSD manufacturers would just randomly inflate their endurance numbers.
It's been like for all the Phison E12 drives I've seen. I think it's marketing more than an actual endurance number that reflects reality.....unless there's some kind of magic firmware that these E12 drives have that can somehow get around the inherent lower durability of TLC NAND. They're probably banking on the fact that almost no one will use their drives enough to wear them out...let's face it, most of us don't even use 2% of our SSD's life before we upgrade to a bigger or faster SSD....and for the very small minority of consumers that do push their SSD to the limit everyday, then I think these companies are feeling ok about sucking it up & giving them an RMA if it doesn't live up to their quoted endurance figures - that would probably be only one person in a few thousand (how many thousands I don't know!).
jura11
Senior Member
Posts: 2608
Joined: 2015-03-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2608
Joined: 2015-03-20
#5720461 Posted on: 10/14/2019 10:10 PM
How much cost Samsung 970 EVO or Pro, I can get Sabrent Rocket NVMe 1TB for £90-£100 and Samsung sadly cost in £170-£190 for EVO and for Pro that's different ballpark
I bought for friend Sabrent 512GB NVMe and temperatures are in 28°C idle and 48°C as max with cheap heatsink from Akasa
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
the 970 evo plus that I sadly don't have keeps ruling it seems crazy that absolutely nobody talks about it (I have a 970 pro 1Tb that said)
How much cost Samsung 970 EVO or Pro, I can get Sabrent Rocket NVMe 1TB for £90-£100 and Samsung sadly cost in £170-£190 for EVO and for Pro that's different ballpark
I bought for friend Sabrent 512GB NVMe and temperatures are in 28°C idle and 48°C as max with cheap heatsink from Akasa
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2807
Joined: 2008-02-25
The endurance seems a bit inflated for TLC NAND, especially coupled with the 3 years warranty? 800TBW for the the 500GB model? The 970 Evo Plus only offers 300TBW, and the MLC 970 Pro just 600TBW, I have no idea where T-FORCE is coming with these figures from.
I have a 500MB one, if you're curious about something specific just ask. It's nothing exceptional, just another NVMe SSD.
The 970 pro 1tb is a 5-Year Limited Warranty or 1,200 TBW Limited Warranty https://www.samsung.com/uk/memory-storage/970-pro-nvme-m2-ssd-/MZ-V7P1T0BW/