Resident Evil Village: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Enermax LIQMAX III aRGB 240mm review
PCIe Resizable BAR Performance AMD and NVIDIA benchmarks
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2021
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
Acer Predator Apollo and Predator Talos DRAM Review
ASUS TUF Z590-Plus WIFI review
ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D OC review
Enermax Aquafusion 360 review LCS
Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Review: Strange Brigade PC graphics card benchmark analysis
AMD has added a funny new game towards its software lineup, Strange Brigade is bundled with their selected cards. We wanted to fab a bit of a performance review as the game supports both Vulkan and DirectX 12 but also has a DirectX ASync Compute switch available. That all by itself is handy to check out the current state of Vulkan, and DirectX 12.
Read the performance review here.
Review: Guru3D Rig of the Month - August 2018 - 08/31/2018 09:11 AM
It's the last week of the month, and you know what that means. The August edition of the Guru3D Rig of the month 2018 comes from Belgium, meet Tony, who assembles trucks for a living - his rig lookin...
Review: Samsung X5 Portable SSD (Thunderbolt 3 NVMe) @ 2800 MB/s - 08/31/2018 08:22 AM
Have you ever seen a portable storage unit reach 2800 MB/sec? Well hey now, we review the Samsung X5 Portable SSD (1000GB). This, by far, is the fastest portable storage to date as it is NVMe and Thun...
Quick review: GeChic On-Lap 1102H Portable External Display - 08/30/2018 09:08 AM
So you're on vacation, have a small console but need a display? Or you're working overseas on your laptop but need that bit more screen space? Well, the GeChic On-Lap 1102H Portable External Display...
Review: Asustor AS4004T 10 Gigabit Consumer NAS - 08/28/2018 11:08 AM
Slowly but steadily Multi Gig Ethernet is arriving into the consumer domain. ASUSTOR has released a new NAS with 10 Gigabit Ethernet for the consumer market. Armed with a dual-core processor the AS400...
Review: Codemasters F1 2018 graphics card performance analysis - 08/26/2018 02:34 PM
Codemasters F1 2018 is once again a fun title serving a very specific audience bumped up a notch from the 2017 edition. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performan...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3370
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3370
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5580066 Posted on: 08/31/2018 03:54 PM
Great optimization there! How's the game btw?
Great optimization there! How's the game btw?
fatboyslimerr
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2015-04-14
Junior Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 2015-04-14
#5580069 Posted on: 08/31/2018 04:06 PM
Maybe it's just me but I thought DX12 and, to an extent, Vulcan were both able to leverage more cores and weren't just about those GHz. Less CPU overhead or at least more balanced CPU overhead or something like that.
It would be more interesting to see these APIs tested on say a 1060, 1080, 570 and Vega 64 with say an FX 8300, Ryzen 5 and something like i7 2600 vs your standard test bench.
Maybe it's just me but I thought DX12 and, to an extent, Vulcan were both able to leverage more cores and weren't just about those GHz. Less CPU overhead or at least more balanced CPU overhead or something like that.
It would be more interesting to see these APIs tested on say a 1060, 1080, 570 and Vega 64 with say an FX 8300, Ryzen 5 and something like i7 2600 vs your standard test bench.
Brisse
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-05-28
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-05-28
#5580077 Posted on: 08/31/2018 04:32 PM
IMO you are not praising Vulkan highly enough here. It is an open and portable standard, unlike d3d12 which is proprietary locked down crap. The fact that the developers implemented it alongside d3d12 and that it performs on par is awesome for those of us who doesn't use Windows. While this game has no Linux-port as far as I know, it would still run awesomely on Linux using compatibility layers like Proton or Wine. With Vulkan, it would have pretty much zero extra overhead since the graphics API doesn't have to be translated by the compatability layer. A shame it has Denuvo though, as it's rootkit-like functionallity often causes trouble for compatibility layers. Here's to hoping they remove that crap ASAP.
Doom 2016 is a great example of how awesome compatibility layers can be when using Vulkan:
IMO you are not praising Vulkan highly enough here. It is an open and portable standard, unlike d3d12 which is proprietary locked down crap. The fact that the developers implemented it alongside d3d12 and that it performs on par is awesome for those of us who doesn't use Windows. While this game has no Linux-port as far as I know, it would still run awesomely on Linux using compatibility layers like Proton or Wine. With Vulkan, it would have pretty much zero extra overhead since the graphics API doesn't have to be translated by the compatability layer. A shame it has Denuvo though, as it's rootkit-like functionallity often causes trouble for compatibility layers. Here's to hoping they remove that crap ASAP.
Doom 2016 is a great example of how awesome compatibility layers can be when using Vulkan:
Raider0001
Senior Member
Posts: 448
Joined: 2006-11-25
Senior Member
Posts: 448
Joined: 2006-11-25
#5580078 Posted on: 08/31/2018 04:37 PM
Maybe it's just me but I thought DX12 and, to an extent, Vulcan were both able to leverage more cores and weren't just about those GHz. Less CPU overhead or at least more balanced CPU overhead or something like that.
It would be more interesting to see these APIs tested on say a 1060, 1080, 570 and Vega 64 with say an FX 8300, Ryzen 5 and something like i7 2600 vs your standard test bench.
U do not really need CPU power for games, these are not that complicated tasks (like calculating proteins), U just need something to handle the graphic cards driver according to the performance it is capable of doing and then some for the AI and sound and engine
Maybe it's just me but I thought DX12 and, to an extent, Vulcan were both able to leverage more cores and weren't just about those GHz. Less CPU overhead or at least more balanced CPU overhead or something like that.
It would be more interesting to see these APIs tested on say a 1060, 1080, 570 and Vega 64 with say an FX 8300, Ryzen 5 and something like i7 2600 vs your standard test bench.
U do not really need CPU power for games, these are not that complicated tasks (like calculating proteins), U just need something to handle the graphic cards driver according to the performance it is capable of doing and then some for the AI and sound and engine
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3343
Joined: 2008-03-08
I have not heard of the game either,but it looks like something I would like to play.Thanks for the review.