ASUS STRIX B550-I Gaming review
Kioxia Exceria 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD review
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - June 2020
ASUS ROG Strix Z490-E Gaming review
MSI MEG Z490 Godlike review
TeamGroup Cardea Zero Z340 M.2 NVMe review
AMD Ryzen RAM scaling - performance effect in games
Elgato WAVE:3 review
Gigabyte B550i Aorus PRO AX review
Review: Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark analysis
We take a look at Red Dead Redemption II (2019) in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked.
Review: XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC III Ultra - 10/31/2019 05:23 PM
Extra, extra, extra THICC. Yes, don't get confused in a deja-vu moment as we indeed already reviewed the THICC II, this is the THICC III edition of the XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT. This brother from anothe...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X - 10/29/2019 03:01 PM
MSI released their GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X, a product with a more than capable cooler as well being factory tweaked. The SUPER edition card comes with faster GDDR6 memory but remains pretty much to be...
Review: Gigabyte GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING OC - 10/29/2019 03:01 PM
We review the Gigabyte GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING OC 6G, a product with a triple-fan cooler as well being factory tweaked with a Boost allowance of 1860 MHz. Read article...
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GamingPRO OC - 10/29/2019 03:00 PM
We check out the Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GamingPRO OC, a product with a dual-slot cooler as well being factory tweaked, hence that OC in its name. The SUPER edition card comes with faster GDDR6 m...
Review: GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - MSI, ZOTAC, Gigabyte and PALIT - 10/29/2019 03:00 PM
ZOTAC joins the GTX 1660 SUPER launch party with their AMP edition, a compact product with a capable cooler as well being factory tweaked. The SUPER edition card comes with faster GDDR6 memory but rem...
SpajdrEX
AMD Vanguard
Posts: 2313
Joined: 2006-05-07
AMD Vanguard
Posts: 2313
Joined: 2006-05-07
#5728001 Posted on: 11/05/2019 07:21 PM
There is a missing benchmark picture for
There is a missing benchmark picture for
Graphics card performance 1440p
EDIT.: nevermind, it's together with 1080p resolution
EDIT.: nevermind, it's together with 1080p resolution
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5033
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5033
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5728002 Posted on: 11/05/2019 07:22 PM
This game sure is demanding on GPU power. Though oddly enough, not especially demanding on VRAM. I'm sure performance will get better over time. Not sure how it looks compared to consoles either.
This game sure is demanding on GPU power. Though oddly enough, not especially demanding on VRAM. I'm sure performance will get better over time. Not sure how it looks compared to consoles either.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12959
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 12959
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5728003 Posted on: 11/05/2019 07:22 PM
Insane system req. Its anew gpu killer.
Amd is doing better though. 580 faster than 1070, vega56 faster than 1080 and 5700xt faster than 2070S.
Insane system req. Its anew gpu killer.
Amd is doing better though. 580 faster than 1070, vega56 faster than 1080 and 5700xt faster than 2070S.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38242
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38242
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5728010 Posted on: 11/05/2019 07:27 PM
Roger, on it, yeeaahaw.
@Hilbert Hagedoorn@SpajdrEX - 1440p results are on the wrong page.
Roger, on it, yeeaahaw.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 234
Joined: 2006-11-13
OS: Windows 10 v1909 Pro for Workstation
Processor: i7-9900K, all cores 5.0GHz
RAM: 16GB DDR4 4133MHz
GPU: RTX 2080Ti Watercooled
Resolution: 3440x1440@100Hz, G-Sync
Settings: Enabled the recommended settings in GeForce Experience and adjusted everything that was set to below high to high. So pretty much everything is set to high besides textures that are set to Ultra. Running Windowed Borderless, disabled TAA and FXAA as it makes thing look way too blurry. Enabled 2x MSAA instead, not ideal would need at least 4x to get rid of all the jagginess but performance is just not good enough for more than 2x.
FPS: Seems to be stable 60 FPS on average according to the benchmark. In-game it seems more like 70 FPS. The benchmark dips to 34 FPS and I don't really know why.
Didn't really know what to expect, but this isn't all that impressive to me. Looks similar to my Xbox One X, just more jagginess due to not having native 4K downscaled to 2560x1440. 3440x1440 with 2x MSAA looks worse in-terms of aliasing compared to Xbox One X with native 4K and TAA downscaled to 2560x1440. Besides that the details seems to be somewhat the same.
So I finally have ultrawide and 60 FPS, but aliasing is worse and running textures on ultra and everything else on high don't seem to provide any noticeable improvements when compared to the Xbox One X.
Barely pegs my CPU at all so seems to be crazy GPU bound. My 2080 Ti doesn't provide much else than ultrawide (which is still lower resolution than native 4K on Xbox One X) and 60 FPS instead of 30 FPS. Should be room for much better optimisation here. I would expect my 2080 Ti to be capable of running this at 100 FPS at 3440x1440 with the same overall settings as the Xbox One X. That's clearly not the case here.