Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis review
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.27.168
Download Intel network driver package 27.6
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.8.1 driver download
Prime95 download version 30.8 build 16
Memtest86 9.5 download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.4
FurMark Download v1.31
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.3222


New Forum Topics
Intel Arc A580 Appearing in AotS Benchmark Database, Comparable to RTX 3050/3060 AMD's Possible Delay Ryzen 7000 to September 27th might be BIOS related Windows power plan settings explorer utility [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Release Nemesis 22.6.1 WHQL DriverPack (22.7.1 pending ...) Latest Nvidia Drivers trigger multiple WMI Errors on PC startup and wake up! Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2 In 2024, 1TB DDR5 RAM will be available, followed by DDR5-7200 RAM in 2025 says Samsung AMD Ryzen 7950X, 7900X, 7700X and 7600X Zen4 processors pricing at Canada etailer Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning NZXT N7 Z690, a beautiful motherboard with full cover




Guru3D.com » News » Review: PowerColor Radeon R9 390 PCS+

Review: PowerColor Radeon R9 390 PCS+

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/01/2015 06:28 PM | source: | 25 comment(s)

We benchmark and review the Radeon R9 390 PCS+ from powerColor, obviously the 8GB edition. It comes fitted with a massive triple slot air cooler keeping this product under 70 Degrees C, that's under full gaming load whilst being factory overclocked and fairly silent.

Read the full article right here.
 







« Sharkoon SharkZone M51 Mouse Bungee Bundle · Review: PowerColor Radeon R9 390 PCS+ · Warner Brothers knew about Batman issues for months already »

Related Stories

Review: MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Gaming OC - 06/30/2015 08:43 PM
We check out the MSI GeForce GTX 980 Ti Gaming, the OC edition. high perf, awesome cooling, totally silent, it's factory overclocked and combined with the default variables like the 6 GB graphics mem...

Review: AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - 06/26/2015 09:13 AM
Fury has reigned upon us and as such we review the new Radeon R9 Fury X from AMD. We will benchmark, test and analyze the card in-depth.  There's a lot to tell about this 4096 shader processor based...

Review: Corsair RM 750i PSU - 06/23/2015 02:24 PM
We review the Corsair RM750i GOLD power supply. This silent RMi series PSU comes Gold certified, that means it's 90% efficient at 50% load. Efficiency matters. New feature, you can configure this PSu...

Review: MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G OC - 06/18/2015 01:55 PM
We review the MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G OC edition. The card's equipped with that renamed Hawaii GPU, now called Grenada. Thanks to a huge triple slot air cooler based on the TwinFrozr V design th...

Review: ASUS Radeon R9 380 STRIX - 06/18/2015 01:55 PM
In this review we look at the new ASUS Radeon R9 380 STRIX. Armed with a silent cooler this Tonga GPU based product brings you mainstream gaming at a price of roughly 200 USD - With 2GB and 4GB option...


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13806
Joined: 2004-05-16

#5112256 Posted on: 07/01/2015 09:02 PM
I wouldn't say nvidia is deliberately leaving market segments, but for the past 8 years or so they've been consistently and significantly more expensive than AMD, whether they were #1 or not. Even though nvidia currently own the crown for best overall performance and best performance-per-watt, that's no excuse for their GPUs to cost so much.


They have value-added features. I mean you can argue that you don't value those features, but they do exist and clearly the majority of the market (75%) value those to the point of buying their GPU's despite the cost difference.

schmidtbag
Senior Member



Posts: 6689
Joined: 2012-11-10

#5112265 Posted on: 07/01/2015 09:13 PM
They have value-added features. I mean you can argue that you don't value those features, but they do exist and clearly the majority of the market (75%) value those to the point of buying their GPU's despite the cost difference.

Other than the CUDA cores (and physx, which is CUDA based), what other features does nvidia offer that is unique to them? Most things they have, there is an AMD or open source alternative. Maybe not as polished, but still decent. Actually as of today, I'd say AMD currently has more features that are unique to them, like eyefinity (not sure if nvidia has an equivalent to that), Mantle, and TressFX. I'm not saying those are sought-after features, but my point is, I can't think of any features exclusive to nvidia that people want (that have no alternative).

EDIT:
For the record, I don't dislike nvidia. I bought as many nvidia GPUs as I've bought AMD/ATi.

vbetts
Moderator



Posts: 15143
Joined: 2006-07-04

#5112268 Posted on: 07/01/2015 09:18 PM
Other than the CUDA cores (and physx, which is CUDA based), what other features does nvidia offer that is unique to them? Most things they have, there is an AMD or open source alternative. Maybe not as polished, but still decent. Actually as of today, I'd say AMD currently has more features that are unique to them, like eyefinity (not sure if nvidia has an equivalent to that), Mantle, and TressFX. I'm not saying those are sought-after features, but my point is, I can't think of any features exclusive to nvidia that people want (that have no alternative).


Eyefinity is pretty much just a multiple monitor setup (Nvidia Surround). With 4k and even higher on the rise on a single monitor, Nvidia Surround and Eyefinity really aren't used as much anymore.

And yes AMD has other features such as Mantle or TressFX, however these aren't features that are widely used. Whereas with Nvidia, there are really only 2 main features. That's Cuda(which a good amount of programs use), and Physx(Not a whole lot use Physx, but a major game engine does).

Nvidia does also have HDMI 2.0 support for 4k at 60hz on the 970, 980, and ti I believe?

That being said, none of these features Nvidia has aren't important to me at least. :D Waiting on my Fury X to come in!

Agonist
Senior Member



Posts: 3818
Joined: 2008-10-13

#5112270 Posted on: 07/01/2015 09:23 PM
Other than the CUDA cores (and physx, which is CUDA based), what other features does nvidia offer that is unique to them? Most things they have, there is an AMD or open source alternative. Maybe not as polished, but still decent. Actually as of today, I'd say AMD currently has more features that are unique to them, like eyefinity (not sure if nvidia has an equivalent to that), Mantle, and TressFX. I'm not saying those are sought-after features, but my point is, I can't think of any features exclusive to nvidia that people want (that have no alternative).

EDIT:
For the record, I don't dislike nvidia. I bought as many nvidia GPUs as I've bought AMD/ATi.

Physx is about the only thing I can think of.
I have used both Radeon and Nvidia off and on now since 2008.
Nvidia has surround which is their version of eyefinity. Eyefinity is much more poished and feature savy imho. Have used both.
Most of Nvidias features are nvidia only crap honestly.
Nvidias gpus are quite over priced IMHO.
Been that way since the 8800 gtx launched.
Back when the X1900xtx was out and kicking the hell out of the 7900gtx, especially in DX9c games with HDR lighting and MSAA Nvidia was way more balanced in price point.
Plus Radeon gpus since the HD 7 series really hold their life longer. Just look at the HD 7950/70 R9 280/280x series of gpus. 280x is competing with the GTX 780 in alot of games now.

xIcarus
Senior Member



Posts: 954
Joined: 2010-08-24

#5112275 Posted on: 07/01/2015 09:29 PM
That doesn't make any sense. What is more logical is; AMD knows they have something that performs similar (depending on the game) to the 980 and decides to undercut Nvidia by quite a bit (which just eats into their margins), what does that have to do with nvidia "deliberately leaving market segments for AMD to grab"?


Come on, let's say you have a product and your competitor offers the same product at a better price. You as an owner WILL drop the price in order to stay competitive, otherwise you lose more than you gain.
Nvidia isn't doing this for some reason. I mean the 980 has to be one of the least sold cards in their current lineup. At least currently. I know it sold plenty when it first appeared.

They are greedy faks but I don't think they're actually hoping to sell more 980s.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022