GeForce RTX 3090 Founder review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X TRIO review
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPRO OC review
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD review
GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 TUF Gaming review
GeForce RTX 3080 Founder review
Gigabyte B550 Vision D review
Review: Plextor M6V 256 GB SSD
We have a look at the new Plextor M6V series SSDs. These SSDs are all about value for you hard earned money. This Toshiba based SSD is to be the cost effective product in their value series and comes with the latest iteration of Toshiba Toggle NAND flash memory. We are not disappointed at all in regards to performance versus price.
Read the full review here.
Review: Thecus W4000+ NAS - 07/17/2015 08:41 AM
Today review the W4000+ from thecus, this 4GB RAM enabled NAS unit that doesn't run linux for a change, no Sir its operating system is Windows Storage Server 2012 R2 Essentials (WSS). Armed with WSS ...
Review: Intel Broadwell-H Core i7 5775C processor - 07/15/2015 04:39 PM
We review the new Intel Core i7 5775C processor developed at a 14nm node these processors are a notch more energy friendly. Join us as we look at the performance of this processor in a wide variety of...
Review: Be Quiet! Silent Base 800 with Window - 07/15/2015 04:37 PM
We review the Be Quiet! Silent Base 800 with side panel window The Silent Base 800 Window has not just been given a simple window upgrade. be quiet! has developed its own special solution: the window ...
Review: ASUS Radeon R9 Fury STRIX - 07/14/2015 02:39 PM
Join us as we review the ASUS Radeon R9 Fury STRIX in depth from FPS to FCAT, from noise to heat levels. This cut-down version of the Fiji XT GPU comes with the new ASUS DirectCU III air-cooler. Armed...
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 980 Ti Super Jetstream - 07/10/2015 06:48 PM
We review the Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream edition, a product that will command and conquer as it offers massive game rendering performance at 100% quiet nose levels. Hey and it also looks te...
Kloet075
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2015-03-16
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2015-03-16
#5125852 Posted on: 07/20/2015 07:51 PM
Little typo
I do not think this SSD can perform 300 GB/sec.
Little typo
Sequential and sustained writes hover at 300 GB/sec which is plenty fast, meaning copying an ISO or MKV file will drop down to values at say 200~300 MB/sec.
I do not think this SSD can perform 300 GB/sec.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38953
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38953
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5125855 Posted on: 07/20/2015 07:57 PM
haha, fixed
I do not think this SSD can perform 300 GB/sec.
haha, fixed
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1117
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1117
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5125908 Posted on: 07/20/2015 09:36 PM
Very nice review, as usual...(Although feel free to edit "Vista" out of your review modules as the reference is now getting just a bit long in the tooth...:nerd
I noticed that the AS SSD bench version you're using is an older one (new one is 1.8.xxxx.xxxxx), but the compression bench for my EVO 850 256GB drive was surprisingly much faster than the Plextor in this test...write-compression speeds for the EVO hovered around the 459MB/s mark, whereas your Plextor shows write compression @ ~340MB/s mark. (Read speeds were a tie, here.) The difference of roughly 120MB/s slower (than the EVO) holds in the regular sequential-write benchmark, too. I'm wondering if the EVO actually writes that much faster, or whether this is just an artifact of the newer AS SSD benchmark version....(My EVO is running on the AMD 970a core-logic with the 9/2014 1.3.1.245 AMD SATA drivers in AHCI mode...on the SB950 chipset that supports RAID 0, RAID1, RAID5 and RAID 10)
I'm also wondering why the EVO is warrantied for 5 years & the Plextor for 3...a result of lower longevity expectations, or a difference in estimated cycle calculations? Opinions?
Very nice review, as usual...(Although feel free to edit "Vista" out of your review modules as the reference is now getting just a bit long in the tooth...:nerd
I noticed that the AS SSD bench version you're using is an older one (new one is 1.8.xxxx.xxxxx), but the compression bench for my EVO 850 256GB drive was surprisingly much faster than the Plextor in this test...write-compression speeds for the EVO hovered around the 459MB/s mark, whereas your Plextor shows write compression @ ~340MB/s mark. (Read speeds were a tie, here.) The difference of roughly 120MB/s slower (than the EVO) holds in the regular sequential-write benchmark, too. I'm wondering if the EVO actually writes that much faster, or whether this is just an artifact of the newer AS SSD benchmark version....(My EVO is running on the AMD 970a core-logic with the 9/2014 1.3.1.245 AMD SATA drivers in AHCI mode...on the SB950 chipset that supports RAID 0, RAID1, RAID5 and RAID 10)
I'm also wondering why the EVO is warrantied for 5 years & the Plextor for 3...a result of lower longevity expectations, or a difference in estimated cycle calculations? Opinions?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 10782
Joined: 2012-07-20
Got Vertex 460a 240GB version for W10 testing at 4 Euro lower price. it performs better.
Those manufacturers who can't get there with performance should go for low power consumption as in netbooks any SSD makes huge difference, only if there were some with very low power consumption at idle/load.
Hilbert, do you think you can get SATA power cable with power consumption measurement modification and include real power consumption comparison into testing in time?
because while you stated it eats approximately 4W, their sheet states that 128GB version is 5V & 1A; 256GB requires 5V & 1.5A; and 512GB version supposedly needs 5V & 2A.
That may mean those things are quite power hungry.