Review: Patriot Viper Steel 4000 MHz DDR4

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 01/29/2019 01:36 PM | source: | 20 comment(s)

Today we are reviewing Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 memory. This is a new variant of the Patriot Viper series, which quite surprisingly doesn’t have RGB support (unlike the Viper Gaming RGB kit that we checked out previously). A kit running a 4000 MHz frequency.

Read the full review here.

Related Stories

Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 DUAL OC 8G - 01/24/2019 01:58 PM
GeForce RTX 2080 is expensive, so how will a more affordable version behave then? We test the DUAL 8GB OC model from ASUS, that really isn't even half bad. Read the full review here. ...

Review: Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe SSD - 01/22/2019 05:00 PM
Samsung is back with the 970 EVO NVMe SSD, this round they release the Plus edition which makes use of new vertically stacked NAND and a tweaked controller. The end result is a faster writing EVO seri...

Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti LIGHTNING Z - 01/21/2019 03:03 PM
Join us as we review the all new MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti LIGHTNING Z, the beast has been unleashed with highly clocked factory tweaks and a completely new look. That look entails a gorgeous RGB lighti...

Review: Asus STRIX Fusion Wireless Headset - 01/18/2019 12:43 PM
Today, we review the fourth product in the Asus ROG Fusion headset lineup. Sharing the exact same chassis and pedigree as its cousins, the Fusion Wireless naturally boasts the lack of wires feature to...

Review: be quiet! Dark Rock PRO TR4 (AMD Threadripper) - 01/17/2019 03:07 PM
We review another be quiet! Dark Rock series cooler, this round the PRO TR4 with that TR for Threadripper. The dark tower flagship cooler comes with two radiators, two fans and takes up that cooling p...

4 pages 1 2 3 4

nizzen
Senior Member

Posts: 1094
Joined: 2005-08-05

#5632983 Posted on: 01/29/2019 04:33 PM

I have never understood the allure of high speed memory considering a 1 to 2 fps gain and most benchmarks within the margin of error from regular memory. What does appeal to me is no nonsense (no RGB BS) good cooling design, small footprint and solid lifetime reliability.

You are wrong

fellix
Senior Member

Posts: 180
Joined: 2005-08-31

#5633051 Posted on: 01/29/2019 07:35 PM

Consumer and most professional workloads aren't really bound by memory speeds. While lower latency is always preferable (for single-threaded bottlenecks), architectural and physical limitations of the current DRAM tech present a very steep curve to any meaningful solution. As far as the bandwidth, applications that benefit it already rely excursively on the GPU, while the rest (large DB, data mining, etc.) are way out of scope for the PC users. From my experience, paying premium for anything over DDR4-3200 is not worth it.

Koniakki
Senior Member

Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15

#5633064 Posted on: 01/29/2019 08:08 PM

Thanks boss! Another awesome review!

Also it's articles/reviews like this that remind why and that I glad spend a bit more on my 2x TridentZ 16GB 4266C19 kits (1 used kit and 1 new) running at 4000 17-17-17-38@1.425v memetest stable.

Obviously 3200C14 and 3600C15-16 are usually the sweetspot performance/price wise but 4000-4400c19 aren't bad either. :p

EasternUNO
Junior Member

Posts: 3
Joined: 2019-01-29

#5633156 Posted on: 01/29/2019 10:24 PM

Guys, do you think that I should upgrade RAM in combination with Hashwell-E? currently I have Kingston 16GB KIT DDR4 2133MHz CL14 HyperX Fury Black Series and I have 2 questions. Should I upgrade to 32 GB kit CL15 3000-3200 MHz? Should I use dual or quad channel in combination with ASUS X-99A? It supports DDR4 up to 3200 MHz.

Thanks!

Order_66
Senior Member

Posts: 214
Joined: 2008-07-19

#5633241 Posted on: 01/30/2019 05:49 AM

You are wrong

In cpubound games with 2080/2080ti, higher memoryspeed (higher bandwidth) can increase minimum fps by 10-20%. Read: New Tombraider, BF V etc...

If you trying in non- cpubound and memorybound scenarios, the result is equal to zero.

Running asrock taichi 370 with 8700k oc'd to 5ghz, vega 64, I originally purchased a cheap g.skill 2066 set 16GB from the qvl list for the build, a few months later I decided to upgrade the memory to a g.skill 4266 16gb set B-die also on the qvl list in hopes of getting more performance.

I literally noticed no difference with the upgrade in real world gaming, benchmarks or anything else, maybe a few fps here and there, a slightly quicker boot time, but I did notice a much more responsive bios, never understood that one.

4 pages 1 2 3 4

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.