ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
Review: MSI Creator TRX40 motherboard
It is time to review the next TREX in line, the MSI Creator TRX40. This Threadripper 3000 motherboard is ready for anything from 24 to 64 cores really. It has a beefy 16-phase VRM, you may mount up-to six M.2 SSDs with the help of an add-in card, 10 Gigabit Ethernet, AX wifi. The list goes on and on.
Read the article right here.
« Gigabyte adds a 20Gbps USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 PCIe Expansion Card to lineup · Review: MSI Creator TRX40 motherboard
· Review: Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD - Value at 10 Cents per GB »
Review: ASUS ROG Zenith II Extreme (Threadripper 3000) motherboard - 11/27/2019 11:41 AM
ASUS jumps on the TRX40 as well, meet the all-new ROG Zenith II Extreme all ready to tame that new mega-core Threadripper 3000 processor. In this review, we cock the gun that is the ROG Zenith II Extr...
Review: Gigabyte TRX40 Aorus Xtreme - 11/26/2019 11:24 AM
With all that mega-core galore on the Threadripper 3000 processor releases, a new baby chipset has been born, T-Rex, aka TRX40. In this review we check out the loaded TRX40 Aorus Xtreme from Gigabyte....
Review: Core i9 10980XE processor (Intel 18-core galore) - 11/25/2019 10:01 AM
In this article, we'll review the all-new 18-core Core i9 10980XE from Intel that runs to 4.8 GHz. Despite many announcements, this is the most versatile (in cores) HEDT processor for the consumer ma...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X - 11/22/2019 07:30 PM
MSI released their GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X, a product with a more than capable cooler as well being factory tweaked. The SUPER edition card comes with 12 Gbps GDDR6 graphics memory, however, has only ...
Review: Crucial X8 1TB Portable SSD - USB 3.2 Gen2 at 1 GB/sec - 11/21/2019 02:35 PM
We review the Crucial X8 SSD (1TB). This, by far, among the fastest portable storage to date as it is NVMe based, combined with the DNA of NMVe it can reach 1050 MB/sec over USB 3.2 Gen2. Read the f...
toyo
Senior Member
Posts: 449
Joined: 2008-10-15
Senior Member
Posts: 449
Joined: 2008-10-15
#5736000 Posted on: 11/29/2019 06:42 AM
It's not really important, but the CPUZ single thread scores look kind of weird. There's no way for a 8600 to get higher scores than a 8700k. The 7740X also should not have a way to get that score. This is older silicon with lower boost clocks, although let's be honest, Kaby and Coffee Lake cores are more or less identical. Same goes for the 7900x. Even the 9600K boosts a bit lower than the 8700K, although one could make the argument for newer silicon with the hardware mitigations in it.
By the way, the bench scores differences between CPUZ versions can be dramatic. I know it is not feasible to redo the older parts each CPUZ release, however, you'll end up with the weird chart where the 8700K is somehow on par with the 4790K in single thread performance.
It's not really important, but the CPUZ single thread scores look kind of weird. There's no way for a 8600 to get higher scores than a 8700k. The 7740X also should not have a way to get that score. This is older silicon with lower boost clocks, although let's be honest, Kaby and Coffee Lake cores are more or less identical. Same goes for the 7900x. Even the 9600K boosts a bit lower than the 8700K, although one could make the argument for newer silicon with the hardware mitigations in it.
By the way, the bench scores differences between CPUZ versions can be dramatic. I know it is not feasible to redo the older parts each CPUZ release, however, you'll end up with the weird chart where the 8700K is somehow on par with the 4790K in single thread performance.
kakiharaFRS
Senior Member
Posts: 965
Joined: 2015-11-21
Senior Member
Posts: 965
Joined: 2015-11-21
#5743584 Posted on: 12/21/2019 06:34 PM
Ok got it, took me 3 days to have an useable OS for several reasons...
here's an early feedback 3950x+msi creator
1) the bottom fan spins almost nonstop for me (didn't have time to check if there's a setting for it) but maybe there's a reason...
2) yep MSI didn't lie, I now have 3x M.2 Nvme drives + 6x sata ssds plugged in and working at their expected speeds (unlike most of the motherboards using the ASM1061) this may be why my PCH fan is spinning I also have 8 various USB things (peripherals, drives,soundcard) connected 24/24 at the rear but still have 2 free ports on the rear i/o which is nice
3) I read and watched all the reviews but reading numbers and actually having them in your computer is two different things the motherboard cooling is very important in TRX40 because the cpu draws 200w nonstop for me (stock) I'm at idle is in the 200-240w which is pretty much the double of my previous 9900k, running cinebench I reach 490watts for the system (stock settings everywhere no tweaks) more than my 9900k but since I have 3x more cores it's a good result I think
my games aren't working yet but I'm a bit scared of what the power draw will be with heavy games like borderlands 3, 600+ I guess I already ordered a 1200w psu I don't want to run a 800 psu so close to max power (I had one explode back in the days with sli which destroyed some mb ports and 1 of the videocard)
and this may sound the end of my RGB craze as you need serious cooling for those beastly cpu, for example on my 9900k I couldn't feel any heat coming out of my AIO at idle it was cold or nearly, 3960x at idle you can feel hot air coming out of the rad as soon as you power on
even if I had the money for a 32 cores I feared this and was right, if they make 48-64 cores I don't see with what you are going to cool them custom loop only ?
Ok got it, took me 3 days to have an useable OS for several reasons...
here's an early feedback 3950x+msi creator
1) the bottom fan spins almost nonstop for me (didn't have time to check if there's a setting for it) but maybe there's a reason...
2) yep MSI didn't lie, I now have 3x M.2 Nvme drives + 6x sata ssds plugged in and working at their expected speeds (unlike most of the motherboards using the ASM1061) this may be why my PCH fan is spinning I also have 8 various USB things (peripherals, drives,soundcard) connected 24/24 at the rear but still have 2 free ports on the rear i/o which is nice
3) I read and watched all the reviews but reading numbers and actually having them in your computer is two different things the motherboard cooling is very important in TRX40 because the cpu draws 200w nonstop for me (stock) I'm at idle is in the 200-240w which is pretty much the double of my previous 9900k, running cinebench I reach 490watts for the system (stock settings everywhere no tweaks) more than my 9900k but since I have 3x more cores it's a good result I think
my games aren't working yet but I'm a bit scared of what the power draw will be with heavy games like borderlands 3, 600+ I guess I already ordered a 1200w psu I don't want to run a 800 psu so close to max power (I had one explode back in the days with sli which destroyed some mb ports and 1 of the videocard)
and this may sound the end of my RGB craze as you need serious cooling for those beastly cpu, for example on my 9900k I couldn't feel any heat coming out of my AIO at idle it was cold or nearly, 3960x at idle you can feel hot air coming out of the rad as soon as you power on
even if I had the money for a 32 cores I feared this and was right, if they make 48-64 cores I don't see with what you are going to cool them custom loop only ?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 965
Joined: 2015-11-21
thank you specifically for this one Hilbert, going to read it later saturday but I can't wait to read the review while I wait for my parts because I already ordered one