Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 WHQL driver download
GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.22 Download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download v4.06.10.651
CrystalDiskInfo 8.17 Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 Windows 7 driver download
ReShade download v5.2.2
HWiNFO Download v7.26
7-Zip v22.00 Download


New Forum Topics
[3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) Free to grab: three games at Epic Game Store NVIDIA GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download & Discussion AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 - Driver download and discussion AMD VRR issue LG OLED CX Tensor Core equivalent Likely to Get Embedded in AMD rDNA3 Latest threats, vulnerabilities, exploits to be aware of Windows Defender can Significantly Impact Intel CPU Performance? Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning I don't know which driver to use to get a better FPS.




Guru3D.com » News » Review: Intel Core i5 8600K CPU

Review: Intel Core i5 8600K CPU

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/13/2017 12:16 PM | source: | 96 comment(s)
Review: Intel Core i5 8600K CPU

We'll review the more mainstream six-core proc from Intel as we put the Core i5 8600K through our benchmark paces. This $257 USD proc is again a six-core processor that you will need to seat on a Z370 chipset based motherboard. While it isn't fitted enabled with hyper-threading, it might however be one sweet gaming processor with its all-core turbo to 4.1 GHz and again it being tweakable to that 5.0 GHz on all six cores. Read the full review here.







« GeForce Hot Fix Driver R387.98 · Review: Intel Core i5 8600K CPU · G.Skill launches Trident Z RGB DDR4-4266 32GB Quad-channel Kit »

Related Stories

Preview: The new MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio - 10/12/2017 09:49 AM
Back at Computex 2017 I was chatting with the MSI team, they have been looking for some feedback and back then I told them that while the Twinfrozr design is fantastic in cooling, looks and performanc...

Review: Middle-Earth Shadow of War: PC graphics performance analysis - 10/11/2017 06:32 PM
We'll test Middle-Earth Shadow of War for Windows PC relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. With close to 20 cards, multiple graphics cards are b...

Review: Toshiba TR200 SSD 960GB - Value at 28 cents per GB - 10/11/2017 12:01 PM
We review the latest spawn from Toshiba, in particular the new Toshiba TR200 series SSDs. This new model positions itself in the entry to mainstream SSD segment battling with the 850 EVO and BX300 ser...

Review: Cooler Master MasterCase H500P PC case - 10/10/2017 02:00 PM
We have a new HAF in da house. Join us as we review the Cooler Master MasterCase H500P. The PC case has been redesigned for the year 2017 and that includes usage of a tempered glass side-panel as well...

Review: ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Poseidon - 10/09/2017 09:28 AM
It is time to take and test the best that ASUS puts on the table, the mighty ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Poseidon Platinum. This graphics cards comes 100% customized with factory tweaks, a dual fan a...


20 pages « < 16 17 18 19 > »


Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9800
Joined: 2011-09-21

#5481897 Posted on: 10/15/2017 01:01 PM
@Fox2232 there is a difference in cache though as 2600k has more than 2500k plus the 4 more logical threads. 2500k was a great CPU but got left behind. 2600k is still going strong however. I am not sure about BF1 as I don’t own it. All the games I’ve played recently have not really been an issue except the two Forza games but those had issues no matter the number of threads.

Robbo9999
Senior Member



Posts: 1616
Joined: 2012-10-07

#5481905 Posted on: 10/15/2017 02:29 PM
Not like there is IPC difference between Sandy and Sandy. So, his situation is same with exception of games which already benefit from HT.

OC often can catch to stock Ryzen. In one of cases even getting better. But that's purely based on game selection as one could just take another 10 games where i7-2600k would hold no candle to Ryzen or 10 where it would win.
To have it done properly, one would need to put it into context of engine and year build of given engine got release.
Thanks for that info, looks like OC'd 2600K is about as good for gaming as OC'd AMD 1700 - still going very well for an old CPU!

TieSKey
Senior Member



Posts: 209
Joined: 2015-09-26

#5481918 Posted on: 10/15/2017 03:42 PM
I mean no personal offence to anyone but seriously, this "future proofing" topic is ill approached since the beginning and quite stupid.
The only way to "future proof" is to get the best bang for you buck on an upgradeable platform. To save say 100/150 now and use that to update earlier, reusing as much stuff as possible.
Price/performance is not linear, not even close. So for example, while buying a top end 1080 would get us an "usable" (assuming some heavy gaming) system for say.. 4 years??, we could get the same from 2 cheaper cards every 2 years. (We are talking about future proofing on a budget, if money isn't an issue then upgrading early isn't either)

Maybe it made some sense a couple years ago when cpus upgraded only less than 10% total performance from year to year and we were forced to change mb too, but it certainly doesn't now since Ryzen happened, some node upgrades on both sides are really close and AM4 will last at least until Ryzen2.

leszy
Senior Member



Posts: 327
Joined: 2006-06-06

#5481920 Posted on: 10/15/2017 04:07 PM
You won't see games effectively using more than 4-6 cores/threads for years.

Key word here is effectively.
There are games that can use more than 8threads but they do not get a performance boost over a fast 6 core.
6 core will be the perfect medium for gaming for years.
The first ones are now available. Many more have already been announced. The main target of game developers are consoles. The only way to achieve performance for new 4K consoles (many weak cores) is to fully utilize multi-threading. By programming for 7 threads there is no reason not to go further and provide full scalability.
Last year, Anandtech wrote that no game is scaling over the 4 threads, and that buying a processor with a large number of cores (for gaming) does not make sense. What is the value now their tests and predictions ? Your predictions of the future do not convince me. Probably your crystal ball is faulty ;)

D3M1G0D
Senior Member



Posts: 2068
Joined: 2017-03-10

#5481923 Posted on: 10/15/2017 04:19 PM
I mean no personal offence to anyone but seriously, this "future proofing" topic is ill approached since the beginning and quite stupid.

Yeah, I've always found "future proofing" to be a bit iffy. Essentially, we are making giant assumptions about how the future will pan out and planning our purchases based on those assumptions. Certainly, the focus of Coffee Lake is to add more cores but that doesn't mean game developers will follow through anytime soon (I think Agent is right in that it will probably take several years for games to make effective use of six cores).

IMO, you should buy CPUs mostly based on what you need right now. Coffee Lake is for those who want fast single-core performance, but who also have an immediate need for more cores (e.g., streaming, light productivity, heavy multi-tasking, etc). Buying Coffee Lake even though you don't need the extra cores will likely mean that those extra cores will go underutilized for months (if not years), and by the time games go multi-core there will be faster/better options available (i.e., Ice Lake, Zen 2).

20 pages « < 16 17 18 19 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022