Silicon Power XD80 2 TB NVMe PCIe 3.0 X4 SSD review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution - preview
ASUS ROG Swift PG259QN 360Hz Monitor review
ASRock Z590 Taichi review
Zotac GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gaming OC review
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPRO review
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti founder edition review
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X review
Asus ROG Gladius III (wired and wireless) mouse review
Review: Intel Core i5-11400F processor
We again descend from eight towards six processor cores and twelve threads, this round with the Core i5 11400F, a processor that might be considered the most high-grade value for money in the Rocket Lake-S range from Intel with a listed price of roughly 157 USD.
Read the review here.
Review: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB - 04/15/2021 01:08 PM
Today, we are checking the Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz CL18 (pretty average latency figure) memory in a 32 GB set consisting of two 16 GB modules. This is not the first time we’re looking ...
Review: ASRock Z590 Extreme - 04/13/2021 02:18 PM
This Z590 motherboard from ASRock should be Extreme, as that's in the naming. Realistically this socket LGA1200 and Z590 chipset-based product is a bit more 'normal' than others in terms of feature...
Review: Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC - 04/09/2021 01:44 PM
Gigabyte is back in the house with their familiar Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC. A graphics card aimed at the WQHD (2560x1440) monitor range, armed with a triple fan-based WindForce cooler that remains ...
Review: Corsair K70 RGB TKL CHAMPION Series Keyboard - 04/08/2021 03:00 PM
The Corsair K70 RGB TKL comes from a range of keyboards that we already presented here on guru3d. We reviewed the K70 RGB Rapidfire Mk2, which comes also in a low-profile version. So, the first major ...
Review: Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply - 04/08/2021 10:09 AM
We review the RM650x power supply from Corsair. This is the 2021 update for the RM series and next to an aesthetic overhaul is offered in a silent RMx series that comes with 80plus Gold certification,...
gx-x
Senior Member
Posts: 1482
Joined: 2007-03-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1482
Joined: 2007-03-18
#5908662 Posted on: 04/29/2021 08:32 PM
increasing power limit does the trick, I get ~3600 points in CB20 with my 9700 (non K) it uses ~150W and it reaches up to 74C on some cores. With 9700K in the same system, same power limits (higher than intel spec on both cpus in test) 9700K manages ~3800 since it runs 4.6GHz all core, vs non-K that is running 4.5GHz. Also 9700K (default) was using less power (my sample used ~20W less than non K 9700) and was maxing temps at ~67C (hottest core).
Same cooling, same system.
Aside from that, there is no difference between the two and since I don't care if 9700K can be overclocked to ~5.2GHz (overclock that brings very little to no gain gain in fps on sub $300 GPU) I really don't care for the K. That's because I have been overclocking for past 20 years and now I just don't care to waste time for 2~3fps.
increasing power limit does the trick, I get ~3600 points in CB20 with my 9700 (non K) it uses ~150W and it reaches up to 74C on some cores. With 9700K in the same system, same power limits (higher than intel spec on both cpus in test) 9700K manages ~3800 since it runs 4.6GHz all core, vs non-K that is running 4.5GHz. Also 9700K (default) was using less power (my sample used ~20W less than non K 9700) and was maxing temps at ~67C (hottest core).
Same cooling, same system.
Aside from that, there is no difference between the two and since I don't care if 9700K can be overclocked to ~5.2GHz (overclock that brings very little to no gain gain in fps on sub $300 GPU) I really don't care for the K. That's because I have been overclocking for past 20 years and now I just don't care to waste time for 2~3fps.
olymind1
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: 2011-02-21
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: 2011-02-21
#5909058 Posted on: 05/01/2021 09:38 AM
increasing power limit does the trick, I get ~3600 points in CB20 with my 9700 (non K) it uses ~150W and it reaches up to 74C on some cores. With 9700K in the same system, same power limits (higher than intel spec on both cpus in test) 9700K manages ~3800 since it runs 4.6GHz all core, vs non-K that is running 4.5GHz. Also 9700K (default) was using less power (my sample used ~20W less than non K 9700) and was maxing temps at ~67C (hottest core).
Same cooling, same system.
Aside from that, there is no difference between the two and since I don't care if 9700K can be overclocked to ~5.2GHz (overclock that brings very little to no gain gain in fps on sub $300 GPU) I really don't care for the K. That's because I have been overclocking for past 20 years and now I just don't care to waste time for 2~3fps.
Interesting, i mean if i remember correctly Anandtech tested the 10700 vs 10700K and the K also drew less power, probably because it's less faulty binned chip, like in your case.
By the way i didn't have any K chips and probably never will. I'm not paying extra money for a few hundred MHz. I had an H67 board with i3-2100 went to i5-3550 huge jump, to Ryzen 2600 noticeable jump, but the current pricing on AMD's side not very good, if i want to upgrade i have to pay too much for noticable performance increase in gaming, 2.5-3x price of my cpu for +50% FPS, i would rather go back to intel for an 11400 cpu.
increasing power limit does the trick, I get ~3600 points in CB20 with my 9700 (non K) it uses ~150W and it reaches up to 74C on some cores. With 9700K in the same system, same power limits (higher than intel spec on both cpus in test) 9700K manages ~3800 since it runs 4.6GHz all core, vs non-K that is running 4.5GHz. Also 9700K (default) was using less power (my sample used ~20W less than non K 9700) and was maxing temps at ~67C (hottest core).
Same cooling, same system.
Aside from that, there is no difference between the two and since I don't care if 9700K can be overclocked to ~5.2GHz (overclock that brings very little to no gain gain in fps on sub $300 GPU) I really don't care for the K. That's because I have been overclocking for past 20 years and now I just don't care to waste time for 2~3fps.
Interesting, i mean if i remember correctly Anandtech tested the 10700 vs 10700K and the K also drew less power, probably because it's less faulty binned chip, like in your case.
By the way i didn't have any K chips and probably never will. I'm not paying extra money for a few hundred MHz. I had an H67 board with i3-2100 went to i5-3550 huge jump, to Ryzen 2600 noticeable jump, but the current pricing on AMD's side not very good, if i want to upgrade i have to pay too much for noticable performance increase in gaming, 2.5-3x price of my cpu for +50% FPS, i would rather go back to intel for an 11400 cpu.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: 2011-02-21
Or increase power limit and enable vsync (or some other type of fps limiter or sync), so when the game needs more power for cpu intensive parts it would use slightly more, but most of the time it wouldn't use more just when needed.