Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
Addlink S90 Lite 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4148
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta3 Download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1
CPU-Z download v2.05
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.02.19.2221
GeForce 531.18 WHQL driver download
ReShade download v5.7.0


New Forum Topics
Failed 8,3 Years old WD Red drive 3TB (EFRX) - what now...? 3090 Owner's thread Crucial PCIe 5.0 SSD, T700, Impresses with Compact Heatsink and High Speeds AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.3.1 WHQL - Driver Download and Discussion Wrappers, fix Low FPS I can not get ANY game to launch at 120hz on my 6700XT RTX 4080 Owner's Thread Some GeForce RTX 4070 Graphics cards May get a 16-Pin Power Connection. Any reason not to enable "Prefer Max Performance" for individual game profiles? Thanks, NVIDIA Profile Inspector 2.4.0.3




Guru3D.com » News » Review: HP S750 SSD 1TB

Review: HP S750 SSD 1TB

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/28/2020 11:56 AM | source: | 6 comment(s)
Review: HP S750 SSD 1TB

We test a new HP S750 SSD series, the rather properly volume sized 1024 GB (1 TB), model which we will review. The S750 series offers a compete range of good performing storage products, yet price-competitive at mainstream to high-end class SATA3 performance.

Read the review right here.







« Advertorial: Get Cheapest Windows 10 License Keys at $7.58 for A Limited Period of Time · Review: HP S750 SSD 1TB · Download: NVIDIA GeForce 456.55 WHQL drivers »

Related Stories

Review: Corsair CX750F RGB (750W PSU) - 09/25/2020 01:12 PM
We’re putting the new Corsair CX750F RGB power supply on our test bench today. It received 80 Plus certification already mid-June 2020. We reviewed one of its predecessors back in 2013 (CX600M). Thi...

Review: GeForce RTX 3090 (FE) Founder edition - 09/24/2020 03:16 PM
It is time to review and benchmark the actual premium flagship graphics card, all hail the might that is the GeForce RTX 3090. Armed with a Shader core count that will make your eyebrows frown and a n...

Review: MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X TRIO - 09/24/2020 03:09 PM
We turn to MSI with their new GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X TRIO edition graphics card. factory tweaked, beefy cooler and 24 GB of the fastest GDDR6X memory your money can get you. What will this 10469 Sh...

Review: Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPRO OC - 09/24/2020 03:05 PM
Palit is back with GamingPRO series graphics card, we review the Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPRO OC armed with a muscular cooler and 24 GB of the fastest GDDR6X memory your money can get you. Well, t...

Review: Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD - 09/22/2020 04:00 PM
Samsung has released its first-ever PCIe Gen 4.0 NVMe SSD, meet the 980 PRO that is advertised at blistering performance running towards 7 GB/sec. based on 3-bit per cell writes will Samsung be able t...


2 pages 1 2


DG21
Senior Member



Posts: 120
Joined: 2017-02-27

#5836108 Posted on: 09/28/2020 03:35 PM
I'd rather go for a Crucial MX500 1TB - better price, better performance across the board & more warranty in terms of time (although it 'only' has 360 TBW instead of the 650 TBW @ the hp SSD) and there's even a 2TB model available for sometimes around 200 bucks or below, if you're lucky.

My 850 Pro 1TB from 09/2014 for example has now roughly 28 of 300 TBW (beeing a MLC-SSD with 10! years warranty, where the cells can be overwritten ~10000 times)

But we know, that TLC-cells can be overwritten up to 3000 times, so the max. physical write endurance is in theory @3PBW for a 1TB unit.

-> NO 'normal standard user' (what ever this may be xD) maxes out such amounts of data written. And who does, should turn his eyes on enterprise SSDs anyway...

All in all, i would leave my fingers away from that SSD, but thanks for the testing Hilbert - so we can see wether it's worth buying... :)

toyo
Senior Member



Posts: 439
Joined: 2008-10-15

#5836148 Posted on: 09/28/2020 05:07 PM
But we know, that TLC-cells can be overwritten up to 3000 times, so the max. physical write endurance is in theory @3PBW for a 1TB unit.

It's likely significantly higher, don't ask me how, but Samsung's older products have been able to write 7PB, and that's for the 250GB versions, so a 1TB drive would likely be able to do even better.
Use Google Translate (if you can't understand Russian), this is probably the largest SSD endurance test on the web, at least from what I could find.
https://3dnews.ru/938764

DG21
Senior Member



Posts: 120
Joined: 2017-02-27

#5836238 Posted on: 09/28/2020 09:07 PM
Thanks for the wonderful chart!!! - the SSD with 7.5 PBW is a 850 Pro type which is a MLC-unit.

on www.heise.de they tested 2 of those drives as well - one died after 2.2 PBW and the other after 9.1 PBW(!!!)

https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/SSD-Langzeittest-beendet-Exitus-bei-9-1-Petabyte-3755009.html

And I shot a 850 Pro with 2TB 7 minutes ago for 202 bucks @ebay!!! YEEEEHAAAA!!!!

-> Ok, it has already 83 TBW used, but the warranty is until April 2029 and the 367 TBW left are mooore than enough for me!!! :)

(by the way, with an average max. of 6266.67 TBW out of an 256GB 850 Pro, that 2TB - unit should be able last up to 50 PBW... xD)

toyo
Senior Member



Posts: 439
Joined: 2008-10-15

#5836249 Posted on: 09/28/2020 09:21 PM
Thanks for the wonderful chart!!! - the SSD with 7.5 PBW is a 850 Pro type which is a MLC-unit.

on www.heise.de they tested 2 of those drives as well - one died after 2.2 PBW and the other after 9.1 PBW(!!!)

https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/SSD-Langzeittest-beendet-Exitus-bei-9-1-Petabyte-3755009.html

And I shot a 850 Pro with 2TB 7 minutes ago for 202 bucks @ebay!!! YEEEEHAAAA!!!!

-> Ok, it has already 83 TBW used, but the warranty is until April 2029and the 367 TBW left are mooore than enough for me!!! :)
Yes, it does look like the NAND on the some of these drives like the 850 Pro and the 960/970 Evo was exceptional. The article seems to have been last updated in December 2019, when it says there are 4 more drives still alive (no idea if that's true, which models are those or if it's just some mistranslation). 2PBW for that one 850 Pro is still exceptional IMO, and it also opens the window for speculation, what if other drives can do just as much, since there's such a large amount of variance between the same model?
I assume controller and firmware quality went up, so theoretically there should be no reason for TLC drives like the 970 Evo+ or the 980 "Pro" to do really well, yet the 96 layer+ NAND is not yet properly tested endurance wise. Who knows. And then there's size, we have lots of 1GB drives now, which should increase endurance significantly. Add to this a bit of manual overprovisioning and it should increase even longer to the point you can truly say only the small size will make you replace it.

Mr.Madam
Junior Member



Posts: 1
Joined: 2020-09-29

#5836333 Posted on: 09/29/2020 06:26 AM
Thank you for the wonderful review ^^..
I like Guru3D's reviews, and I enjoy reading them.

PS. Sata3 performance is observed to degrade on the X570 chipset board.
Please check it.
- Seq Max(560MB/s) : X570 500~550MB/s
- 4k Random Max(400MB/s) : X570 200~230MB/s, about -50% down


■ Ref. Test results of SSD community users.
Ref1. 2019.07 - Survey
https://cafe.naver.com/ssdsamo/130976
Ref2, 2020.06 - 850Pro
https://cafe.naver.com/ssdsamo/134670

2 pages 1 2


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023