Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24


New Forum Topics
AMD changes its statements, Ryzen 7000 will consume up to 230W MSI will debut the MEG 342C based on a QD-OLED (3440x1440) display AMD purchases Pensando for $1.9 billion Should I use the latest stable release of "Nvidia Profile Inspector" or the latest pre-release? Free to grab: Bioshock: The Collection at Epic Games Store Cooler Master GM Series Curved Monitors with Quantum Dot Technology AMD reaffirms that the 5.5+ GHz of the Ryzen 7000 in the presentations was achieved without overclocking NVSlimmer - NVIDIA driver slimming utility AMD Announces Ryzen 7000 - passing 5.5 GHz 15% Single Thread perf Increase - RDNA2 Nvidia Shadercache setting.




Guru3D.com » News » Review: Hitman 2016: PC graphics performance benchmarks

Review: Hitman 2016: PC graphics performance benchmarks

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/16/2016 11:58 AM | source: | 151 comment(s)

We peek at the all new Hitman (2016) in our usual ways. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked.

Read the article right here.
  







« Unreal Engine Sizzle Reel 2016 GDC Video · Review: Hitman 2016: PC graphics performance benchmarks · FSP Adds Hydro Series 80 Plus Bronze Power Supplies »

31 pages « < 28 29 30 31


Ieldra



Posts: 3490
Joined: 2007-01-27

#5266403 Posted on: 05/03/2016 05:17 PM
The game is quite good as far as I hear, and seeing it having 60+ fps on everything over a 280x/380 with everything on max, seems like good optimization too. The 80+ fps wall that everything hits looks like a CPU bottleneck at 1080p, you can see the Titan X pull ahead in higher resolutions (as it should).


hahahaha of course you would say that

it runs relatively badly here, doesn't scale well with overclock, it looks like ass, plays like ass, always online-drm, benchmark doesn't even ****ing show you a results screen, dx12 takes 15 minutes to launch after latest patch

it doesn't run badly at 1440p, but I've seen far better looking games running far better.

I was gifted the damn game to benchmark it and now i think im gonna tell the guy to refund it

Redemption80
Senior Member



Posts: 18495
Joined: 2009-01-06

#5266575 Posted on: 05/03/2016 10:51 PM
Hearing about this game it's nearer turd than good, and from personal experience it's aboutabout the same.

It's a decent enough game, but episodic doesn't work for a game like this imho, while technically it's definitely a bit of a mess.

Noisiv
Senior Member



Posts: 8185
Joined: 2010-11-16

#5266590 Posted on: 05/03/2016 11:33 PM
Hearing about this game it's nearer turd than good, and from personal experience it's aboutabout the same.

It's a decent enough game, but episodic doesn't work for a game like this imho, while technically it's definitely a bit of a mess.

Terrible terrible decision.

I wanna episodic - I watch Game of Thrones.

Redemption80
Senior Member



Posts: 18495
Joined: 2009-01-06

#5266619 Posted on: 05/04/2016 01:02 AM
Yep, with this sort of game it just increases the chances that you will stop it and never return to it.

Ieldra
Senior Member



Posts: 3490
Joined: 2007-01-27

#5266628 Posted on: 05/04/2016 01:18 AM
Just tested it:



1440p max settings, no memory limits

I strongly suspect something goes wrong on NVIDIA DX12 at the start of the benchmark; the screen flickers twice and when it loads the average fps displayed is very low compared to DX11 ( 65fps vs ~ 48 fps) then the average goes up very rapidly as you can see in this screenshot












DX12 1300/7000



DX11 1300/7000



DX12 1490/7000



DX11 1490/7000



DX12 1490/8000:


DX11 1490/8000



11% perf increase from 15.5% clock increase

3% perf increase from 14% mem clock increase

For the record this runs roughly as well as EVERYONE'S GONE TO THE RAPTURE, and that game looks way better

31 pages « < 28 29 30 31


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022