Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Corsair HS80 RGB Wireless Headset review
Intel Architecture day 2021: Alder Lake
Intel Architecture day 2021: Xe and XeSS
Review: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 GAMING OC 8G
Onwards to the next one, join us Gigabyte as released their GeForce RTX series graphics cards as well, in this review we look at their brand new GeForce RTX 2080, and in specific the GAMING OC 8G edition.
Read the full review here.
Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X TRIO - 09/19/2018 03:26 PM
You figured we only had founders reviews to show, au contraire my fellow guru, in this review, we'll peek at the Mc Daddy of them all, at launch week MSI is already offering their MSI GeForce RTX 2...
Review: Asus GeForce RTX 2080 Ti RoG Strix - 09/19/2018 03:23 PM
For this review we will look into the ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti RoG Strix, now before we dive into the photo shoot a note, we had a merely hours hands-on time with the product, so this is a preliminar...
Review: HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB 32GB 2933 MHz - 09/18/2018 10:49 AM
We review new HyperX anew Predator DDR4 RGB 32GB 2933 MHz (quad/dual-channel) from HyperX. At 2933 MHz, not the fastest, but this is a 32GB kit that can be tweaked towards 3333 MHz easily. It's p...
Review: Nvidia Turing architecture - GeForce RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti - 09/14/2018 03:00 PM
As time closes in on the actual performance reviews, today we'll be taking an architectural deep dive into the Turing graphics processors, and of course, we can share with you all specifications, y...
Review: Seagate Barracuda Pro 14TB HDD (the Megalodon has arrived) - 09/13/2018 08:34 AM
We review the Megalodon among the HDDs, the Barracuda Pro 14TB from Seagate is unleashed today, that's a 14.000GB HDD folks! This, by far, is the biggest single consumer unit storage device to date...
XenthorX
Senior Member
Posts: 3801
Joined: 2014-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 3801
Joined: 2014-06-17
#5587265 Posted on: 09/20/2018 10:33 PM
@Hilbert Hagedoorn Can you run/record the Star Wars and Futuremark raytracing demo with a RTX 2080 as comparison please? Want some ideas of lower RT core count and how viable other card than Ti are.
Glad to see the Gigabyte 3 fans cooling performing well at full load, i bought the Windforce 2080-ti.
Nvidia is really trading blows with AIB partners... Won't end well for them at this pace.
@Hilbert Hagedoorn Can you run/record the Star Wars and Futuremark raytracing demo with a RTX 2080 as comparison please? Want some ideas of lower RT core count and how viable other card than Ti are.
Glad to see the Gigabyte 3 fans cooling performing well at full load, i bought the Windforce 2080-ti.
Nvidia is really trading blows with AIB partners... Won't end well for them at this pace.
jura11
Senior Member
Posts: 2608
Joined: 2015-03-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2608
Joined: 2015-03-20
#5587304 Posted on: 09/21/2018 12:23 AM
Hi there
My EVGA GTX1080Ti FE with 2113MHz do this V-RAY benchmark in 62 seconds, difference between the OC and normal stock clocks is 4-6 seconds, with stock clocks at 1911MHz time is 66-68s and with 2113MHz OC time is 62s
Difference between 8x and 16x is not so big there in rendering, have run same setup 3*GPUs with 5820k and now with 5960x and difference in GPU based renderers is minimal or in some cases is zero
Yours V-RAY result is pretty good there, what clocks are you running at stock?
My 1080Ti at stock clocks is running 1911MHz
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
If it's of any use to anyone, my EVGA 1080 ti SC2 stock settings (and running on x8 slot), does VRAY benchmark in 66s.
Hi there
My EVGA GTX1080Ti FE with 2113MHz do this V-RAY benchmark in 62 seconds, difference between the OC and normal stock clocks is 4-6 seconds, with stock clocks at 1911MHz time is 66-68s and with 2113MHz OC time is 62s
Difference between 8x and 16x is not so big there in rendering, have run same setup 3*GPUs with 5820k and now with 5960x and difference in GPU based renderers is minimal or in some cases is zero
Yours V-RAY result is pretty good there, what clocks are you running at stock?
My 1080Ti at stock clocks is running 1911MHz
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
dmity84
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2017-07-05
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2017-07-05
#5587463 Posted on: 09/21/2018 11:29 AM
Hi there
My EVGA GTX1080Ti FE with 2113MHz do this V-RAY benchmark in 62 seconds, difference between the OC and normal stock clocks is 4-6 seconds, with stock clocks at 1911MHz time is 66-68s and with 2113MHz OC time is 62s
Difference between 8x and 16x is not so big there in rendering, have run same setup 3*GPUs with 5820k and now with 5960x and difference in GPU based renderers is minimal or in some cases is zero
Yours V-RAY result is pretty good there, what clocks are you running at stock?
My 1080Ti at stock clocks is running 1911MHz
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
Hi,
i see, i thought x8 would have some effect here, it does a little in 3dmark and gaming, but it's not that bad.
Stock core boosts to 1898 or maybe 1911 max at the beginning, memory is at 5005 i think according to Precision XOC.
With +55 core and +530 memory, it was 62 seconds. I probably lost the silicone lottery as it won't go over 50mhz clock in 3dmark the max i get with boost is 1974mhz.
Hi there
My EVGA GTX1080Ti FE with 2113MHz do this V-RAY benchmark in 62 seconds, difference between the OC and normal stock clocks is 4-6 seconds, with stock clocks at 1911MHz time is 66-68s and with 2113MHz OC time is 62s
Difference between 8x and 16x is not so big there in rendering, have run same setup 3*GPUs with 5820k and now with 5960x and difference in GPU based renderers is minimal or in some cases is zero
Yours V-RAY result is pretty good there, what clocks are you running at stock?
My 1080Ti at stock clocks is running 1911MHz
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
Hi,
i see, i thought x8 would have some effect here, it does a little in 3dmark and gaming, but it's not that bad.
Stock core boosts to 1898 or maybe 1911 max at the beginning, memory is at 5005 i think according to Precision XOC.
With +55 core and +530 memory, it was 62 seconds. I probably lost the silicone lottery as it won't go over 50mhz clock in 3dmark the max i get with boost is 1974mhz.
DSC2037
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2018-09-21
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2018-09-21
#5587491 Posted on: 09/21/2018 01:42 PM
Thanks for the review.
Can you please explain us your choice of V-Ray benchmark over let's say Blender GPU benchmark?
V-Ray benchmark is know that it doesn't work on AMD. When you go to their benchmark list, you will not find any Radeons or Vega dedicated graphic cards.Only Nvidia or AMD CPU/APUs or Intel CPUs.
Sounds very fishy to me.
Blender is open source, and both Nvidia and AMD team are working on it to optimize their products to the best that they can, so it fair ground for comparison.
If you go to http://download.blender.org/institute/benchmark/latest_snapshot.html you can see their latest benchmark results.
Thanks for the review.
Can you please explain us your choice of V-Ray benchmark over let's say Blender GPU benchmark?
V-Ray benchmark is know that it doesn't work on AMD. When you go to their benchmark list, you will not find any Radeons or Vega dedicated graphic cards.Only Nvidia or AMD CPU/APUs or Intel CPUs.
Sounds very fishy to me.
Blender is open source, and both Nvidia and AMD team are working on it to optimize their products to the best that they can, so it fair ground for comparison.
If you go to http://download.blender.org/institute/benchmark/latest_snapshot.html you can see their latest benchmark results.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: 2018-05-04
You're missing the point