MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z review
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro OC review
Promo: MS Office 2016 Pro Plus Key For $31.5
Corsair IronClaw RGB mouse review
Corsair Harpoon RGB Wireless mouse review
Corsair M65 RGB ELITE game mouse review
GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)
WD Black NVME SSD (1TB) Review
Seasonic Focus SGX-650 Power Supply review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - December 2018
Reviews: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Articles
Nvidia has released its new Geforce GTX 1070 Ti, we have four articles posted including the FE board, two AIB board, and an SLI review:
Review: GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 2-way FCAT SLI - 11/02/2017 02:02 PM
In this review we'll combine two GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (MSI Gaming editions) graphics cards in a 2-way Multi-GPU setup. We'll obviously focus on Ultra HD performance as well as a micro stuttering anal...
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super Jetstream - 11/02/2017 02:01 PM
We also review the new Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super Jetstream edition. n this review, we test the card from Palit which comes custom cooled and has a custom PCB design with dual-BIOS and a few hi...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Gaming - 11/02/2017 02:01 PM
In this review, we test the card from MSI which comes custom cooled with a TwinFrozr VI cooler and a superb custom PCB design. The card is more silent then ever. Read the article right here....
Review: NZXT H700i PC Case - 10/31/2017 09:36 AM
The new H700i is an advanced series from NZXT, it's a mid-tower with very nice looks, spiffy RGB LED and fan control through a CAM controller. With a new tempered glass side panel, and LED accent lig...
Review: Destiny 2: PC graphics benchmark analysis - 10/25/2017 11:44 AM
We test that PC enhanced Destiny 2 for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We...
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 4481
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 4481
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5488488 Posted on: 11/02/2017 02:43 PM
I didnt realise Vega56 performed that nicely.
Vega56 will probably be as an option considering the fact this card gonna cost way more.
Getting 1070 for lower price might be an alterntive option
I didnt realise Vega56 performed that nicely.
Vega56 will probably be as an option considering the fact this card gonna cost way more.
Getting 1070 for lower price might be an alterntive option
Emille
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
#5488503 Posted on: 11/02/2017 03:29 PM
I don't get it...so people who could have bought a 1080 like 18 months ago...can now get a card that looks like it performs like 5-10% worse in every game, for slightly less money...
The 1070 or 1080 are proportionally so close either side of the 1070ti that I really don't see the point.
So people can now get a 1070 for like $30-50 less or something than the normal asking price of like $400 or whatever it goes for in $U.S, that's the price of a sale any day of the week.
If it was one of those things where it performed 5% faster than the gtx 1080 for the same or less money as other generations refreshes have done, then it would be a great replacement for the 1080, but it is in between 2 cards that are both for the same performance range at 1080p and 1440p.
I don't get it...so people who could have bought a 1080 like 18 months ago...can now get a card that looks like it performs like 5-10% worse in every game, for slightly less money...
The 1070 or 1080 are proportionally so close either side of the 1070ti that I really don't see the point.
So people can now get a 1070 for like $30-50 less or something than the normal asking price of like $400 or whatever it goes for in $U.S, that's the price of a sale any day of the week.
If it was one of those things where it performed 5% faster than the gtx 1080 for the same or less money as other generations refreshes have done, then it would be a great replacement for the 1080, but it is in between 2 cards that are both for the same performance range at 1080p and 1440p.
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18068
Joined: 2009-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 18068
Joined: 2009-01-06
#5488504 Posted on: 11/02/2017 03:33 PM
I didnt realise Vega56 performed that nicely.
Vega56 will probably be as an option considering the fact this card gonna cost way more.
Getting 1070 for lower price might be an alterntive option
Vega56 has an RRP of $400 and this is $450 so I wouldn't say this costs way more, but I do think if this came in at $400 then it would make more sense.
Another great review, but it's hard to be that excited when you can accurately guess the performance before you even read it.
I didnt realise Vega56 performed that nicely.
Vega56 will probably be as an option considering the fact this card gonna cost way more.
Getting 1070 for lower price might be an alterntive option
Vega56 has an RRP of $400 and this is $450 so I wouldn't say this costs way more, but I do think if this came in at $400 then it would make more sense.
Another great review, but it's hard to be that excited when you can accurately guess the performance before you even read it.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3506
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3506
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5488505 Posted on: 11/02/2017 03:38 PM
This reminds me of the i9-7890XE: the only reason it exists is to give AMD the finger. I really don't think Nvidia expects this to sell well, they just don't want the Vega56 being the leader of this performance tier. A 1070 or a 1080 are much more sensible products than this. And because of how new this is, it is going to be a real awkward situation where holiday sales come up and the 1080 becomes cheaper.
From what I noticed, AMD hardware tends to overall get lower numbers than Nvidia (except for power consumption...), but, they scale up more gracefully as resolutions increase, and they take longer to become obsoleted. For example, the HD 7000 series has aged much better than most of the GTX 600 series or even the 700 series (with the 750Ti being the odd one out, which even by today's standards is still one of the best products in terms of performance-per-watt). But, the 600 and 700 series were overall better products at their release date.
Or, spend an additional $0-50 and get a 1080.
This reminds me of the i9-7890XE: the only reason it exists is to give AMD the finger. I really don't think Nvidia expects this to sell well, they just don't want the Vega56 being the leader of this performance tier. A 1070 or a 1080 are much more sensible products than this. And because of how new this is, it is going to be a real awkward situation where holiday sales come up and the 1080 becomes cheaper.
I didnt realise Vega56 performed that nicely.
From what I noticed, AMD hardware tends to overall get lower numbers than Nvidia (except for power consumption...), but, they scale up more gracefully as resolutions increase, and they take longer to become obsoleted. For example, the HD 7000 series has aged much better than most of the GTX 600 series or even the 700 series (with the 750Ti being the odd one out, which even by today's standards is still one of the best products in terms of performance-per-watt). But, the 600 and 700 series were overall better products at their release date.
Getting 1070 for lower price might be an alterntive option
Or, spend an additional $0-50 and get a 1080.
SHS
Senior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: 2001-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: 2001-05-02
#5488510 Posted on: 11/02/2017 03:47 PM
Vega56 has an RRP of $400 and this is $450 so I wouldn't say this costs way more, but I do think if this came in at $400 then it would make more sense.
Another great review, but it's hard to be that excited when you can accurately guess the performance before you even read it.
You want look on newegg the price just drop down Vega 56 $399 and Vega 64 $499 cool but I'm going to hold for black friday sale
Vega56 has an RRP of $400 and this is $450 so I wouldn't say this costs way more, but I do think if this came in at $400 then it would make more sense.
Another great review, but it's hard to be that excited when you can accurately guess the performance before you even read it.
You want look on newegg the price just drop down Vega 56 $399 and Vega 64 $499 cool but I'm going to hold for black friday sale
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18068
Joined: 2009-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 18068
Joined: 2009-01-06
#5488516 Posted on: 11/02/2017 03:57 PM
Yeah I know, I just rounded up $399.99 to $400.
You want look on newegg the price just drop down Vega 56 $399 and Vega 64 $499 cool but I'm going to hold for black friday sale
Yeah I know, I just rounded up $399.99 to $400.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11318
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11318
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5488517 Posted on: 11/02/2017 04:00 PM
Small typo
A partially disabled GP104 GPU will have (GTX 1070 Ti):
1,432 CUDA/Shader/Stream processors
Small typo
A partially disabled GP104 GPU will have (GTX 1070 Ti):
1,432 CUDA/Shader/Stream processors
SHS
Senior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: 2001-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: 2001-05-02
#5488525 Posted on: 11/02/2017 04:26 PM
I was going wait but after short talk with somebody, I just went ahead and order a Vega 56 now being there very little over different from GTX 1070 Ti to bad Nvidia didn't keep it first MSRP of $430 and any case I going get one hell up grade from what I currently have now LoL I guest I have update my profile from HD 7870 to Vega 56
Yeah I know, I just rounded up $399.99 to $400.
I was going wait but after short talk with somebody, I just went ahead and order a Vega 56 now being there very little over different from GTX 1070 Ti to bad Nvidia didn't keep it first MSRP of $430 and any case I going get one hell up grade from what I currently have now LoL I guest I have update my profile from HD 7870 to Vega 56
Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3643
Joined: 2004-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 3643
Joined: 2004-09-28
#5488526 Posted on: 11/02/2017 04:26 PM
Nice review Hilbert and I agree that the 1070 might actually be the better deal because its not that much slower than a Vega 56 when not OCed depending on the game that you are playing. Also Boss any new info with Overclocking a Vega 56? I'm curious to see on how well an Overclocked 1070 Ti compares to a OC'ed Vega 56 and 64 because it is very close to a Vega 64 in terms of performance and in some cases out performing it by a few FPS here and there depending on the game yet again.
Nice review Hilbert and I agree that the 1070 might actually be the better deal because its not that much slower than a Vega 56 when not OCed depending on the game that you are playing. Also Boss any new info with Overclocking a Vega 56? I'm curious to see on how well an Overclocked 1070 Ti compares to a OC'ed Vega 56 and 64 because it is very close to a Vega 64 in terms of performance and in some cases out performing it by a few FPS here and there depending on the game yet again.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9038
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9038
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5488528 Posted on: 11/02/2017 04:27 PM
From what I noticed, AMD hardware tends to overall get lower numbers than Nvidia (except for power consumption...), but, they scale up more gracefully as resolutions increase, and they take longer to become obsoleted. For example, the HD 7000 series has aged much better than most of the GTX 600 series or even the 700 series (with the 750Ti being the odd one out, which even by today's standards is still one of the best products in terms of performance-per-watt). But, the 600 and 700 series were overall better products at their release date.
Something about Kepler held it back later in it's life. 750ti is Maxwell so that is why it was not effected. Keep in mind Kepler is basically a Fermi die shrink. Fermi is not doing well now either. How well is TreaScale doing right now?
From what I noticed, AMD hardware tends to overall get lower numbers than Nvidia (except for power consumption...), but, they scale up more gracefully as resolutions increase, and they take longer to become obsoleted. For example, the HD 7000 series has aged much better than most of the GTX 600 series or even the 700 series (with the 750Ti being the odd one out, which even by today's standards is still one of the best products in terms of performance-per-watt). But, the 600 and 700 series were overall better products at their release date.
Something about Kepler held it back later in it's life. 750ti is Maxwell so that is why it was not effected. Keep in mind Kepler is basically a Fermi die shrink. Fermi is not doing well now either. How well is TreaScale doing right now?
SHS
Senior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: 2001-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: 2001-05-02
#5488533 Posted on: 11/02/2017 04:38 PM
Not really here in USA the price did drop to today on GTX 1070 and are now at same cost but that was ZOTAC ITX size card
Nice review Hilbert and I agree that the 1070 might actually be the better deal because its not that much slower than a Vega 56 when not OCed depending on the game that you are playing. Also Boss any new info with Overclocking a Vega 56? I'm curious to see on how well an Overclocked 1070 Ti compares to a OC'ed Vega 56 and 64 because it is very close to a Vega 64 in terms of performance and in some cases out performing it by a few FPS here and there depending on the game yet again.
Not really here in USA the price did drop to today on GTX 1070 and are now at same cost but that was ZOTAC ITX size card
Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3643
Joined: 2004-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 3643
Joined: 2004-09-28
#5488536 Posted on: 11/02/2017 04:44 PM
Yeah You are correct after looking at prices on Newegg. The cheapest 2 cards that I found is the Zotac Mini like you said @ $404 bucks and the MSI armored edition at $400. The rest are around $440-450.
Not really here in USA the price did drop to today on GTX 1070 and are now at same cost but that was ZOTAC ITX size card
Yeah You are correct after looking at prices on Newegg. The cheapest 2 cards that I found is the Zotac Mini like you said @ $404 bucks and the MSI armored edition at $400. The rest are around $440-450.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 190
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 190
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5488550 Posted on: 11/02/2017 05:15 PM
This reminds me of the i9-7890XE: the only reason it exists is to give AMD the finger. I really don't think Nvidia expects this to sell well, they just don't want the Vega56 being the leader of this performance tier. A 1070 or a 1080 are much more sensible products than this. And because of how new this is, it is going to be a real awkward situation where holiday sales come up and the 1080 becomes cheaper.
From what I noticed, AMD hardware tends to overall get lower numbers than Nvidia (except for power consumption...), but, they scale up more gracefully as resolutions increase, and they take longer to become obsoleted. For example, the HD 7000 series has aged much better than most of the GTX 600 series or even the 700 series (with the 750Ti being the odd one out, which even by today's standards is still one of the best products in terms of performance-per-watt). But, the 600 and 700 series were overall better products at their release date.
Or, spend an additional $0-50 and get a 1080.
+1 for every aspect.
This reminds me of the i9-7890XE: the only reason it exists is to give AMD the finger. I really don't think Nvidia expects this to sell well, they just don't want the Vega56 being the leader of this performance tier. A 1070 or a 1080 are much more sensible products than this. And because of how new this is, it is going to be a real awkward situation where holiday sales come up and the 1080 becomes cheaper.
From what I noticed, AMD hardware tends to overall get lower numbers than Nvidia (except for power consumption...), but, they scale up more gracefully as resolutions increase, and they take longer to become obsoleted. For example, the HD 7000 series has aged much better than most of the GTX 600 series or even the 700 series (with the 750Ti being the odd one out, which even by today's standards is still one of the best products in terms of performance-per-watt). But, the 600 and 700 series were overall better products at their release date.
Or, spend an additional $0-50 and get a 1080.
+1 for every aspect.
CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member
Posts: 1985
Joined: 2013-02-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1985
Joined: 2013-02-26
#5488584 Posted on: 11/02/2017 06:39 PM
Thanks HH for these 1070Ti reviews!
Performance wise 1070Ti is well positioned card with Vega 56 on it's aim, but can't say the same for the 1070Ti price tag. If I had need to spend that kind of money on some NVidia card atm I'll just add few more bucks and buy 1080.
One more thing I don't like about 1070Ti: it seems to me that so far all 1070Ti's are using Micron memory chips = not that great memory OC capabilities and for sure that limits OC potential of these cards, memory OC ends below/around 9000. With Samsung or even Hynix chips @ max OC both 1070Ti and 1080 would be maybe 2 to 3 % close.
Thanks HH for these 1070Ti reviews!
Performance wise 1070Ti is well positioned card with Vega 56 on it's aim, but can't say the same for the 1070Ti price tag. If I had need to spend that kind of money on some NVidia card atm I'll just add few more bucks and buy 1080.
One more thing I don't like about 1070Ti: it seems to me that so far all 1070Ti's are using Micron memory chips = not that great memory OC capabilities and for sure that limits OC potential of these cards, memory OC ends below/around 9000. With Samsung or even Hynix chips @ max OC both 1070Ti and 1080 would be maybe 2 to 3 % close.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6499
Joined: 2010-11-16
Great review. Really appreciate you keep hammering frametime graphs, keeping NV/AMD in check on that front.
Good alternative to GTX 1080. I always felt that 1070 is slightly more under-powered than necessary.
ps
page 1: "1070 Ti series to canalize the 1080"
pps
24" 25x14/16 monitor being a perfect fit... come one, at least 27''