Review: Dying Light graphics performance

#5013296 Posted on: 02/13/2015 11:51 AM

---

A lot of pricks lately.
Thanks for the review HH.

#5013302 Posted on: 02/13/2015 12:10 PM

---

A lot of pricks lately.
Thanks for the review HH.

Ya , I noticed that also ... a lot of bad ppl lately here and also on steam ! But he does have a point ... not all of us can afford an Intel I7 cpu ... I still game on my old 1090T proccesor , meaning I will lose around 7 - 10 fps easily . I am not asking to change the method how review are made ! but this is a maximum number of fps that you can achieve. This is way when I have a demanding game I also install fraps and see what my FPS are so I can finetune it.

The spoiled brat should do that also .... and remember ppl ... not all in live goes your way you will realize that later in life

#5013304 Posted on: 02/13/2015 12:12 PM

---

terrible review and i go into detail why in a post i just made. i wish i would have seen this first or i would of just posted it here but in a nutshell, their test system is stupid, because normal people dont have bleeding edge systems, AND IF THEY DID they dont have old vid cards in them!

i cant post links yet because i just registered simply because of how insanely mad this dying light video card review made me, so please click my name and view the only thread i have "an article on how websites review hardware"

or lets try posting links workaround, and just copy that into your browser
forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=396981

Yep, lets use low-mid range spec cpu and motherboards so that when we try to get accurate results on a GPU, we can experience wonderful bottlenecks allowing 25% of GPU results all to show the same FPS and skew genuine results.

When you test a product you do not want any other peripheral in use to hinder the results of your test so you use high end.

I really can't see why you felt the need to write a reply just to say "terrible review". There are better and more polite ways to express disatisfaction without sounding rude. And throwing in profanities in your other post doesn't help you in anyway. I'd suggest you grow up and try to be sensible in your replies. "Stupid Setup"? Welcome to the enthusiast forum, there are thousands of people with Hilberts same equipment.

Last edited by bryguy9021; Today at 10:36. Reason: forgot sarcasam

Leave your sarcasm out. It doesn't help you.

#5013306 Posted on: 02/13/2015 12:15 PM

---

The benchmark was to show the differences in GPU performance not "whole system performance on a mediocre pc". There are sites that test the diff. CPU performance. Just do your research on why the sites use "bleeding edge" hardware.

#5013312 Posted on: 02/13/2015 12:26 PM

---

system specs directly effect how games run. a 8 core hyper threaded i7????...the game running on a ssd!!???...ludicrous amounts of the fastest ram on earth? that is not just testing the gpu. the gpu is not running 100% of the game. how the card runs in a bleeding edge pc, does not tell me how the card runs in the real world.

im actually kind of upset they are using a i7 and not a xenon. i mean...why stop at stupid specs. they could of went 1 more step up!!!

if you dont have the system used in those tests, all the numbers mean NOTHING to you.

my point was, if your gonna test 30 video cards...hell test 30 diff pc configurations as well..but AT BARE MINIMUM test the minimum and recommended specs also.

i dont have a mediocre pc. my pc exceeds the recommended requirements for every single game out to date. but i promise you, i run the same tests as this reviewer, i dont get close to him,...cpu/ram makes big differences.

second point is what good does it do to know how fast a super computer runs something when i dont have a super computer? i am simply saying...we need real world tests,more centered on the specs the manuf. gives... or more of a variety in general

i will concede that they give the GPU every possible advantage..but the results are inapplicable to the rest of the world