Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
Review: Dying Light graphics performance
In this article we benchmark Dying Light - almost 30 graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. We'll also look at frametimes, graphics memory and a thing or two more.
Read the full article here.
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 960 Super JetStream - 02/12/2015 10:24 AM
We review the Palit GeForce GTX 960 Super JetStream, a product that is easily in my top 3 of the best GeForce GTX 960 cards as it performs the fastest, it is the most silent one, and it has just gorge...
Review: Corsair Hydro H110i GT Liquid Cooling - 02/10/2015 03:55 PM
In this review we look at the all new Corsair H110i GT Hydro Series Liquid cooler. This updated revision CPU cooler is compatible with Corsair's LINK software. This allows you to program, customize a...
Review: ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 980 Matrix Platinum - 02/05/2015 12:46 PM
Join us in a review on the GeForce GTX 980 Matrix Platinum, yes ASUS is back in da house with a Republic Of Gamers product. This product has been designed for the true aficionados that sub-zero cool t...
Review: ASRock Fatal1ty X99X Killer - 02/03/2015 10:23 AM
We review the ASRock Fatal1ty X99X Killer motherboard, this high-end X99 motherboard from ASRock has lovely features yet remains priced competitively in the 225 EURO / 279 USD margin. It has good twea...
Review: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC - 01/30/2015 10:39 AM
In this review we check out the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC. This product is slightly cheaper opposed to the G1 gaming version, it remains among the most silent of all the cards we tested...
bryguy9021
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-02-13
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-02-13
#5013287 Posted on: 02/13/2015 11:25 AM
terrible review and i go into detail why in a post i just made. i wish i would have seen this first or i would of just posted it here
but in a nutshell, their test system is stupid, because normal people dont have bleeding edge systems, AND IF THEY DID they dont have old vid cards in them!
i cant post links yet because i just registered simply because of how insanely mad this dying light video card review made me, so please click my name and view the only thread i have "an article on how websites review hardware"
or lets try posting links workaround, and just copy that into your browser
forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=396981
terrible review and i go into detail why in a post i just made. i wish i would have seen this first or i would of just posted it here
but in a nutshell, their test system is stupid, because normal people dont have bleeding edge systems, AND IF THEY DID they dont have old vid cards in them!
i cant post links yet because i just registered simply because of how insanely mad this dying light video card review made me, so please click my name and view the only thread i have "an article on how websites review hardware"
or lets try posting links workaround, and just copy that into your browser
forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=396981
bryguy9021
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-02-13
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-02-13
#5013289 Posted on: 02/13/2015 11:29 AM
"Our test system is based on the eight-core Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition with Haswell-E based setup on the X99 chipset platform. This setup is overclocked to 4.40 GHz on all cores. Next to that we have energy saving functions disabled for this motherboard and processor (to ensure consistent benchmark results). We use Windows 8.1 all patched up. Each card runs on the same PC with the same operating system clone.
GeForce cards use the latest 347.52 driver.
AMD Radeon graphics cards we used the latest 14.12 Omega driver. "
in response to system specs of their review
edit: they forgot to mention it is gold plated and diamond encrusted
"Our test system is based on the eight-core Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition with Haswell-E based setup on the X99 chipset platform. This setup is overclocked to 4.40 GHz on all cores. Next to that we have energy saving functions disabled for this motherboard and processor (to ensure consistent benchmark results). We use Windows 8.1 all patched up. Each card runs on the same PC with the same operating system clone.
GeForce cards use the latest 347.52 driver.
AMD Radeon graphics cards we used the latest 14.12 Omega driver. "
in response to system specs of their review
edit: they forgot to mention it is gold plated and diamond encrusted
Hari_Seldon
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2012-03-26
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2012-03-26
#5013292 Posted on: 02/13/2015 11:42 AM
The bottom index and title are wrong: page 7 says fullHD but is 1600x1200, page 8 says WQHD & UHD but is 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. No UHD.
And I was hoping for a GTX970 SLI / VRAM FCAT experience.
The bottom index and title are wrong: page 7 says fullHD but is 1600x1200, page 8 says WQHD & UHD but is 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. No UHD.
And I was hoping for a GTX970 SLI / VRAM FCAT experience.
bryguy9021
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-02-13
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 2015-02-13
#5013295 Posted on: 02/13/2015 11:50 AM
i dont have sli gtx 970s (yet) but i can tell you from my experience, that you must run the view distance all the way down for acceptable FPS and absolutely NO DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY WHATSOEVER...nvidia depth of field is broken and needs disabled. and vsync is broken and will only lock at 60fps or 30fps (unless you have a higher refresh monitor, or a gsync)and this makes for MASSIVE stuttering from constant jumps between 30 and 60 fps.....under those settings i have amazing results always over 70fps (highs over 100) on ultra quality everything else with HBAO+ at 1920x1080. however, and i think this is a problem in my windows cause my old 260 was suffering from this too in games, my pc will hard freeze for an entire second and the sound will go EHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!.but i have not experience any microstutters or input lag. i have not heard from the latest patch but friends tell me SLI has no impact on this game at all as this game is TERRIBLY optimized.
there are alot of youtube videos on this subject, and they all say what i just said for optimal performace on higher end cards
edit. should mention i am also using the dying light launcher tool from nexus mods, and have stupid film grain disabled, as well as spatter effects on my screen (cause its annoying when it rains). absolutely essential tool
i dont have sli gtx 970s (yet) but i can tell you from my experience, that you must run the view distance all the way down for acceptable FPS and absolutely NO DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY WHATSOEVER...nvidia depth of field is broken and needs disabled. and vsync is broken and will only lock at 60fps or 30fps (unless you have a higher refresh monitor, or a gsync)and this makes for MASSIVE stuttering from constant jumps between 30 and 60 fps.....under those settings i have amazing results always over 70fps (highs over 100) on ultra quality everything else with HBAO+ at 1920x1080. however, and i think this is a problem in my windows cause my old 260 was suffering from this too in games, my pc will hard freeze for an entire second and the sound will go EHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!.but i have not experience any microstutters or input lag. i have not heard from the latest patch but friends tell me SLI has no impact on this game at all as this game is TERRIBLY optimized.
there are alot of youtube videos on this subject, and they all say what i just said for optimal performace on higher end cards
edit. should mention i am also using the dying light launcher tool from nexus mods, and have stupid film grain disabled, as well as spatter effects on my screen (cause its annoying when it rains). absolutely essential tool
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 123
Joined: 2015-02-13
I don't know what the hell is going on. All the reviews that still use the 780 keeps showing that the 780 ages really really bad compared to the other Kepler alternatives. Seriously starting to regret getting the 780. Oh well I have a 970 coming tomorrow that I'm getting from a friend.