Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi review
Mountain Makalu Max mouse review
Review: Dying Light graphics performance
In this article we benchmark Dying Light - almost 30 graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. We'll also look at frametimes, graphics memory and a thing or two more.
Read the full article here.
« Hatred - System Requirements · Review: Dying Light graphics performance
· ASUS GeForce GTX 960 Mini »
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 960 Super JetStream - 02/12/2015 10:24 AM
We review the Palit GeForce GTX 960 Super JetStream, a product that is easily in my top 3 of the best GeForce GTX 960 cards as it performs the fastest, it is the most silent one, and it has just gorge...
Review: Corsair Hydro H110i GT Liquid Cooling - 02/10/2015 03:55 PM
In this review we look at the all new Corsair H110i GT Hydro Series Liquid cooler. This updated revision CPU cooler is compatible with Corsair's LINK software. This allows you to program, customize a...
Review: ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 980 Matrix Platinum - 02/05/2015 12:46 PM
Join us in a review on the GeForce GTX 980 Matrix Platinum, yes ASUS is back in da house with a Republic Of Gamers product. This product has been designed for the true aficionados that sub-zero cool t...
Review: ASRock Fatal1ty X99X Killer - 02/03/2015 10:23 AM
We review the ASRock Fatal1ty X99X Killer motherboard, this high-end X99 motherboard from ASRock has lovely features yet remains priced competitively in the 225 EURO / 279 USD margin. It has good twea...
Review: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC - 01/30/2015 10:39 AM
In this review we check out the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 WindForce 2X OC. This product is slightly cheaper opposed to the G1 gaming version, it remains among the most silent of all the cards we tested...
Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 4196
Joined: 2004-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 4196
Joined: 2004-09-28
#5013890 Posted on: 02/14/2015 06:30 AM
I am amazed on how well a 690 is doing at 1440p just a tad faster than a 970. Considering on how old the 690 is it still a beast of a card.
I am amazed on how well a 690 is doing at 1440p just a tad faster than a 970. Considering on how old the 690 is it still a beast of a card.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 10558
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 10558
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5013910 Posted on: 02/14/2015 08:54 AM
I thought AMD said they would devote some resources to fix their frametime issues... but is it my imagination or is this game optimized like crap to begin with? 54fps for the GTX 980 in 1440p, no way this game is optimized, even if the card drivers aren't either.
I thought AMD said they would devote some resources to fix their frametime issues... but is it my imagination or is this game optimized like crap to begin with? 54fps for the GTX 980 in 1440p, no way this game is optimized, even if the card drivers aren't either.
Mineria
Senior Member
Posts: 5537
Joined: 2007-05-05
Senior Member
Posts: 5537
Joined: 2007-05-05
#5013947 Posted on: 02/14/2015 12:13 PM
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/dying_light_vga_graphics_performance_review,5.html
Let's have a look at the AMD Radeon R9 290X. As you can see if you compare with the GeForce GTX 980, the resul is close to similar, however we do see more smaller spikes. These are below 25ms though, thus not visible.
If frametimes that low give you stuttering something else up with your system.
I thought AMD said they would devote some resources to fix their frametime issues... but is it my imagination or is this game optimized like crap to begin with? 54fps for the GTX 980 in 1440p, no way this game is optimized, even if the card drivers aren't either.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/dying_light_vga_graphics_performance_review,5.html
Let's have a look at the AMD Radeon R9 290X. As you can see if you compare with the GeForce GTX 980, the resul is close to similar, however we do see more smaller spikes. These are below 25ms though, thus not visible.
If frametimes that low give you stuttering something else up with your system.
Emille
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
#5014014 Posted on: 02/14/2015 04:03 PM
What the hell are you people talking about.
I clearly stated that other people were saying that a 980 was slower or only equal to a 780ti, and said;
I have highlighted the obvious quotation marks for your convenience.
When the 980 came out tons of 780ti owners on this forum were claiming that an overclocked 780ti was faster than a 980...I can't have been the only one who noticed it.
What the hell are you people talking about.
I clearly stated that other people were saying that a 980 was slower or only equal to a 780ti, and said;
I bet all the "980 is slower than a 780ti" people might be eating their words.
I have highlighted the obvious quotation marks for your convenience.
When the 980 came out tons of 780ti owners on this forum were claiming that an overclocked 780ti was faster than a 980...I can't have been the only one who noticed it.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
I bet all the "980 is slower than a 780ti" people might be eating their words after the latest slew of games.
I never had any regrets coming from my 780 as Dragon Age Inquisition, Farcry 4, Dying Light and every other game I've played since launch have run at 60 frames sans supersampling.
I dont know where you have got this as all review was showing it over performed the 780TI. ( just peoples was expect more ).
But for take your words:
I bet many peoples who was think that the "290x is slower of the 780Ti" might be eating their words right now.