Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
Corsair K95 RGB PLATINUM XT review
AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G review
Endgame XM1 gaming mouse review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - December 2019
Review: DX11 - Deus Ex: Mankind Divided PC Graphics performance
We look at Deus Ex: Mankind Divided for the PC. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked as well as an FCAT run and VRAM monitoring.
** August 25th - Added GTX 970 and 980 results
Read this preliminary article right here.
Review: Cooler Master MasterLiquid Maker 92 - 08/24/2016 07:18 AM
In this article we review that wicked looking Cooler Master MasterLiquid Maker 92 CPU cooler, the new compact and flexible AIO liquid cooler will be available soon in a rotating model with looks like ...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X 3GB - 08/22/2016 12:45 PM
We take the new 3GB model GeForce GTX 1060 from MSI for a test-ride as we look at their new Gaming X 3GB model. A card aimed at the budget minded consumer with a price-tag at (219 USD) compared to the...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1060 6GT OC - 08/20/2016 08:15 AM
We'll review the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 6GT OC 6GB model, aimed at the budget minded consumer this card is much cheaper (249 USD) compared to the GAMING edition, yet comes factory overclocked but not w...
Review: ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX Gaming - 08/18/2016 02:56 PM
We review the ASUS Republic Of Gamers GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING. It's factory customized and comes all tweaked and cooled so much better opposed to the founders edition. And it looks fantastic as...
Review: Crucial MX300 750GB SSD - 08/16/2016 08:53 AM
We review the 750 GB version of the Crucial MX300 SSD series. The MX300 has been updated with three new volume sizes, this updated series should offer a bit more storage space yet remain more price-co...
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-05
Senior Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-05
#5325726 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:27 PM
This game really pushes current hardware to it's knees.
And just look at the 780 Ti. Once a mighty card and now, it can barely keep up with a 380x. It has aged really badly...
This game really pushes current hardware to it's knees.
And just look at the 780 Ti. Once a mighty card and now, it can barely keep up with a 380x. It has aged really badly...
Mica
Member
Posts: 36
Joined: 2012-09-05
Member
Posts: 36
Joined: 2012-09-05
#5325728 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:29 PM
RX480 beats GTX1060 once again, but this time in a DirectX11 game. Glad to see that.
RX480 beats GTX1060 once again, but this time in a DirectX11 game. Glad to see that.
EngEd
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2015-06-17
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 2015-06-17
#5325729 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:33 PM
LoL I think as usual, this game is not yet optimized. Just like the division at launch. A few more patches and better drivers should give us better fps at 1440p and 4k res.
If dx 12 boosts fps by 20% its good, but I still have a bad feeling about this game's graphics engine and optimization. As of today of course. We shall se, we shall indeed see.
LoL I think as usual, this game is not yet optimized. Just like the division at launch. A few more patches and better drivers should give us better fps at 1440p and 4k res.
If dx 12 boosts fps by 20% its good, but I still have a bad feeling about this game's graphics engine and optimization. As of today of course. We shall se, we shall indeed see.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12471
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12471
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5325731 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:36 PM
Yeah, the Dawn Engine is a modified version of the Glacier engine -- AMD hardware has always ran exceptionally well on Glacier -- Dawn is mirroring that.
RX480 beats GTX1060 once again, but this time in a DirectX11 game. Glad to see that.
Yeah, the Dawn Engine is a modified version of the Glacier engine -- AMD hardware has always ran exceptionally well on Glacier -- Dawn is mirroring that.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 15934
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 15934
Joined: 2009-02-25
#5325732 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:38 PM
Albeit based on the same game rendering engine that was used in the previous edition the game actually looks good at both HIGH and Ultra quality settings, especially Ultra has very nice sharp textures but annihilates any graphics card.
If you mean DirectX 11 then yep.
If it's the game engine that is referenced then Human Revolution allegedly used a altered Crystal engine that were mainly used for the Crystal Dynamics teams Tomb Raider franchise and now this sequel uses a new engine called Dawn although from what I just read it's core is a heavily updated Glacier engine from the previous game so eh I guess it's technically correct even if it's a fairly big overhaul in terms of features offered or how to say.
Could have done with some extra time for the PC version, yeah a delayed release would have been annoying too but I'd prefer a better optimized and bug-tested final product personally but eh that's up to the publisher to control mainly.
Nixxes is usually very supportive though as seen with multiple updates for the original Human Revolution - though the updated version is a bit so-so but handled by Eidos directly from my understanding. - and then there's Tomb Raider which started out a bit meh at least on AMD but now thanks to both game patches and driver improvements it's improved by a good bit.
EDIT: I heard the benchmark was a bit generous compared to the actual game but it's kinda funny to see with the 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 framerate results, Fury 4K framerate is more along what I experienced in the tutorial level though some areas do run a bit better though the fast VRAM consumption likely plays a part of this as well with how quickly it surpasses the 4 GB limit. (And some occasional areas partway through the level run worse, heh.)
Albeit based on the same game rendering engine that was used in the previous edition the game actually looks good at both HIGH and Ultra quality settings, especially Ultra has very nice sharp textures but annihilates any graphics card.
If you mean DirectX 11 then yep.
If it's the game engine that is referenced then Human Revolution allegedly used a altered Crystal engine that were mainly used for the Crystal Dynamics teams Tomb Raider franchise and now this sequel uses a new engine called Dawn although from what I just read it's core is a heavily updated Glacier engine from the previous game so eh I guess it's technically correct even if it's a fairly big overhaul in terms of features offered or how to say.
Could have done with some extra time for the PC version, yeah a delayed release would have been annoying too but I'd prefer a better optimized and bug-tested final product personally but eh that's up to the publisher to control mainly.
Nixxes is usually very supportive though as seen with multiple updates for the original Human Revolution - though the updated version is a bit so-so but handled by Eidos directly from my understanding. - and then there's Tomb Raider which started out a bit meh at least on AMD but now thanks to both game patches and driver improvements it's improved by a good bit.
EDIT: I heard the benchmark was a bit generous compared to the actual game but it's kinda funny to see with the 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 framerate results, Fury 4K framerate is more along what I experienced in the tutorial level though some areas do run a bit better though the fast VRAM consumption likely plays a part of this as well with how quickly it surpasses the 4 GB limit. (And some occasional areas partway through the level run worse, heh.)
bemaniac
Senior Member
Posts: 266
Joined: 2009-03-17
Senior Member
Posts: 266
Joined: 2009-03-17
#5325734 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:45 PM
Think about metro
This looks like the demo level from the start of metro. This has a load more detail though. Like a lot lot more detail so I'm thinking this is going to need some great SLI/Crossfire support if it is to sell well. Metro would have sold more units initially if the right hardware for it was available at launch. I run UHD (my local currys doesnt seem to have 1080p sets anymore) so for my SLI 980tis (still £700 worth of gear new) I won't be purchasing as I wont be getting over 40fps.
Think about metro
This looks like the demo level from the start of metro. This has a load more detail though. Like a lot lot more detail so I'm thinking this is going to need some great SLI/Crossfire support if it is to sell well. Metro would have sold more units initially if the right hardware for it was available at launch. I run UHD (my local currys doesnt seem to have 1080p sets anymore) so for my SLI 980tis (still £700 worth of gear new) I won't be purchasing as I wont be getting over 40fps.
nitroxyl
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: 2011-01-26
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: 2011-01-26
#5325742 Posted on: 08/24/2016 04:57 PM
Would've been nice to see how gtx 970 and 980 can run the game
Would've been nice to see how gtx 970 and 980 can run the game
KingK76
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: 2009-12-14
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: 2009-12-14
#5325745 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:01 PM
Honestly this game isn't bad at a locked 30fps. For me i play the stealth route so i prefer 4K@30fps over 1440p@60fps (i have a water cooled Pascal Titan X) because playing on a 70" 4K UHDTV really makes the higher resolution (4K over 1440p) noticeable. With my OC i can run the game vysynced at 60Hz and run around 40-50fps... but locking it to 30fps really isn't that bad. Would i rather play at 60fps? Of course. But i will take a hit to framerate (in this game... not all) for the extra visual IQ in this case.
Honestly this game isn't bad at a locked 30fps. For me i play the stealth route so i prefer 4K@30fps over 1440p@60fps (i have a water cooled Pascal Titan X) because playing on a 70" 4K UHDTV really makes the higher resolution (4K over 1440p) noticeable. With my OC i can run the game vysynced at 60Hz and run around 40-50fps... but locking it to 30fps really isn't that bad. Would i rather play at 60fps? Of course. But i will take a hit to framerate (in this game... not all) for the extra visual IQ in this case.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1744
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1744
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5325747 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:05 PM
Pascal Titan X is a monster of a card. 1080 looked so powerful, but now it's on all fours in front of Titan X.
Pascal Titan X is a monster of a card. 1080 looked so powerful, but now it's on all fours in front of Titan X.
trentbg
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2009-11-05
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 2009-11-05
#5325750 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:11 PM
My thoughts exactly!
Would've been nice to see how gtx 970 and 980 can run the game
My thoughts exactly!
Mannerheim
Member
Posts: 4790
Joined: 2004-01-24
Member
Posts: 4790
Joined: 2004-01-24
#5325762 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:40 PM
Somewhat "higher texel fill rate, higher fps?"
titan x 1 422
1080 2 257
fury X 3 268
1070 4 241
Fury 5 268
Nano 6 256
980ti 7 176
390x 8 184
480 9 182
390 10 160
470 11 154
1060 12 128
380x 13 137
780ti 14 205 "lost driver support"
Somewhat "higher texel fill rate, higher fps?"
titan x 1 422
1080 2 257
fury X 3 268
1070 4 241
Fury 5 268
Nano 6 256
980ti 7 176
390x 8 184
480 9 182
390 10 160
470 11 154
1060 12 128
380x 13 137
780ti 14 205 "lost driver support"
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5259
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5259
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5325763 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:47 PM
It's getting panned on steam. A lot of people waiting for patches to see if there's any performance improvements...before getting a refund.
It's getting panned on steam. A lot of people waiting for patches to see if there's any performance improvements...before getting a refund.
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1240
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1240
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5325766 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:54 PM
Thanks!
I have it installed but am waiting on better SLI performance. I should be able to max the game at 1080P.
Thanks!
I have it installed but am waiting on better SLI performance. I should be able to max the game at 1080P.
Carfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2659
Joined: 2010-05-06
Senior Member
Posts: 2659
Joined: 2010-05-06
#5325767 Posted on: 08/24/2016 05:56 PM
FYI, the in game benchmark is a lot different, and also tends to inflate AMD performance relative to the actual game itself. AMD seems to be doing this a lot recently with their G.E titles like Total Warhammer, where the scripted benchmark will return higher values for AMD hardware compared to the game itself.
PCGH.de tested the game using the Prague area, and there the performance was not only much better overall for both NVidia and AMD, but NVidia took the lead over AMD:
PCGH.de test results
FYI, the in game benchmark is a lot different, and also tends to inflate AMD performance relative to the actual game itself. AMD seems to be doing this a lot recently with their G.E titles like Total Warhammer, where the scripted benchmark will return higher values for AMD hardware compared to the game itself.
PCGH.de tested the game using the Prague area, and there the performance was not only much better overall for both NVidia and AMD, but NVidia took the lead over AMD:
PCGH.de test results
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11132
Joined: 2014-07-21
Thanks for the review Hilbert!