Patriot Viper Venom DDR5 6200 CL40 review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review
DDR5 Ryzen 7 7700 DDR5 memory scaling review
Seasonic Arch Q503 chassis + Connect PSU review
GeForce RTX 4080/4090 announcements (preview)
Corsair HS55 Wireless Core Headset review
TerraMaster F4-423 NAS Review
Review: Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Advanced OC
We review the Colorful iGame advanced OC model of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, a product with more a triple fan cooler as well being factory tweaked towards an 1860 MHz boost frequency. Based on three fans and improved looks we check out if this card performs well.
Read the review here.
Review: ASRock Z390 Steel Legend - 06/18/2019 02:05 PM
In this review, we peek at a more affordable Z390 motherboard from ASRock, meet the Z390 Steel Legend. Ready for 8th or 9th Gen processors this board is about performance, aesthetics and features. Rea...
Review: Corsair M55 RGB PRO gaming mouse - 06/13/2019 03:09 PM
Corsair is adding more rodents, this round we review the Corsair M55 RGB Pro Gaming mouse. It’s a mouse from a lower segment of the market than the M65 RGB Elite, which we reviewed back in J...
Review: Lexar NM600 NVMe M.2. SSD (480GB) - 06/12/2019 10:48 AM
This review covers the new Lexar NM600 series, this more affordable series 480GB model is plenty fast with a rated sequential read speed up to 2100 MB/s and sequential write speed up to 1600MB/s. R...
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 (379 USD) and 5700 XT (449 USD) - 06/11/2019 01:20 AM
AMD just has announced its Radeon 5700 series graphics cards. The NAVI, 7nm, GDDR6 memory and a new architecture called rDNA. In this early preview article, we’ll share details and about the...
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - Incl Ryzen 9 3950X (16-core) - 06/11/2019 01:20 AM
Gen 3 aka Ryzen 3000 has received new announcements. You might have watched the live-stream, well that or you were asleep as that was nighttime in the EU, but in this preview article a deeper overview...
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5682804 Posted on: 06/21/2019 08:56 AM
And curent turing rtx cards makes no sense also i am curious if they will keep this pricing on 7nm ampere.
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.
And curent turing rtx cards makes no sense also i am curious if they will keep this pricing on 7nm ampere.
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 5872
Joined: 2004-01-28
Senior Member
Posts: 5872
Joined: 2004-01-28
#5682805 Posted on: 06/21/2019 08:57 AM
What reviews are you reading?
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.
What reviews are you reading?
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5682816 Posted on: 06/21/2019 09:21 AM
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
Man you really hate the 1660Ti don't ya. Maybe because it absolutely destroys a RX580 with less ram?
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 19853
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 19853
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5682818 Posted on: 06/21/2019 09:25 AM
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
He always starts the argument how his cards beats mine which makes no sense. He payed 280$ for the lowest msi version of the 1660ti. In used market gtx1080 can be had for that price.
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
He always starts the argument how his cards beats mine which makes no sense. He payed 280$ for the lowest msi version of the 1660ti. In used market gtx1080 can be had for that price.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 19853
Joined: 2008-08-28
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.