Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.33.0.0
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4091
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.33.138
CPU-Z download v2.04
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download


New Forum Topics
AMD Confirms Strategy of Restraining Chip Supply to Maintain High CPU and GPU Prices Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL What reason to go to Windows 11? Microsoft Now Is Proactively Informing Windows 10 users to update to Windows 11 Samsung Issues new Firmware to prevent Dying 980 Pro SSDs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X sees price drop to $299 Forspoken Benchmark Test & Performance Analysis Review Netflix threatens to ban customers who share an account unauthorized AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.11.2 - Driver download and discussion CORSAIR introduces the new VENGEANCE a8100 and i8100 gaming PCs




Guru3D.com » News » Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks

Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/08/2017 01:29 PM | source: | 16 comment(s)
Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks

Mercedes, Ferrari or Red Bull? We will look at Codemasters F1 2017 in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics cards.

Read the full review here.







« G.SKILL Launches New DDR4-4600MHz Extreme PerformanceTrident Z Memory Kit · Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks · Intel cancels WiGig cards and 802.11ad docking parts »

Related Stories

Review: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 FCAT Analysis - 09/08/2017 08:56 AM
We check out frame-pacing and frametime behavior with the Radeon RX 64, but will compare it with the GeForce GTX 1080, will FCAT reveal some stuff we need to know? Read the article right here.    ...

Review: Fractal Design Meshify C Chassis - 09/07/2017 12:55 PM
ractal Design released the Meshify C, a more airflow optimized compact PC chassis. This black design chassis comes with plenty of cooling options for it's compact size. It will house house ATX mother...

Review: MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC motherboard - 09/05/2017 09:13 AM
Let's check out another Ryzen Threadripper motherboard. We review the one from MSI as they have released their X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC. The board is stylish, comes with very subtle LED effects and ...

Review: HP S700 Pro 1 TB SSD - 09/01/2017 08:56 AM
We test a new HP S700 Pro SSD series, the rather properly volume sized 1024 GB (1 TB), model which we will review. The S700 Pro series offers a compete range of good performing storage products, yet p...

Review: Gigabyte ATC700 AORUS - 08/31/2017 09:24 AM
We test and review the Gigabyte ATC700 AORUS processor cooler. The cooler is setup in a robust push-pull configuration and has three massive direct contact heatpipes as well as being RGB lighting conf...


4 pages 1 2 3 4


anxious_f0x
Senior Member



Posts: 1832
Joined: 2013-11-08

#5470363 Posted on: 09/08/2017 02:42 PM
I've been enjoying this game since launch, it's nice to see some benchmarks for a racing game, doesn't happen too often, thanks Hilbert :)

CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member



Posts: 2647
Joined: 2013-02-26

#5470364 Posted on: 09/08/2017 02:44 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 45550
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5470369 Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:08 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Meeh, not entirely. The difference in-between 480 and 580 is roughly in the 10% mark thanks to boosting and the binned XTX GPUs. Account for a bit of anomalies (no racing lap reproduces 100% similar results due to random stuff happening) so that 12~13% differential makes sense. But sure it is a little on the high side.

Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21

#5470376 Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:23 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Meeh, not entirely. The difference in-between 480 and 580 is roughly in the 10% mark thanks to boosting and the binned XTX GPUs. Account for a bit of anomalies (no racing lap reproduces 100% similar results due to random stuff happening) so that 12~13% differential makes sense. But sure it is a little on the high side.

Could it be like what happened with Hawaii with the refresh getting favorable driver improvements over the older cards at first then performance coming in line later?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 45550
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5470383 Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:42 PM
Considering both are Polaris, I highly doubt that.

4 pages 1 2 3 4


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023