Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review

New Downloads
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 WHQL driver download
GeForce 516.59 WHQL driver download
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.22 Download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download v4.06.10.651
CrystalDiskInfo 8.17 Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 Windows 7 driver download
ReShade download v5.2.2
HWiNFO Download v7.26
7-Zip v22.00 Download
GeForce 516.40 WHQL driver download


New Forum Topics
Tensor Core equivalent Likely to Get Embedded in AMD rDNA3 Kingston launches Iron Key Vault Privacy 80 hardware encrypted SSD with touch panel According to Asus and Gigabyte, motherboard sales will fall by 25% this year. [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) 3060ti vs 6700xt a year later Windows 11 Insider Builds CORSAIR Introduces the New TC200 Gaming Chairs AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 - Driver download and discussion Review: Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual nvidia HD audio driver issues




Guru3D.com » News » Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks

Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/08/2017 01:29 PM | source: | 16 comment(s)
Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks

Mercedes, Ferrari or Red Bull? We will look at Codemasters F1 2017 in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics cards.

Read the full review here.







« G.SKILL Launches New DDR4-4600MHz Extreme PerformanceTrident Z Memory Kit · Review: Codemasters F1 2017: PC graphics benchmarks · Intel cancels WiGig cards and 802.11ad docking parts »

Related Stories

Review: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 FCAT Analysis - 09/08/2017 08:56 AM
We check out frame-pacing and frametime behavior with the Radeon RX 64, but will compare it with the GeForce GTX 1080, will FCAT reveal some stuff we need to know? Read the article right here.    ...

Review: Fractal Design Meshify C Chassis - 09/07/2017 12:55 PM
ractal Design released the Meshify C, a more airflow optimized compact PC chassis. This black design chassis comes with plenty of cooling options for it's compact size. It will house house ATX mother...

Review: MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC motherboard - 09/05/2017 09:13 AM
Let's check out another Ryzen Threadripper motherboard. We review the one from MSI as they have released their X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC. The board is stylish, comes with very subtle LED effects and ...

Review: HP S700 Pro 1 TB SSD - 09/01/2017 08:56 AM
We test a new HP S700 Pro SSD series, the rather properly volume sized 1024 GB (1 TB), model which we will review. The S700 Pro series offers a compete range of good performing storage products, yet p...

Review: Gigabyte ATC700 AORUS - 08/31/2017 09:24 AM
We test and review the Gigabyte ATC700 AORUS processor cooler. The cooler is setup in a robust push-pull configuration and has three massive direct contact heatpipes as well as being RGB lighting conf...


4 pages 1 2 3 4


anxious_f0x
Senior Member



Posts: 1757
Joined: 2013-11-08

#5470363 Posted on: 09/08/2017 02:42 PM
I've been enjoying this game since launch, it's nice to see some benchmarks for a racing game, doesn't happen too often, thanks Hilbert :)

CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member



Posts: 2555
Joined: 2013-02-26

#5470364 Posted on: 09/08/2017 02:44 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 44066
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5470369 Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:08 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Meeh, not entirely. The difference in-between 480 and 580 is roughly in the 10% mark thanks to boosting and the binned XTX GPUs. Account for a bit of anomalies (no racing lap reproduces 100% similar results due to random stuff happening) so that 12~13% differential makes sense. But sure it is a little on the high side.

Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9800
Joined: 2011-09-21

#5470376 Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:23 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Meeh, not entirely. The difference in-between 480 and 580 is roughly in the 10% mark thanks to boosting and the binned XTX GPUs. Account for a bit of anomalies (no racing lap reproduces 100% similar results due to random stuff happening) so that 12~13% differential makes sense. But sure it is a little on the high side.

Could it be like what happened with Hawaii with the refresh getting favorable driver improvements over the older cards at first then performance coming in line later?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 44066
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5470383 Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:42 PM
Considering both are Polaris, I highly doubt that.

4 pages 1 2 3 4


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022