MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT GamingX 8GB review
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT EVO 8GB review
PowerColor Radeon RX 5500 XT Red Dragon 8GB review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 8GB review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB review
Zotac Gaming GTX 1650 Super review
Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview
Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Review: COD Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark
We take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view and comes with HBAO+ and Super Sampling as well.
Read the article right here.
Review: DeepCool Maelstrom 240 - 11/04/2014 08:55 AM
We review the review the DeepCool Maelstrom 240, an All-in-One Liquid cooling kit with a 240mm radiator. These liquid cooling kits are pre-fitted with a single loop and ready to install straight out o...
Review: GALAX GeForce GTX 980 SOC - 10/30/2014 08:14 AM
Join us as we review test and benchmark the GALAX GeForce GTX SOC (Gamer) edition. SOC is short for Super Overclocked, and that certainly is the case. The card has 4 GB graphics memory, is energy effi...
Review: SanDisk Ultra II 240 GB SSD - 10/28/2014 08:31 AM
We review and benchmark the SanDisk Ultra II series SSD which we'll benchmark and review. Performance wise these SSDs will be fast, reads really good, writes due to Toggle NAND flash a little slower....
Review: BitFenix Pandora Micro ATX Case - 10/23/2014 08:49 AM
We check out the BitFenix Pandoras Box. We review this Mini ITX / Micro ATX chassis, which is launched as a small affordable chassis solution that fits big graphics cards, but houses the smallest Micr...
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream - 10/22/2014 08:41 AM
Today we review the Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream edition, one of the fastest GTX 980'ies on the globe. It does that while staying very silent. Heck, the cooler won't even spin with GPU temp...
Anth Seebel
Senior Member
Posts: 281
Joined: 2009-01-23
Senior Member
Posts: 281
Joined: 2009-01-23
#4951670 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:20 PM
Thanks hilly !
Today (Tuesday the 4th 2014) you can expect the new 344.60 driver released from NVIDIA
Thanks hilly !
Sukovsky
Senior Member
Posts: 915
Joined: 2005-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 915
Joined: 2005-08-22
#4951671 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:24 PM
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Joined: 2000-02-22
#4951672 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:25 PM
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
moab600
Senior Member
Posts: 6115
Joined: 2004-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 6115
Joined: 2004-09-30
#4951675 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:36 PM
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
Yep thank you Hilbert, i've played that and tbh i had stuttering regradless of settings in one stage while in other was perfect, stupid engine just need more modification.
All games that come out must be directly compared to BF4, it looks very good performs very good and yet requires powerful system for FHD with MSAA.
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
Yep thank you Hilbert, i've played that and tbh i had stuttering regradless of settings in one stage while in other was perfect, stupid engine just need more modification.
All games that come out must be directly compared to BF4, it looks very good performs very good and yet requires powerful system for FHD with MSAA.
Bradders684
Senior Member
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2010-01-13
Senior Member
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2010-01-13
#4951676 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:37 PM
The title of some of the graphs need correcting Hilbert, they say MSAA instead of SMAA.
Nice review though.
The title of some of the graphs need correcting Hilbert, they say MSAA instead of SMAA.
Nice review though.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Joined: 2000-02-22
#4951677 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:39 PM
The title of some of the graphs need correcting Hilbert, they say MSAA instead of SMAA.
Nice review though.
Aaahw crap ... back to the charts.
The title of some of the graphs need correcting Hilbert, they say MSAA instead of SMAA.
Nice review though.
Aaahw crap ... back to the charts.
Emille
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
#4951680 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:45 PM
What settings are reflected in the VRAM usage graphs?
Max settings, 2 SMAA?
What settings are reflected in the VRAM usage graphs?
Max settings, 2 SMAA?
dbogss
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 2013-05-20
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 2013-05-20
#4951694 Posted on: 11/04/2014 01:13 PM
Thank you for the review Hilbert...Cod is actually a nice surprise this year
Thank you for the review Hilbert...Cod is actually a nice surprise this year
scatman839
Senior Member
Posts: 13985
Joined: 2004-11-19
Senior Member
Posts: 13985
Joined: 2004-11-19
#4951696 Posted on: 11/04/2014 01:16 PM
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
At least you found a solution to the incredibly long loads, would have been mind numbing with that
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
At least you found a solution to the incredibly long loads, would have been mind numbing with that
Deckard
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2009-07-02
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2009-07-02
#4951744 Posted on: 11/04/2014 02:23 PM
Hi Hilbert,
What monitor did you use? 32" 3820 x2160 ? im in the market for one
cheers
good review
Hi Hilbert,
What monitor did you use? 32" 3820 x2160 ? im in the market for one
cheers
good review
Bradders684
Senior Member
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2010-01-13
Senior Member
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2010-01-13
#4951757 Posted on: 11/04/2014 02:38 PM
Hi Hilbert,
What monitor did you use? 32" 3820 x2160 ? im in the market for one
cheers
good review
He uses a ASUS PQ321 for 4k benches, you can see his review of it here.
Hi Hilbert,
What monitor did you use? 32" 3820 x2160 ? im in the market for one
cheers
good review
He uses a ASUS PQ321 for 4k benches, you can see his review of it here.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 2213
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 2213
Joined: 2007-05-31
#4951759 Posted on: 11/04/2014 02:40 PM
interesting on high end GPU but also on lower GPU...
NVidia 760ti and AMD 260X do their job quite well i think, they impress me a lot for their cost.
interesting on high end GPU but also on lower GPU...
NVidia 760ti and AMD 260X do their job quite well i think, they impress me a lot for their cost.
Deckard
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2009-07-02
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2009-07-02
#4951779 Posted on: 11/04/2014 02:58 PM
Thank you
He uses a ASUS PQ321 for 4k benches, you can see his review of it here.
Thank you
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Joined: 2000-02-22
#4951785 Posted on: 11/04/2014 03:00 PM
Correct yes, the ASUS PQ321.
Correct yes, the ASUS PQ321.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6115
Joined: 2004-09-30
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?