ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) Guide by 1USMUS
HP S750 SSD 1TB review
Corsair CX750F RGB (750W PSU) review
GeForce RTX 3090 Founder review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X TRIO review
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPRO OC review
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD review
GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO review
Review: COD Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark
We take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view and comes with HBAO+ and Super Sampling as well.
Read the article right here.
Review: DeepCool Maelstrom 240 - 11/04/2014 09:55 AM
We review the review the DeepCool Maelstrom 240, an All-in-One Liquid cooling kit with a 240mm radiator. These liquid cooling kits are pre-fitted with a single loop and ready to install straight out o...
Review: GALAX GeForce GTX 980 SOC - 10/30/2014 09:14 AM
Join us as we review test and benchmark the GALAX GeForce GTX SOC (Gamer) edition. SOC is short for Super Overclocked, and that certainly is the case. The card has 4 GB graphics memory, is energy effi...
Review: SanDisk Ultra II 240 GB SSD - 10/28/2014 09:31 AM
We review and benchmark the SanDisk Ultra II series SSD which we'll benchmark and review. Performance wise these SSDs will be fast, reads really good, writes due to Toggle NAND flash a little slower....
Review: BitFenix Pandora Micro ATX Case - 10/23/2014 09:49 AM
We check out the BitFenix Pandoras Box. We review this Mini ITX / Micro ATX chassis, which is launched as a small affordable chassis solution that fits big graphics cards, but houses the smallest Micr...
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream - 10/22/2014 09:41 AM
Today we review the Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream edition, one of the fastest GTX 980'ies on the globe. It does that while staying very silent. Heck, the cooler won't even spin with GPU temp...
Anth Seebel
Senior Member
Posts: 281
Joined: 2009-01-23
Senior Member
Posts: 281
Joined: 2009-01-23
#4951670 Posted on: 11/04/2014 01:20 PM
Thanks hilly !
Today (Tuesday the 4th 2014) you can expect the new 344.60 driver released from NVIDIA
Thanks hilly !
Sukovsky
Senior Member
Posts: 925
Joined: 2005-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 925
Joined: 2005-08-22
#4951671 Posted on: 11/04/2014 01:24 PM
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38988
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38988
Joined: 2000-02-22
#4951672 Posted on: 11/04/2014 01:25 PM
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
moab600
Senior Member
Posts: 6217
Joined: 2004-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 6217
Joined: 2004-09-30
#4951675 Posted on: 11/04/2014 01:36 PM
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
Yep thank you Hilbert, i've played that and tbh i had stuttering regradless of settings in one stage while in other was perfect, stupid engine just need more modification.
All games that come out must be directly compared to BF4, it looks very good performs very good and yet requires powerful system for FHD with MSAA.
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
Yep thank you Hilbert, i've played that and tbh i had stuttering regradless of settings in one stage while in other was perfect, stupid engine just need more modification.
All games that come out must be directly compared to BF4, it looks very good performs very good and yet requires powerful system for FHD with MSAA.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6217
Joined: 2004-09-30
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?