Palit GeForce GTX 1650 KalmX review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2020
Deepcool Gamer Storm Macube 310P review
NVIDIA Shield Android TV 2019 review
Fractal Design ERA ITX chassis review
Gigabyte TRX40 Aorus Master review
XFX Radeon RX 5600 XT THICC 2 review
Cougar Blazer review
NZXT Kraken X63 Review
Team Group T-Force XTREEM ARGB DDR4 review
Review: COD Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark
We take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view and comes with HBAO+ and Super Sampling as well.
Read the article right here.
Review: DeepCool Maelstrom 240 - 11/04/2014 08:55 AM
We review the review the DeepCool Maelstrom 240, an All-in-One Liquid cooling kit with a 240mm radiator. These liquid cooling kits are pre-fitted with a single loop and ready to install straight out o...
Review: GALAX GeForce GTX 980 SOC - 10/30/2014 08:14 AM
Join us as we review test and benchmark the GALAX GeForce GTX SOC (Gamer) edition. SOC is short for Super Overclocked, and that certainly is the case. The card has 4 GB graphics memory, is energy effi...
Review: SanDisk Ultra II 240 GB SSD - 10/28/2014 08:31 AM
We review and benchmark the SanDisk Ultra II series SSD which we'll benchmark and review. Performance wise these SSDs will be fast, reads really good, writes due to Toggle NAND flash a little slower....
Review: BitFenix Pandora Micro ATX Case - 10/23/2014 08:49 AM
We check out the BitFenix Pandoras Box. We review this Mini ITX / Micro ATX chassis, which is launched as a small affordable chassis solution that fits big graphics cards, but houses the smallest Micr...
Review: Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream - 10/22/2014 08:41 AM
Today we review the Palit GeForce GTX 980 Super Jetstream edition, one of the fastest GTX 980'ies on the globe. It does that while staying very silent. Heck, the cooler won't even spin with GPU temp...
Anth Seebel
Senior Member
Posts: 281
Joined: 2009-01-23
Senior Member
Posts: 281
Joined: 2009-01-23
#4951670 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:20 PM
Thanks hilly !
Today (Tuesday the 4th 2014) you can expect the new 344.60 driver released from NVIDIA
Thanks hilly !
Sukovsky
Senior Member
Posts: 915
Joined: 2005-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 915
Joined: 2005-08-22
#4951671 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:24 PM
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Wow, looks like the next generation of cards will really need 12GB+ ram.. Looks like the GT 930 with 16GB ram for 400 bucks will be really worth it!
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 37295
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 37295
Joined: 2000-02-22
#4951672 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:25 PM
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
moab600
Senior Member
Posts: 6155
Joined: 2004-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 6155
Joined: 2004-09-30
#4951675 Posted on: 11/04/2014 12:36 PM
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
Yep thank you Hilbert, i've played that and tbh i had stuttering regradless of settings in one stage while in other was perfect, stupid engine just need more modification.
All games that come out must be directly compared to BF4, it looks very good performs very good and yet requires powerful system for FHD with MSAA.
If you read the article it is explained, COD is not a reliable enough title to benchmark precisely. One scene will show different results from another. Do the same sequence 3 times and each run the FPS will be a notch different. That can result into weird stuff. As such and as stated in the article, the results are indicative at best.
I will not be adding COD AW to our benchmark suite because of this.
Yep thank you Hilbert, i've played that and tbh i had stuttering regradless of settings in one stage while in other was perfect, stupid engine just need more modification.
All games that come out must be directly compared to BF4, it looks very good performs very good and yet requires powerful system for FHD with MSAA.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6155
Joined: 2004-09-30
hmm some weird performance, on the russian site nvidia 780 is better than 290X, here titan black wins over ti by 12 fps? hmm.
Is it the new drivers of nvidia that mess up?