Zotac Gaming GTX 1650 Super review
Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview
Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
Review: Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark performance
Launching today, we tested 23 graphics cards with Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for Windows PC in our typical graphics benchmark review. We'll take the game all the way from 1080P towards even 5K Ultra HD at a 5120x2880 pixels resolution. The game is easy to render even at the most stringent image quality settings. Have a peek at the latest iteration of the Call of Duty series.
Rad the full article right here.
Review: Fractal Design Define C chassis - 11/02/2016 03:00 PM
Today Fractal Design released the Define C, a silent, stylish and compact PC chassis. Armed with a PSU compartment this product is made with airflow and liquid cooling in mind to serve the more perfor...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Quick Silver 8G OC edition - 11/01/2016 05:43 PM
MSI today releases a new GeForce GTX 1070, the Quick Silver OC edition sits in the Gaming series of products. Basically this GeForce GTX 1070 is a Gaming X model in a different jacket. This GTX 1070 h...
Review: MSI Core Frozr L processor cooler - 11/01/2016 08:26 AM
We test and review the MSI Core Frozr L processor cooler. MSI is placing the cooler in the market, likely made with the same designers and fab that manufacturers their TwiNFrozr GPU cooler. The end re...
Review: Zalman ZM-K900M RGB mechanical keyboard with Kailh switches - 10/27/2016 08:17 AM
We review the ZM-K900M, the new RGB LED lit mechanical keyboard from Zalman. This Kailh switches based mechanical keyboard with nice pressure keys comes an RGB LED animation system. Overall a simple a...
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1050 & 1050 Ti Gaming X - 10/25/2016 02:00 PM
Last week Nvidia announced the GeForce GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti, today the performance benchmark embargo is lifted. We test the MSI Gaming X editions, two graphics cards aimed at the budget minded consume...
EdInk
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 2016-03-30
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 2016-03-30
#5354620 Posted on: 11/04/2016 11:57 AM
Thanks HH for this swift benchmark.
Most impressive card for me in this line up at 1080p would be the RX470. What a performance!
Thanks HH for this swift benchmark.
Most impressive card for me in this line up at 1080p would be the RX470. What a performance!
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 941
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 941
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5354633 Posted on: 11/04/2016 12:43 PM
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
realmadrid
Senior Member
Posts: 177
Joined: 2015-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 177
Joined: 2015-04-30
#5354635 Posted on: 11/04/2016 12:52 PM
the gimping is so real
the gimping is so real
saucerer
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2015-11-30
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2015-11-30
#5354640 Posted on: 11/04/2016 01:09 PM
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36497
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36497
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5354642 Posted on: 11/04/2016 01:12 PM
The MSI 970 Gaming.
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
The MSI 970 Gaming.
mattm4
Senior Member
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-01-08
Senior Member
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-01-08
#5354645 Posted on: 11/04/2016 01:17 PM
That RX480 is kicking @$$ and taking names!!
But on a side note... I feel its really time for COD to make a new engine, and revamp the whole game, instead of a few new features and a little polish on the graphics. I would consider buying one of their games then. But I guess..... if they keep getting good sales at a priemium price, why revamp it? lol
That RX480 is kicking @$$ and taking names!!
But on a side note... I feel its really time for COD to make a new engine, and revamp the whole game, instead of a few new features and a little polish on the graphics. I would consider buying one of their games then. But I guess..... if they keep getting good sales at a priemium price, why revamp it? lol
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5354650 Posted on: 11/04/2016 01:25 PM
Yeah, very nice performance from RX480. Outperforming 980 and 390X and even a Fury Pro.
Yeah, very nice performance from RX480. Outperforming 980 and 390X and even a Fury Pro.
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 634
Joined: 2011-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 634
Joined: 2011-01-11
#5354659 Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:00 PM
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
CronoGraal
Senior Member
Posts: 4162
Joined: 2006-10-11
Senior Member
Posts: 4162
Joined: 2006-10-11
#5354660 Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:02 PM
they shafted you when they sold you a 3.5gb card
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
they shafted you when they sold you a 3.5gb card
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9418
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9418
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5354661 Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:02 PM
Probably has something to do with the memory configuration. Nvidia may optimize it in a later driver (or not).
After looking closer may not be any issue. It's just a tad faster than the 780ti and about 20% slower than the 980. Seems about where it should be. This title is on a older engine that Kepler still has some optimization for so it may be you guys are seeing that.
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
Probably has something to do with the memory configuration. Nvidia may optimize it in a later driver (or not).
After looking closer may not be any issue. It's just a tad faster than the 780ti and about 20% slower than the 980. Seems about where it should be. This title is on a older engine that Kepler still has some optimization for so it may be you guys are seeing that.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5354662 Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:03 PM
Low end card? Fury X is a third best performing card this review. You really have no idea what your talking about.
They real sad part is that you cannot use your 4xTitan cards in any game.
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Low end card? Fury X is a third best performing card this review. You really have no idea what your talking about.
They real sad part is that you cannot use your 4xTitan cards in any game.
mattm4
Senior Member
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-01-08
Senior Member
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-01-08
#5354673 Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:26 PM
Deskstar, either you're one of those fanboys or a troll out against AMD. Most of your posts I've seen have been attacks on AMD for dumb reasons. Some of which come across that you really don't know what you're talking about half the time.
But... I cant take anyone seriously when they have 4x Titans, and run a 120hz monitor.. cause that's plain stupid lol.
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Deskstar, either you're one of those fanboys or a troll out against AMD. Most of your posts I've seen have been attacks on AMD for dumb reasons. Some of which come across that you really don't know what you're talking about half the time.
But... I cant take anyone seriously when they have 4x Titans, and run a 120hz monitor.. cause that's plain stupid lol.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36497
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36497
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5354694 Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:11 PM
Guys, how about not fighting and insulting for a change?, it would make a heck of a paradox towards the game right
Guys, how about not fighting and insulting for a change?, it would make a heck of a paradox towards the game right
Singleton99
Senior Member
Posts: 1014
Joined: 2012-04-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1014
Joined: 2012-04-18
#5354696 Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:13 PM
Are you looking at different benchmarks to everyone else @ 1440p the fury-x is 2fps behind a 980ti which is pretty much equal , i class this as a excellent show for AMD and just confirms how well a 4gb card is still performing in the latest games today
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Are you looking at different benchmarks to everyone else @ 1440p the fury-x is 2fps behind a 980ti which is pretty much equal , i class this as a excellent show for AMD and just confirms how well a 4gb card is still performing in the latest games today
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2008-08-28
Thanks for another game benchmark, HH. Next stop Dishonored 2
Overall decent performance from both sides. I wonder how MW remaster compare to this IW.