Review: Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark performance

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/04/2016 05:30 PM | source: | 53 comment(s)

Launching today, we tested 23 graphics cards with Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for Windows PC in our typical graphics benchmark review. We'll take the game all the way from 1080P towards even 5K Ultra HD at a 5120x2880 pixels resolution. The game is easy to render even at the most stringent image quality settings. Have a peek at the latest iteration of the Call of Duty series.

Rad the full article right here.

Related Stories

Review: Fractal Design Define C chassis - 11/02/2016 04:00 PM
Today Fractal Design released the Define C, a silent, stylish and compact PC chassis. Armed with a PSU compartment this product is made with airflow and liquid cooling in mind to serve the more perfor...

Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Quick Silver 8G OC edition - 11/01/2016 06:43 PM
MSI today releases a new GeForce GTX 1070, the Quick Silver OC edition sits in the Gaming series of products. Basically this GeForce GTX 1070 is a Gaming X model in a different jacket. This GTX 1070 h...

Review: MSI Core Frozr L processor cooler - 11/01/2016 09:26 AM
We test and review the MSI Core Frozr L processor cooler. MSI is placing the cooler in the market, likely made with the same designers and fab that manufacturers their TwiNFrozr GPU cooler. The end re...

Review: Zalman ZM-K900M RGB mechanical keyboard with Kailh switches - 10/27/2016 09:17 AM
We review the ZM-K900M, the new RGB LED lit mechanical keyboard from Zalman. This Kailh switches based mechanical keyboard with nice pressure keys comes an RGB LED animation system. Overall a simple a...

Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1050 & 1050 Ti Gaming X - 10/25/2016 03:00 PM
Last week Nvidia announced the GeForce GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti, today the performance benchmark embargo is lifted. We test the MSI Gaming X editions, two graphics cards aimed at the budget minded consume...

11 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

Turanis
Senior Member

Posts: 1780
Joined: 2014-08-15

#5354699 Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:20 PM

I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.

Errmm...HBM is not GDDR5/X!

HBM releases textures & stuff from memory with more Speed than Gddr5/x.
So better get informed than spread non-sense.
When you get Gtx with HBM then you can talk real,until then stay low.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGLQWlXo0Q&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s

kinggavin
Senior Member

Posts: 297
Joined: 2014-11-06

#5354701 Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:23 PM

read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan £1000 card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti

Koniakki
Senior Member

Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15

#5354708 Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:31 PM

read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti

I would say more close to a GTX 970 and it's called progress.

huilun02
Senior Member

Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29

#5354712 Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:35 PM

So BF1 looks way better with far larger maps, higher player count, better assets, and yet uses less VRAM and manages to run better on the same equipment.
Bravo, Activision.

PrMinisterGR
Senior Member

Posts: 7975
Joined: 2014-09-27

#5354718 Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:49 PM

How is the 380x the same as a 970. WTF happened.

11 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.