GPU Compute render perf review with 20 GPUs
Corsair H115i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
XFX Radeon RX 5600 XT THICC 3 review
Fractal Design Define 7 XL review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - January 2020
Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GamingPro review
Team Group T-Force DarkZα 3600 MHz DDR4 review
Corsair Scimitar Elite RGB gaming mouse review
Cougar 700K Evo keyboard review
Aorus Liquid Cooler 360 review
Review: Battlefield V: PC graphics performance benchmarks analysis
It is time to review the graphics performance of what probably is the biggest selling AAA status PC game title of 2018, yes Battlefield We've started investigating how well the game runs and plays on many configurations.
You can read the article right here. (GeForce RTX Raytracing results added).
Review: Apacer Panther Rage DDR4 RGB (2x8 GB) 3200 MHz DDR4 - 11/08/2018 11:48 AM
Today we are reviewing Apacer Panther Rage DDR4 RGB memory. This is a successor to the Panther Rage Illumination and the Panther Rage. The first thing that you’ll notice is the claw-shaped d...
Review: ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming - 11/06/2018 11:06 AM
In this review, we look at the ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming. We will pair it with the new eight cores, sixteen threads proc, that Core i9 9900K. A motherboard that has very decent looks and carries so...
Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G - 11/02/2018 01:26 PM
We review what we feel might be one of the most special GeForce RTX 2070 graphics cards of them all, the Gaming Z edition from MSI. It cools great, it is just incredibly silent and most of all, it w...
Review: Corsair H115i Platinum 280mm liquid cooler - 11/01/2018 02:06 PM
We review a new premium cooler from Corsair, the Corsair Hydro Series H115i Platinum. The Platinum edition is a dual-fan 280mm model of the AIO Liquid cooler series that Corsair releases. Corsair has...
Review: Cooler Master MasterCase SL600M - 10/31/2018 01:47 PM
Cooler Master enters a new era with a very stylishly new chassis, the MasterCase SL600M is more of a design PC chassis with lots of aluminum elements that oozes features and style. However, it also ha...
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 37066
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 37066
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5605231 Posted on: 11/09/2018 06:11 PM
Alright, 16 cards in. I am completely out of DRM slots, I'll continue tomorrow when they open up.
Alright, 16 cards in. I am completely out of DRM slots, I'll continue tomorrow when they open up.
kings
Senior Member
Posts: 130
Joined: 2018-09-18
Senior Member
Posts: 130
Joined: 2018-09-18
#5605233 Posted on: 11/09/2018 06:14 PM
Results are a bit strange, on other sites the RTX cards have almost more 20fps in 1080p and 1440p, on same Ultra preset.
Results are a bit strange, on other sites the RTX cards have almost more 20fps in 1080p and 1440p, on same Ultra preset.
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2907
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2907
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5605236 Posted on: 11/09/2018 06:17 PM
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Kudos to your steel nerves and couping with EA DRM.
2080Ti performance is quite disappointing by the looks of it.
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Kudos to your steel nerves and couping with EA DRM.
2080Ti performance is quite disappointing by the looks of it.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 37066
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 37066
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5605248 Posted on: 11/09/2018 06:35 PM
Depends very much on where you measure, I tend to think I have chosen a dense and more difficult to render scene. And secondly, at 1080P with GeForce RTX, CPU limitation comes into play. I run an 8-core proc at 4200 MHz all cores. The newer 9900K for example definitely will make a bigger difference in the CPU bound resolutions e.g. 1920x1080p and maybe even a bit in 1440p.
Once all cards have been tested and DRM is cleared I'll see if I can so some perf testing with different procs, including 9900K.
Results are a bit strange, on other sites the RTX cards have almost more 20fps in 1080p and 1440p, on same Ultra preset.
Depends very much on where you measure, I tend to think I have chosen a dense and more difficult to render scene. And secondly, at 1080P with GeForce RTX, CPU limitation comes into play. I run an 8-core proc at 4200 MHz all cores. The newer 9900K for example definitely will make a bigger difference in the CPU bound resolutions e.g. 1920x1080p and maybe even a bit in 1440p.
Once all cards have been tested and DRM is cleared I'll see if I can so some perf testing with different procs, including 9900K.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4716
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4716
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5605249 Posted on: 11/09/2018 06:36 PM
This review is incomplete - there's no benchmark for Degree of Butthurt, Historical Accuracy Index, or SJW Approval Ratings. I need to know how much I'm supposed to hate this game :p.
That's probably because they expect the reviewers to get fed up and just buy more licenses.
This review is incomplete - there's no benchmark for Degree of Butthurt, Historical Accuracy Index, or SJW Approval Ratings. I need to know how much I'm supposed to hate this game :p.
It's interesting how EA manages to make reviewers job unnecessarily difficult by having this hardware change restriction in all their games.
That's probably because they expect the reviewers to get fed up and just buy more licenses.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5605251 Posted on: 11/09/2018 06:39 PM
Vega 64 on par with the RTX 2070 in 1440P and beating it on FHD, LOL! Nicely done.
Vega 64 on par with the RTX 2070 in 1440P and beating it on FHD, LOL! Nicely done.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1439
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1439
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5605276 Posted on: 11/09/2018 07:22 PM
Very impressive AMD Vega performance in comparison to NVidia, but disappointed with the fairly low fps at only 1080p resolution on high end cards. But, I am interested to see the inclusion of different CPUs within this article (which Hilbert has promised somewhere above) - perhaps the likes of 9900K/8700K/(hell maybe even 7700K) can push a stable 144 fps at 1080p for those high refresh rate screens. I'm hoping my 6700K at 4.65Ghz will be able to push a pretty stable 144fps, looking to this review to see how likely that's gonna be! (Would be interested to see performance of sensibly overclocked CPUs in this review too).
Very impressive AMD Vega performance in comparison to NVidia, but disappointed with the fairly low fps at only 1080p resolution on high end cards. But, I am interested to see the inclusion of different CPUs within this article (which Hilbert has promised somewhere above) - perhaps the likes of 9900K/8700K/(hell maybe even 7700K) can push a stable 144 fps at 1080p for those high refresh rate screens. I'm hoping my 6700K at 4.65Ghz will be able to push a pretty stable 144fps, looking to this review to see how likely that's gonna be! (Would be interested to see performance of sensibly overclocked CPUs in this review too).
Quicks
Senior Member
Posts: 548
Joined: 2006-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 548
Joined: 2006-05-22
#5605291 Posted on: 11/09/2018 07:36 PM
Why test the 470 8GB and 570 8GB if its basicly the same card, why not a 4GB of one of the two?
Why test the 470 8GB and 570 8GB if its basicly the same card, why not a 4GB of one of the two?
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
#5605322 Posted on: 11/09/2018 08:22 PM
Respects to HH. I hope we all members and others understand the extra unnecessary difficulties/expenses HH is going though just to provide this as early as possible.
We all appreciated it!
P.S: And it's good to see the 1080Ti(stock FE) doing 60fps@4K! Nice!
Respects to HH. I hope we all members and others understand the extra unnecessary difficulties/expenses HH is going though just to provide this as early as possible.
We all appreciated it!
P.S: And it's good to see the 1080Ti(stock FE) doing 60fps@4K! Nice!
Srsbsns
Senior Member
Posts: 152
Joined: 2015-01-28
Senior Member
Posts: 152
Joined: 2015-01-28
#5605338 Posted on: 11/09/2018 08:54 PM
Is this a case of AMD fine wine or is Nvidia gimping the 1080? I'm no GPU scientist but I thought there was not too much difference between the 1080 and 2080.
Is this a case of AMD fine wine or is Nvidia gimping the 1080? I'm no GPU scientist but I thought there was not too much difference between the 1080 and 2080.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4716
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4716
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5605340 Posted on: 11/09/2018 08:57 PM
To my recollection, the 2080 has similar performance to the 1080Ti, which these benchmarks are consistent with. So, I wouldn't say Nvidia is gimping anything.
And, I'd say this is also a case of AMD GPUs aging well (that, and they seem to team up with EA for optimizations pretty often).
Is this a case of AMD fine wine or is Nvidia gimping the 1080? I'm no GPU scientist but I thought there was not too much difference between the 1080 and 2080.
To my recollection, the 2080 has similar performance to the 1080Ti, which these benchmarks are consistent with. So, I wouldn't say Nvidia is gimping anything.
And, I'd say this is also a case of AMD GPUs aging well (that, and they seem to team up with EA for optimizations pretty often).
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5605347 Posted on: 11/09/2018 09:10 PM
I'm fairly sure they don't even want these kinds of reviews in the first place. The only kind of reviews they want are the type that only praise the game with no criticism. Performance reviews are unwanted because they fear someone with a more lower mainstream card would hesitate to buy the game when they see how the better cards are so far above theirs. No matter how it's clearly said in the graph that Ultra quality setting has been used, and thus more performance would be gained by lowering the setting. No doubt EA also doesn't want to read how the top card owners are baffled by "poor" results.
It's interesting how EA manages to make reviewers job unnecessarily difficult by having this hardware change restriction in all their games. They're great at pushing the break instead of gas for some reason. I imagine it wouldn't be impossible for them to disable the restriction on reviewer keys.
That's probably because they expect the reviewers to get fed up and just buy more licenses.
I'm fairly sure they don't even want these kinds of reviews in the first place. The only kind of reviews they want are the type that only praise the game with no criticism. Performance reviews are unwanted because they fear someone with a more lower mainstream card would hesitate to buy the game when they see how the better cards are so far above theirs. No matter how it's clearly said in the graph that Ultra quality setting has been used, and thus more performance would be gained by lowering the setting. No doubt EA also doesn't want to read how the top card owners are baffled by "poor" results.
Dimitrios1983
Senior Member
Posts: 243
Joined: 2018-03-01
Senior Member
Posts: 243
Joined: 2018-03-01
#5605371 Posted on: 11/09/2018 10:09 PM
Thanks for the review and your time on this Hilbert.
Thanks for the review and your time on this Hilbert.
zimzoid
Senior Member
Posts: 1435
Joined: 2004-09-06
Senior Member
Posts: 1435
Joined: 2004-09-06
#5605403 Posted on: 11/09/2018 11:53 PM
Good performance for hehe and with an old 980ti and 4930k cpu at 1440p
Good performance for hehe and with an old 980ti and 4930k cpu at 1440p
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 188
Joined: 2016-09-08
Just thought I would post some info, my GTX 980 on High settings (which look pretty close to ultra) gets between 80fps and 100fps while running around on the ground and 90 to 120 while flying in a plane in multiplayer, single player performance is lower and is generally 80fps with some dips into 70fps.
Oh and I'm also running my card at 1440mhz core and 7500mhz memory, cause its summer and things get hot here in Australia