MSI GeForce RTX 3050 Gaming X 8G review
ASUS ROG GeForce RTX 3050 STRIX OC review
Palit GeForce RTX 3050 DUAL OC review
Gigabyte RTX 3050 Gaming OC review
ASRock Z690 Taichi review
Radeon RX 6500 XT review
MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
Review average of 17 websites shows 6800 XT to be 7.4% Slower than GeForce RTX 3080
It is always an interesting observation to make when our german colleagues of 3Dcenter take the results of seventeen websites and then average the benchmarks. This round, they've been comparing the RX 6800 series.
The numbers used are based on bigger and popular media like respected colleagues from Computer Base, Igor's Lab, Tom's Hardware, PC Gamer, and Guru3D. Adding up the numbers and 224 result sets from all tests carried out by the websites brings a clearer idea of a graphics card's real performance.
This allows us to compare the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 more, shall we say, normalized manner. On average, the RTX 3080 is 7.4% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 4K. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 8.1% faster than the GeForce RTX 3070. mind you that stuff like DLSS and Raytracing is not included in the results set.
The RX 6800 is 8.1% faster for $579 than the RTX 3070, which costs $ 499. The price difference is 15%, so (based on 4K) the RTX 3070 offers more value based on that metric. The RX 6800 XT costs $ 649 and performing 7.4% less than the RTX 3080, which costs $ 699. The price difference is the same 7.4%, so here that metric is a tie. The RTX cards, however, have Tensor cores and DLSS, as well as faster raytracing. On the other hand, AMD offers 16 GB of graphics memory, a huge plus, coming from the RTX 3070 with 8GB and RTX 3080 with 10GB graphics memory.
| Ultra HD / 4K performance | 1080Ti | 2080Ti | 3070 | 3080 | 3090 | 6800 | 6800XT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture & VRAM | Pascal11GB | Turing11GB | Ampere8GB | Ampere10GB | Ampere24GB | RDNA216GB | RDNA216GB |
| ComputerBase(17 Tests) | 56.6% | 81.1% | 80.1% | 105.9% | 117.6% | 85.5% | 100% |
| Eurogamer(11 Tests) | 53.5% | 81.9% | 79.4% | 105.5% | 119.0% | 87.2% | 100% |
| Golem(10 Tests) | 53.4% | 84.5% | 81.2% | 112.4% | - | 88.7% | 100% |
| Guru3D(14 Tests) | 57.9% | 80.3% | 81.1% | 106.8% | 120.9% | 87.2% | 100% |
| Hardwareluxx(9 Tests) | 57.4% | 83.9% | 80.9% | 110.6% | - | 88.6% | 100% |
| Igor's Lab(10 Tests) | - | 78.2% | 80.0% | 104.9% | 118.9% | 85.9% | 100% |
| KitGuru(14 Tests) | - | 82.2% | 81.3% | 107.0% | - | 88.1% | 100% |
| Le Comptoir du Hardware(20 Tests) | - | 83.4% | 80.2% | 105.6% | - | 86.0% | 100% |
| Les Numeriques(9 Tests) | 57.9% | 81.9% | 81.2% | 109.2% | 120.3% | 87.5% | 100% |
| PC Games Hardware(20 Tests) | 59.1% | 82.5% | 80.9% | 111.3% | 128.6% | 85.6% | 100% |
| PCGamer(8 Tests) | - | 78.5% | 77.9% | 106.9% | 117.6% | 85.6% | 100% |
| PCWorld(12 Tests) | - | 81.2% | 78.2% | 102.7% | - | 85.7% | 100% |
| PurePC(8 Tests) | 55.8% | 80.6% | 81.0% | 108.0% | 121.4% | 86.6% | 100% |
| SweClockers(12 Tests) | 56.2% | 81.7% | 80.5% | 110.7% | 123.7% | 88.2% | 100% |
| TechPowerUp(23 Tests) | 56% | 80% | 80% | 106% | 116% | 87% | 100% |
| TechSpot(18 Tests) | 59.4% | 78.9% | 78.7% | 105.0% | 115.4% | - | 100% |
| Tom's Hardware(9 Tests) | - | 79.6% | 77.4% | 103.3% | 117.2% | 86.2% | 100% |
| Average performance | 56.6% | 81.2% | 80.2% | 107.4% | 120.4% | 86.7% | 100% |
| List Price $ | $ 699 | $ 1199 | $ 499 | $ 699 | $ 1499 | $ 579 | $ 649 |
| TDP (GCP / TBP) | 250W | 260W | 220W | 320W | 350W | 250W | 300W |
Ryzen Mobile 5 4500U-hexacore review appears online - 02/06/2020 10:07 AM
A website in Ukraine posted review of a laptop with a Ryzen 5 4500U online. That would be a non hyper-threading / SMT based hexa-core processor made at 7nm with a TDPof 15W. The chip performs a lot be...
Spanish site posts review AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 04/07/2018 07:51 AM
A Spanish website posted a first review of the Ryzen 7 2700X. Over the past few weeks, several leaks already occurred, now this one. It looks that they did not receive their sample from AMD but like...
Review: Prey in-depth performance review analysis with 20 graphics cards - 06/07/2017 01:39 PM
With drivers and game-patches settled we peek at the game Prey.We'll test the title with 20 graphics cards but also look at platform performance differences in-between AMD Ryzen adn Intel processors....
Review Asustor AS6208T NAS - 07/05/2016 08:36 AM
We test the Asustor AS6208T NAS unit that offers 8 HDD bays. The unit really is a small server offering a wide range of features from advanced RAID functionality, towards Media center output towards L...
AMD Athlon 5350 APU and AM1 Review and test - 04/23/2014 08:09 AM
Low power (25 Watt) and low budget are keywords for this review. We review the AMD Athlon 5350 APU and AM1 Platform with socket FS1b motherboards. This APU is based on AMD's Kabini architecture bring...
SpajdrEX
AMD Vanguard
Posts: 2887
Joined: 2006-05-07
AMD Vanguard
Posts: 2887
Joined: 2006-05-07
#5857254 Posted on: 11/20/2020 06:33 PM
I'm missing information on what CPU they tested, is it Intel or AMD (with SAM enabled)?
I'm missing information on what CPU they tested, is it Intel or AMD (with SAM enabled)?
tuco ramirez
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2020-11-11
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2020-11-11
#5857261 Posted on: 11/20/2020 06:39 PM
Seems pretty accurate since it's for 4k, at 1440p 6800xt is clearly the stronger card though.
Seems pretty accurate since it's for 4k, at 1440p 6800xt is clearly the stronger card though.
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5734
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5734
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5857270 Posted on: 11/20/2020 07:17 PM
You're missing the point. It's purpose is to give the average difference of the gpus using results from various different configurations. However, I'd hazard a guess that the majority of sites would've used Intel in their test setups.
IMHO, SAM is only relevant to new system builders/buyers. For those of us without SAM capability the article is much more representative of the performance we can expect. Make no mistake though, SAM makes a difference and 2% is 2% in my book.
I'm missing information on what CPU they tested, is it Intel or AMD (with SAM enabled)?
You're missing the point. It's purpose is to give the average difference of the gpus using results from various different configurations. However, I'd hazard a guess that the majority of sites would've used Intel in their test setups.
IMHO, SAM is only relevant to new system builders/buyers. For those of us without SAM capability the article is much more representative of the performance we can expect. Make no mistake though, SAM makes a difference and 2% is 2% in my book.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 6167
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 6167
Joined: 2010-10-17
#5857273 Posted on: 11/20/2020 07:28 PM
How do the two compare in price, power consumption, and availability, though?
How do the two compare in price, power consumption, and availability, though?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3605
Joined: 2020-07-24
These tests also show 2080TI > 3070