MSI GeForce RTX 3050 Gaming X 8G review
ASUS ROG GeForce RTX 3050 STRIX OC review
Palit GeForce RTX 3050 DUAL OC review
Gigabyte RTX 3050 Gaming OC review
ASRock Z690 Taichi review
Radeon RX 6500 XT review
MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
Review: ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming
We review the ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming, optimized for Ryzen 2000 / Zen+ on a motherboard with an ATX form factor. Alongside the release of Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X processors, AMD prepped the X470 chipset, that offers a more fine-tuned experience for your Ryzen processor.
Read the review here.
Review: Corsair H100i PRO LCS - 07/19/2018 03:05 PM
The Corsair Hydro Series H100i PRO is the latest iteration in the Hydro PRO series is fitted with a dual-fan 240mm radiator. The i in the naming means it's software controllable with iCUE software. A...
Review: Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB (4x 8GB) 3200 MHz DDR4 - 07/17/2018 10:35 AM
Join us as we test that all new Vengeance Pro RGB DDR4 from Corsair. It's some of the nicest looking and performing memory available on the market today, and each module is built using carefully scre...
Review: ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC5300 router (+AIMesh) - 07/12/2018 09:34 AM
We review the ROG Rapture GT-AC5300 Dual and Triple Band Wi-Fi Router from ASUS, AIMesh ready quad-core processor monster of a router was introduced last year. It offers proper WIFI ranges and perform...
Review: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB SSD - 07/12/2018 09:33 AM
TeamGroup recently announced their Delta RGB series SSDs. While offering value for money and armed with RGB bling, as we learned, these SSDs offer surprisingly good performance. The T-Force Delta RGB ...
Review: GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (96-bit) - 07/06/2018 12:18 PM
Nvidia recently released a new entry-level SKU into the market, a GeForce GTX 1050 with 3GB graphics memory. In this review, we'll confirm if this product really is a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, with less m...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3423
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3423
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5567656 Posted on: 07/24/2018 12:35 PM
Nice review @Hilbert Hagedoorn and spot-on recommendations.
Nice review @Hilbert Hagedoorn and spot-on recommendations.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 6167
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 6167
Joined: 2010-10-17
#5567662 Posted on: 07/24/2018 01:05 PM
That's a fair conclusion. I thought the back panel was a bit bare, personally, like to see more USB than that.
That's a fair conclusion. I thought the back panel was a bit bare, personally, like to see more USB than that.
Jonathanese
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2008-09-01
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2008-09-01
#5567715 Posted on: 07/24/2018 04:26 PM
I had the Z370 version of this board. ASUS makes a great BIOS for overclocking, but they just cut back wayyy too much on the VRMs. At stock clocks with high load-line calibration, I was already seeing the CPU throttle because of VRM temperatures. That simply shouldn't be happening that easily. My 8700K would see ~130W in Prime, but would just keep climbing to over 200W.
I ended up returning it and getting an ASRock Extreme 4 which certainly has a more difficult overclocking interface, but the VRM setup is far more robust. I have a probe between the heatsink and the thermal pad on my VRMs and rarely see it hit 55C. At a 5.2GHz overclock at 1.4v no less. My power usage hangs out at about 170W and doesn't climb.
So the TUF series isn't exactly "TUF". It's a great board for running things stock, or perhaps overclocking 6-core i5s or 4-core i7s. But it feels like they were hoping people wouldn't notice where they cut corners.
Aesthetically, I actually really liked it. Sort of a classic "factory" look that some might find cheesy, but I thought looked pretty good alongside the cleaner look of modern pc components.
I had the Z370 version of this board. ASUS makes a great BIOS for overclocking, but they just cut back wayyy too much on the VRMs. At stock clocks with high load-line calibration, I was already seeing the CPU throttle because of VRM temperatures. That simply shouldn't be happening that easily. My 8700K would see ~130W in Prime, but would just keep climbing to over 200W.
I ended up returning it and getting an ASRock Extreme 4 which certainly has a more difficult overclocking interface, but the VRM setup is far more robust. I have a probe between the heatsink and the thermal pad on my VRMs and rarely see it hit 55C. At a 5.2GHz overclock at 1.4v no less. My power usage hangs out at about 170W and doesn't climb.
So the TUF series isn't exactly "TUF". It's a great board for running things stock, or perhaps overclocking 6-core i5s or 4-core i7s. But it feels like they were hoping people wouldn't notice where they cut corners.
Aesthetically, I actually really liked it. Sort of a classic "factory" look that some might find cheesy, but I thought looked pretty good alongside the cleaner look of modern pc components.
undorich
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: 2016-08-12
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: 2016-08-12
#5567770 Posted on: 07/24/2018 07:51 PM
You get six power phases, -- no way ! looks like a stock 4+2
You get six power phases, -- no way ! looks like a stock 4+2
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 960
Joined: 2009-10-14
As HH touched on this board really is poorly equipped with what is actually the same 4+2 phase supply used on the earlier 350 boards. Those board's VRMs could overheat significantly on a 1700 overclocked running a heavy workload. buildzoid registered temps of 127c in such situations. Combine that with the 2700x being capable of pulling significantly more power in standard configs to the older gen chips and this really does not equate to a power supply setup for a X470 branded board, especially one holding the TUF branding. A very poor move by Asus.
I liked his conclusion - Avoid like the plague...
Obviously if you want to run a lower end Ryzen+ CPU with lower power consumption requirements then this board should be adequate, but you are still paying (lowish) x470 prices for what is Really a 450 board.
(edited for a typo)