Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 2060 STRIX OC

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 01/30/2019 01:48 PM | source: | 43 comment(s)

Join us as we review the new ASUS GeForce RTX 2060 STRIX OC edition. This premium product has already been tweaked the cards towards an 1830 MHz Boost frequency for you, making this a very rather fast offer in the RTX lineup, that looks terrific and familiar as well.

Read the review right here.

Related Stories

Review: Patriot Viper Steel 4000 MHz DDR4 - 01/29/2019 12:36 PM
Today we are reviewing Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 memory. This is a new variant of the Patriot Viper series, which quite surprisingly doesn&rsquo;t have RGB support (unlike the Viper Gaming RGB kit ...

Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 DUAL OC 8G - 01/24/2019 12:58 PM
GeForce RTX 2080 is expensive, so how will a more affordable version behave then? We test the DUAL 8GB OC model from ASUS, that really isn't even half bad. Read the full review here. ...

Review: Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe SSD - 01/22/2019 04:00 PM
Samsung is back with the 970 EVO NVMe SSD, this round they release the Plus edition which makes use of new vertically stacked NAND and a tweaked controller. The end result is a faster writing EVO seri...

Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti LIGHTNING Z - 01/21/2019 02:03 PM
Join us as we review the all new MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti LIGHTNING Z, the beast has been unleashed with highly clocked factory tweaks and a completely new look. That look entails a gorgeous RGB lighti...

Review: Asus STRIX Fusion Wireless Headset - 01/18/2019 11:43 AM
Today, we review the fourth product in the Asus ROG Fusion headset lineup. Sharing the exact same chassis and pedigree as its cousins, the Fusion Wireless naturally boasts the lack of wires feature to...

9 pages « < 6 7 8 9

Fox2232
Senior Member

Posts: 11529
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5636359 Posted on: 02/06/2019 09:48 PM

Anyway, @Hilbert Hagedoorn, I believe reviewers and particularly Guru3d as I care about the best, you should place a time limit in products aging.

I do not find any reason for R9 series, including 3XX and Fury, but also GTX 9 series or earlier to be included anymore. 3-4years time is OK I think.
It is not about time limit. If you have decade of intel's CPUs with minimal improvements each generation, it is reasonable to show that there is very small reason to upgrade.
Same goes for GPUs. Time is bad measurement tool for something considered "old" in technology.

Once GPU is made obsolete by entry level GPU of current Generation, it may be removed from being tested with next generation.
For example, GTX 1050 as entry level performance made quite a few older enthusiast level GPUs obsolete. Those are not needed in comparison with RTX 20X0 series.

And that what falls under lowest of current generation is not needed in graphs once next generation pops in.
= = = =
But real question is: What is current entry-level? $350 RTX 2060 is not (due to its price tag). Is it GTX 1160? Or is there going to be GTX 1150?

With example above, there are 8 cards in Witcher 3 benchmark under GTX 1050 which could be considered obsolete in RTX 20X0 generation.

But if done by time, then manufacturer with greatest number of rebrands gets greatest coverage.
= = = =
That's why I consider reasonable to see last generation entry level GPU (baseline) and anything above it for comparison to current generation.
(Have you seen GTX Titan there? I bet you see value in knowing its performance against R9-390X or GTX 1060/RTX 2060.)

Phamine
Junior Member

Posts: 1
Joined: 2019-04-13

#5659779 Posted on: 04/13/2019 09:01 AM

What thermal paste did you use to replace the stock paste?
Any difference in temps?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone

Posts: 40321
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5659831 Posted on: 04/13/2019 12:46 PM

What thermal paste did you use to replace the stock paste?
Any difference in temps?

Noctua NT-H2, and no, not a single degree.

9 pages « < 6 7 8 9

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.