Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Review: ASRock Radeon RX 6750 XT Phantom
ASRock joins the party as they submitted their Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB, we review the beefed-up Phantom Gaming OC edition with proper cooling, low temps, and low acoustics. Well, that and a nice factory tweak as well of course.
Read the review here.
Review: Lexar NM800 Pro 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD - 08/30/2022 10:02 AM
We review the Lexar NM800 Pro M.2 NVMe SSD, it's one of their fastest SSDs, especially when it comes down to access times and throughput and a PCIe Gen 4.0 controller, this unit offers durability as ...
Review: GEEKOM MiniAir 11 (Celeron N5095) mini PC - 08/26/2022 11:42 AM
There is small, smaller, and even skinny. Geekom has released the new MiniAir 11. A low-power PC that is so compact that you can install it beneath your monitor or even fit it in the palm of your hand...
Review: Asus ROG Swift PG42UQ 138 Hz OLED monitor - 08/24/2022 10:45 AM
In this review, we will be putting the ASUS Rog Swift PG42UQ through its paces. The big one with an OLED panel. The panel itself is said to boast 99% DCI-P3 coverage, 4K resolution, and true 10-bit co...
Review: F1 2022: PC graphics performance analysis - 08/19/2022 01:31 PM
Ferarri or Red Bull? We take a look at F1 2022 from Codemasters, or EA these days, from the standpoint of PC graphics performance and PC gaming. We'll put the game through its paces on the PC platfor...
Review: Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis - 08/17/2022 03:14 PM
This time, we're checking out the Fractal Design Focus 2, a successor of the Focus G chassis (ATX compatible), which we reviewed back in 2017. A Mini version was also available, dedicated to the mATX...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7432
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7432
Joined: 2012-11-10
#6047239 Posted on: 09/01/2022 05:04 PM
I would argue it's completely uninteresting at this price level. It's basically just a finely-tuned 6700 XT (which was already too expensive for what it was) for a hefty $75 increase. I'd rather get a PS5.
If a GPU by itself costs as much or more than a console, I expect it to offer a significantly better experience. The 6750 XT is better but not enough to justify its price IMO.
That's right, the card starts to be very interesting at this price level, good performance, quiet and looking pretty solid all around for 1440p gaming, Might be on my shopping list soon as I don't think the next gen will come at the prices any time this year.
I would argue it's completely uninteresting at this price level. It's basically just a finely-tuned 6700 XT (which was already too expensive for what it was) for a hefty $75 increase. I'd rather get a PS5.
If a GPU by itself costs as much or more than a console, I expect it to offer a significantly better experience. The 6750 XT is better but not enough to justify its price IMO.
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 3456
Joined: 2017-08-18
Senior Member
Posts: 3456
Joined: 2017-08-18
#6047250 Posted on: 09/01/2022 05:50 PM
honestly at this price you can get a 6800 (nonXT) and be better off all the way around.
in some markets the 6800XT is less than the 6800, so if that's the case even better as now you have 144Hz @ 1440p
honestly at this price you can get a 6800 (nonXT) and be better off all the way around.
in some markets the 6800XT is less than the 6800, so if that's the case even better as now you have 144Hz @ 1440p
Fediuld
Senior Member
Posts: 769
Joined: 2016-10-04
Senior Member
Posts: 769
Joined: 2016-10-04
#6047372 Posted on: 09/02/2022 02:34 AM
2019 bought the 5700XT AE, chuck a waterblock on it and keeping it undervolted, only RAM is overclocked mildly.
2022 a $500ish 6750XT (heavily tuned) is barely 20% faster than my 5700XT from 3 years ago at 2560x1440.
At the same time the 5700XT is idling at 8-10W and the 5900X at 4.8-5W. The 6750XT needs 17W while idling! Full blast one card needs 189W the other 268W, 42% more power for 20% more FPS.
Why I think something is wrong here?
2019 bought the 5700XT AE, chuck a waterblock on it and keeping it undervolted, only RAM is overclocked mildly.
2022 a $500ish 6750XT (heavily tuned) is barely 20% faster than my 5700XT from 3 years ago at 2560x1440.
At the same time the 5700XT is idling at 8-10W and the 5900X at 4.8-5W. The 6750XT needs 17W while idling! Full blast one card needs 189W the other 268W, 42% more power for 20% more FPS.
Why I think something is wrong here?
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2008-10-13
Senior Member
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2008-10-13
#6047381 Posted on: 09/02/2022 04:30 AM
I would argue it's completely uninteresting at this price level. It's basically just a finely-tuned 6700 XT (which was already too expensive for what it was) for a hefty $75 increase. I'd rather get a PS5.
If a GPU by itself costs as much or more than a console, I expect it to offer a significantly better experience. The 6750 XT is better but not enough to justify its price IMO.
Then buy a PS5 because you were not gonna buy this card anyways. This card is for anyone who is still rocking a 5600xt or lower and didnt buy a 6600xt or 6700xt already. Even if I had a 5700xt, I would buy it.
2019 bought the 5700XT AE, chuck a waterblock on it and keeping it undervolted, only RAM is overclocked mildly.
2022 a $500ish 6750XT (heavily tuned) is barely 20% faster than my 5700XT from 3 years ago at 2560x1440.
At the same time the 5700XT is idling at 8-10W and the 5900X at 4.8-5W. The 6750XT needs 17W while idling! Full blast one card needs 189W the other 268W, 42% more power for 20% more FPS.
Why I think something is wrong here?
Coming from a 5700xt to a 6800xt, you are kinda of whining. 6700xt was worth the jump from a 5700xt to it at MSRP.
I can tell you right now, no way in hell would I be undervolting with a wateblock. I ran my 5700xt full tilt pulling 250w. Either you live in a shitty place with insanely high electricity cost, or you are obsessed with power consumption numbers.
my 5600x@ 4.5 with 1.192v pulls 43w idle and 6800xt stock settings pulls 35w running a 3840x1080 144hz panel an 1920x480 60hz panel. My monitor pulls 90w just to keep things in perspective.
I would argue it's completely uninteresting at this price level. It's basically just a finely-tuned 6700 XT (which was already too expensive for what it was) for a hefty $75 increase. I'd rather get a PS5.
If a GPU by itself costs as much or more than a console, I expect it to offer a significantly better experience. The 6750 XT is better but not enough to justify its price IMO.
Then buy a PS5 because you were not gonna buy this card anyways. This card is for anyone who is still rocking a 5600xt or lower and didnt buy a 6600xt or 6700xt already. Even if I had a 5700xt, I would buy it.
2019 bought the 5700XT AE, chuck a waterblock on it and keeping it undervolted, only RAM is overclocked mildly.
2022 a $500ish 6750XT (heavily tuned) is barely 20% faster than my 5700XT from 3 years ago at 2560x1440.
At the same time the 5700XT is idling at 8-10W and the 5900X at 4.8-5W. The 6750XT needs 17W while idling! Full blast one card needs 189W the other 268W, 42% more power for 20% more FPS.
Why I think something is wrong here?
Coming from a 5700xt to a 6800xt, you are kinda of whining. 6700xt was worth the jump from a 5700xt to it at MSRP.
I can tell you right now, no way in hell would I be undervolting with a wateblock. I ran my 5700xt full tilt pulling 250w. Either you live in a shitty place with insanely high electricity cost, or you are obsessed with power consumption numbers.
my 5600x@ 4.5 with 1.192v pulls 43w idle and 6800xt stock settings pulls 35w running a 3840x1080 144hz panel an 1920x480 60hz panel. My monitor pulls 90w just to keep things in perspective.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 58
Joined: 2014-12-14
That's right, the card starts to be very interesting at this price level, good performance, quiet and looking pretty solid all around for 1440p gaming, Might be on my shopping list soon as I don't think the next gen will come at the prices any time this year.