GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX White review
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G APU
Vega11 based desktop APUs from AMD are here, in this review we take the Ryzen 5 3400G for a spin. AMD has been going strong with their processors and APUs. But is it all that it is cooked up to be?
Read the review right here.
« Intel's discrete graphics cards will not start at $200 · Review: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G APU
· Gigabyte removes PCIe 4.0 support on all AMD motherboards that are not X570 »
Review: ASUS RoG Swift PG35VQ Monitor - 200 Hz - 512 Local Dimming Zones - 08/02/2019 02:44 PM
In this review, we will take a look at some Ultra Wide slash HDR gaming as we have the ASUS RoG Swift PG35VQ in da house. At 3440 x 1440 pixels, this monitor can manage 200 Hz combined with 'G-sync U...
Review: Corsair SF750 Platinum power supply - 08/01/2019 03:03 PM
We put the new Corsair SF750 Platinum power supply on our test bench today. It’s the most powerful model in the Corsair SF series. The Corsair SF750 Platinum is a small form factor (SFX-L) p...
Review: Toshiba NAS N300 10TB HDD - Storage at 3 Cents per GB - 07/30/2019 10:42 AM
We review among the bigger HDDs available on the market these days, it is the Toshiba NAS N300 that as it implies is intended as 24/7 storage for your small home server or NAS. How well does it stack ...
Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Dual EVO OC Edition - 07/28/2019 12:07 PM
We review the what should be more affordable GeForce RTX 2080 Super Dual EVO OC edition. It's clocked a measly 15 MHz faster over the founders edition, has a reference PCB and custom cooler Will it b...
Review: GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX - 07/24/2019 05:02 PM
We have GALAX in the house, and they brought along their EX edition of the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, NVIDIA has launched graphics cards in their new Super series, as in super-charged. And the RTX 2060 c...
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5698409 Posted on: 08/08/2019 12:35 PM
Would require 7nm I/O die and APU as one chip instead of separate CPU and GPU chiplet.
5700 XT has ~460GB/s available bandwidth for 20 WGPs at around 2GHz.
Let's say 8 WGPs at 1.4GHz for power efficiency... that would be around 128GB/s. Could probably be unhindered even at 100GB/s. But having mere 4GB of dedicated HBM would make all bandwidth concerns go away.
I don't think there's space on an AM4 chip for the 8-core CPU die, a large GPU die, AND a HBM die, unless they can do the stacked thing, or something. Isn't dual-channel high-speed DDR4 *fast enough* for APU GPUs nowdays? You can pull close to 60 GB/s on those things, that's pretty dope.
Would require 7nm I/O die and APU as one chip instead of separate CPU and GPU chiplet.
5700 XT has ~460GB/s available bandwidth for 20 WGPs at around 2GHz.
Let's say 8 WGPs at 1.4GHz for power efficiency... that would be around 128GB/s. Could probably be unhindered even at 100GB/s. But having mere 4GB of dedicated HBM would make all bandwidth concerns go away.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 6357
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 6357
Joined: 2010-10-17
#5698457 Posted on: 08/08/2019 02:29 PM
Would require 7nm I/O die and APU as one chip instead of separate CPU and GPU chiplet.
5700 XT has ~460GB/s available bandwidth for 20 WGPs at around 2GHz.
Let's say 8 WGPs at 1.4GHz for power efficiency... that would be around 128GB/s. Could probably be unhindered even at 100GB/s. But having mere 4GB of dedicated HBM would make all bandwidth concerns go away.
Didn't they propose this years ago but never did anything with it?
Would require 7nm I/O die and APU as one chip instead of separate CPU and GPU chiplet.
5700 XT has ~460GB/s available bandwidth for 20 WGPs at around 2GHz.
Let's say 8 WGPs at 1.4GHz for power efficiency... that would be around 128GB/s. Could probably be unhindered even at 100GB/s. But having mere 4GB of dedicated HBM would make all bandwidth concerns go away.
Didn't they propose this years ago but never did anything with it?
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8398
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8398
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5698614 Posted on: 08/08/2019 11:41 PM
Would require 7nm I/O die and APU as one chip instead of separate CPU and GPU chiplet.
5700 XT has ~460GB/s available bandwidth for 20 WGPs at around 2GHz.
Let's say 8 WGPs at 1.4GHz for power efficiency... that would be around 128GB/s. Could probably be unhindered even at 100GB/s. But having mere 4GB of dedicated HBM would make all bandwidth concerns go away.
I feel like i remember AMD saying they won't utilize the 2nd Zen2 chip area for a GPU at least for Zen 2. I could be wrong though.
Would require 7nm I/O die and APU as one chip instead of separate CPU and GPU chiplet.
5700 XT has ~460GB/s available bandwidth for 20 WGPs at around 2GHz.
Let's say 8 WGPs at 1.4GHz for power efficiency... that would be around 128GB/s. Could probably be unhindered even at 100GB/s. But having mere 4GB of dedicated HBM would make all bandwidth concerns go away.
I feel like i remember AMD saying they won't utilize the 2nd Zen2 chip area for a GPU at least for Zen 2. I could be wrong though.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5698718 Posted on: 08/09/2019 09:39 AM
That's correct, that's why I wrote that it would not be separate chiplet.
I feel like i remember AMD saying they won't utilize the 2nd Zen2 chip area for a GPU at least for Zen 2. I could be wrong though.
That's correct, that's why I wrote that it would not be separate chiplet.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6357
Joined: 2010-10-17
I think that APU with 4C/8T Zen2 and Navi with 8 WGPs would be great entry gaming chip for 1080p. And would win in notebooks. In up to 25W.
High-End APU with 6C/12T Zen2 and Navi with 12 WGPs would just smash 1080p at good details, but it would likely need onboard HBM for iGPU. This would win in up to 45~65W notebooks just due to size.
Apparently, on desktops, higher grade APUs will have to wait for DDR5 even while Navi made improvements in GPU performance vs. required memory bandwidth.
And AMD is about to improve that. Then their I/O die becomes fully enabled chipset. Form Factor will shift.
Funny thing is that it reminds me of Raja Koduri, who after joining intel stated that AMD does not have eco system, software, roadmap, ...
I don't think there's space on an AM4 chip for the 8-core CPU die, a large GPU die, AND a HBM die, unless they can do the stacked thing, or something. Isn't dual-channel high-speed DDR4 *fast enough* for APU GPUs nowdays? You can pull close to 60 GB/s on those things, that's pretty dope.