ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
Review: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB
The 4096 Shader processor enabled Radeon RX Vega 64 with 8GB graphics memory is being reviewed in this article. The new AMD graphics card has arrived, is released and we'll take you through the architecture and the performance numbers. Was it worth the wait?
You can read the full article right here.
Review: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB - 08/14/2017 02:56 PM
We review that Radeon RX Vega 56 with 8GB graphics memory. At 399 bucks this is the what could be affordable AMD graphics card in that new Vega range. It quite honestly might actually be the better pr...
Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
In this article we review the sixteen core and 32 threaded Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. It is the flagship processor and product that will get a 3.4 GHz base frequency with the ability to precision boost...
Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
AMD also releases their Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which we review and test. This this is the 12-core part, the base clock is a notch higher at 3.5 GHz and the precision boost is also 4.0 GHz. With 24 ...
Review: ASUS ROG Zenith X399 Extreme - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
A new thread ripping processor will need to be paired with a proper motherboard, join us in this review of the X399 chipset based ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme. A motherboard loaded with features and high-e...
Review: PrimoChill Praxis WetBench - 08/08/2017 10:27 AM
Chassis you can find in many models and designs, chassis for modding, chassis for the DiY enthusiast and testing however are more scarce. Hence I was looking for an easy to use chassis where we can po...
Evildead666
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2003-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2003-09-14
#5470948 Posted on: 09/11/2017 09:20 AM
Get your head out of your ass, there's nothing innovative about HBM in vega.
Vega 64 is a hot noisy power hog that is as expensive as a 1080ti while being 30-40% slower.
The only moron here is a blatant fanboy who obviously doesn't understand why AMDs gpu division is in the water with vega release and the fact that vega is selling at a loss.
You saying "you feel that innovation is not important to pc development, you are literally a moron" is you pulling words out of your ass because you can't think of any logical comeback.
Clearly i said nothing about innovation not being important.
If you really believe NV is losing marketshare you better look at steam hardware survey. Top 20 is NV not amd
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
Vega64 is still available for 1080 prices.
I'm not sure where you are looking, but look better.
HBM is the future of High end cards, like it or not.
The vega's are really quite good.
The rumour that even the mainstream Vega's will be HBM too surprises me, but not if you take a look at what the market looked like a year or two ago?
HBM was ramping up, and was due to be available 'en masse', but that didn't turn out good, and neiher did their packaging company, that seems to have overstepped itself capacity wise.
It might not be a full on win, but the cards are selling, which is what AMD needs, to get this over with, and get in with the next gen. and the next-next gen.
All thats left for Vega for AMD, is the Drivers.
I'll bet they are working full steam ahead for the next big games releases, likely the New Order II, which has some poster child effects (16-bit precision, etc...).
AMD is innovating in huge steps at the moment.
Nvidia hasn't been, and is still behind in DX12, in comparison to its DX11 performance.
As far as I understand it, all of Nvidia's current lineup of consumer chips are basically DX11 optimised at the hardware level.
We'll see if i'm right (or wrong
) when more DX11/Vulkan games start showing up for the Holiday period.
Get your head out of your ass, there's nothing innovative about HBM in vega.
Vega 64 is a hot noisy power hog that is as expensive as a 1080ti while being 30-40% slower.
The only moron here is a blatant fanboy who obviously doesn't understand why AMDs gpu division is in the water with vega release and the fact that vega is selling at a loss.
You saying "you feel that innovation is not important to pc development, you are literally a moron" is you pulling words out of your ass because you can't think of any logical comeback.
Clearly i said nothing about innovation not being important.
If you really believe NV is losing marketshare you better look at steam hardware survey. Top 20 is NV not amd
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
Vega64 is still available for 1080 prices.
I'm not sure where you are looking, but look better.
HBM is the future of High end cards, like it or not.
The vega's are really quite good.
The rumour that even the mainstream Vega's will be HBM too surprises me, but not if you take a look at what the market looked like a year or two ago?
HBM was ramping up, and was due to be available 'en masse', but that didn't turn out good, and neiher did their packaging company, that seems to have overstepped itself capacity wise.
It might not be a full on win, but the cards are selling, which is what AMD needs, to get this over with, and get in with the next gen. and the next-next gen.
All thats left for Vega for AMD, is the Drivers.
I'll bet they are working full steam ahead for the next big games releases, likely the New Order II, which has some poster child effects (16-bit precision, etc...).
AMD is innovating in huge steps at the moment.
Nvidia hasn't been, and is still behind in DX12, in comparison to its DX11 performance.
As far as I understand it, all of Nvidia's current lineup of consumer chips are basically DX11 optimised at the hardware level.
We'll see if i'm right (or wrong
) when more DX11/Vulkan games start showing up for the Holiday period.
slicer
Senior Member
Posts: 140
Joined: 2015-03-25
Senior Member
Posts: 140
Joined: 2015-03-25
#5627075 Posted on: 01/13/2019 08:55 PM
It baffles my mind how this review got approved?
Here Vega64 loses to GTX1080 by 170p in FireStrike test, i checked the GTX1080 FE review to get the details on FireStrike test physics and combined scores...
-2216 points in Vega64 test on CPU score with SAME hardware vs GTX1080 test.
Did NVIDIA pay You or off or is it just incompetent review'ing- I don't know which is worse?
It baffles my mind how this review got approved?
Here Vega64 loses to GTX1080 by 170p in FireStrike test, i checked the GTX1080 FE review to get the details on FireStrike test physics and combined scores...
-2216 points in Vega64 test on CPU score with SAME hardware vs GTX1080 test.
Did NVIDIA pay You or off or is it just incompetent review'ing- I don't know which is worse?
BlackZero
Senior Member
Posts: 8878
Joined: 2007-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 8878
Joined: 2007-06-17
#5627077 Posted on: 01/13/2019 09:07 PM
It baffles my mind how this review got approved?
Here Vega64 loses to GTX1080 by 170p in FireStrike test, i checked the GTX1080 FE review to get the details on FireStrike test physics and combined scores...
-2216 points in Vega64 test on CPU score with SAME hardware vs GTX1080 test.
Did NVIDIA pay You or off or is it just incompetent review'ing- I don't know which is worse?
Let's not make wild accusations like that. Nvidia drivers have a lower overhead in DX11, which is probably why the difference in CPU scores.
Why not look at Time Spy? It's run in DX12 and should show no variance.
Edit.
Oh, yeah, nearly forgot. Timing of the necro! Got my hopes up at first.
It baffles my mind how this review got approved?
Here Vega64 loses to GTX1080 by 170p in FireStrike test, i checked the GTX1080 FE review to get the details on FireStrike test physics and combined scores...
-2216 points in Vega64 test on CPU score with SAME hardware vs GTX1080 test.
Did NVIDIA pay You or off or is it just incompetent review'ing- I don't know which is worse?
Let's not make wild accusations like that. Nvidia drivers have a lower overhead in DX11, which is probably why the difference in CPU scores.
Why not look at Time Spy? It's run in DX12 and should show no variance.
Edit.
Oh, yeah, nearly forgot. Timing of the necro! Got my hopes up at first.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8286
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8286
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5627162 Posted on: 01/14/2019 06:09 AM
It baffles my mind how this review got approved?
Here Vega64 loses to GTX1080 by 170p in FireStrike test, i checked the GTX1080 FE review to get the details on FireStrike test physics and combined scores...
-2216 points in Vega64 test on CPU score with SAME hardware vs GTX1080 test.
Did NVIDIA pay You or off or is it just incompetent review'ing- I don't know which is worse?
https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/gpu/fs/P/1151/33748?minScore=0&gpuName=AMD%20Radeon%20RX%20Vega%2064&gpuCount=1
https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/gpu/fs/P/1085/500000?minScore=0&gpuName=NVIDIA%20GeForce%20GTX%201080&gpuCount=1
Troll elsewhere.
It baffles my mind how this review got approved?
Here Vega64 loses to GTX1080 by 170p in FireStrike test, i checked the GTX1080 FE review to get the details on FireStrike test physics and combined scores...
-2216 points in Vega64 test on CPU score with SAME hardware vs GTX1080 test.
Did NVIDIA pay You or off or is it just incompetent review'ing- I don't know which is worse?
https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/gpu/fs/P/1151/33748?minScore=0&gpuName=AMD%20Radeon%20RX%20Vega%2064&gpuCount=1
https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search2/gpu/fs/P/1085/500000?minScore=0&gpuName=NVIDIA%20GeForce%20GTX%201080&gpuCount=1
Troll elsewhere.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 17422
Joined: 2012-05-18
Just had a flash, this Vega looks a lot like 7970 vs GTX 680 (GTX1080) and 1080TI being as 780Ti.
That said 7970 got very close to 780Ti later, I think Vega has more room too, but it should have been here now, not 1-2yrs later when its almost irrelevant.