ASUS ROG Swift PG259QN 360Hz Monitor review
ASRock Z590 Taichi review
Zotac GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gaming OC review
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPRO review
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti founder edition review
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X review
Asus ROG Gladius III (wired and wireless) mouse review
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti founder edition review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock OC review
Review: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB
We review that Radeon RX Vega 56 with 8GB graphics memory. At 399 bucks this is the what could be affordable AMD graphics card in that new Vega range. It quite honestly might actually be the better proposition value for money wise.
You can read the full article right here.
Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
In this article we review the sixteen core and 32 threaded Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. It is the flagship processor and product that will get a 3.4 GHz base frequency with the ability to precision boost...
Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
AMD also releases their Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which we review and test. This this is the 12-core part, the base clock is a notch higher at 3.5 GHz and the precision boost is also 4.0 GHz. With 24 ...
Review: ASUS ROG Zenith X399 Extreme - 08/10/2017 03:01 PM
A new thread ripping processor will need to be paired with a proper motherboard, join us in this review of the X399 chipset based ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme. A motherboard loaded with features and high-e...
Review: PrimoChill Praxis WetBench - 08/08/2017 10:27 AM
Chassis you can find in many models and designs, chassis for modding, chassis for the DiY enthusiast and testing however are more scarce. Hence I was looking for an easy to use chassis where we can po...
Preview: Unboxing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X & 1950X - 08/03/2017 03:01 PM
Today we can show you a bit of hardware, and that would be the media kit that AMD has shipped out for review. We have the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X in-da-house, as well as the RIG Zenith X399...
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 13356
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 13356
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5462712 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:29 PM
This definitely seems like the winner of the two cards but it's going to hurt when Nvidia just cuts the pricing on the 1070/1080.
Hopefully 7nm helps Vega next year.
This definitely seems like the winner of the two cards but it's going to hurt when Nvidia just cuts the pricing on the 1070/1080.
Hopefully 7nm helps Vega next year.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 41090
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 41090
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5462717 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:34 PM
No worries mate, it was a colossal screw-up from my side. Fixed now.
The past weeks have been insane, this was pure exhaustion. The 56 arrived on Friday. I hate rushing these things, and the 56 review was that a rushed review.
Thanks, was difficult trying to keep focus on the numbers, eyes being drawn away. (Also, sorry I didn't mean any disrespect).
No worries mate, it was a colossal screw-up from my side. Fixed now.
The past weeks have been insane, this was pure exhaustion. The 56 arrived on Friday. I hate rushing these things, and the 56 review was that a rushed review.
sverek
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5462719 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:36 PM
Unless 56 has hidden potential, its barely better than 379$ msrp 1070.
So, yeah Vega late to party and still doesnt offer much. For 24/7 usage 1070 is hands down better choice.(gaming, etc..)
I am surprised its not disaster after all shenanigas AMD did on events. So at least that works for amd.
Unless 56 has hidden potential, its barely better than 379$ msrp 1070.
So, yeah Vega late to party and still doesnt offer much. For 24/7 usage 1070 is hands down better choice.(gaming, etc..)
I am surprised its not disaster after all shenanigas AMD did on events. So at least that works for amd.
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 485
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 485
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5462723 Posted on: 08/14/2017 03:38 PM
Unless 56 has hidden potential, its barely better than 379$ msrp 1070.
So, yeah Vega late to party and still doesnt offer much. For 24/7 usage 1070 is hands down better choice.(gaming, etc..)
I am surprised its not disaster after all shenanigas AMD did on events.
You can buy 1070s from 440$. Vega56 has a 400$ MSRP, with the AIBs should be around 430-450$, if the miner hysteria doesn't hit the prices like 500-550$. Paired with a Sync monitor, it will be a better choice in both circumstances.
Unless 56 has hidden potential, its barely better than 379$ msrp 1070.
So, yeah Vega late to party and still doesnt offer much. For 24/7 usage 1070 is hands down better choice.(gaming, etc..)
I am surprised its not disaster after all shenanigas AMD did on events.
You can buy 1070s from 440$. Vega56 has a 400$ MSRP, with the AIBs should be around 430-450$, if the miner hysteria doesn't hit the prices like 500-550$. Paired with a Sync monitor, it will be a better choice in both circumstances.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1464
Joined: 2007-01-16
Thanks, was difficult trying to keep focus on the numbers, eyes being drawn away. (Also, sorry I didn't mean any disrespect).
Just read through the article now, I'm actually quite impressed. While it is a shame AMD brought these cards to the party late, they did deliver what they said they would.
Vega 56 performing either at 1070 or between the 1070 and 1080. Vega 64 performance showing it's on the 1080 consistently and no doubt the liquid cooled edition will be between the 1080 and Ti.
We have to remember that when Vega was first announced, it was meant to compete with the 1080, not Titan/1080 Ti, it's community hype that lead to false expectations.
With the features on board Vega though, it will be interesting to see how it will perform over the years to come, assuming games and software make use of such features and, how the impact would be. Will we see a generation difference like what happened between Kepler and Maxwell, how GCN was able to maintain it's performance between the competing generations? Time will tell.