Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 OLED monitor review
ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
Review: AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB
AMD unleashed its mainstream proposition, which we review, the Radeon RX 7600 is aimed at gamers with a Full HD monitor. An 8GB product that is aimed at a low-resolution usage, but is priced $269, will it be worth it?
Read the review here.
« Download: NVIDIA GeForce drivers version 532.03 WHQL · Review: AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB
· Review: MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO »
Review: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (Founders edition) - 05/23/2023 03:08 PM
Our review of the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Founders Edition showcases its performance, making it a proper contender within the mainstream 1080P range. With DLSS3 and Frame generation's added advantages, P...
Review: Corsair 2000D Mini-ITX - PC chassis - 05/23/2023 03:08 PM
Corsair offers a new range of variants for their Mini-ITX PC case, including the 2000D AF Black, 2000D AF White, 2000D RGB AF Black, and 2000D RGB AF White, an ideal choice for small-form-factor build...
Review: ASUS PG27AQDM - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor - 05/19/2023 03:26 PM
We review the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM, this display was designed for gaming at 240 Hz. It has a 27-inch display size and a resolution of 1440p, along with a high refresh rate. The monitor uses OL...
Review: MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi - 05/18/2023 09:01 AM
We review the MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk Wifi, an attractive option with a more competitive price point (around $339). The motherboard boasts an 8-layer PCB, two 8-pin power plugs, and a 14+2+1 power supp...
Review: Mountain Makalu Max mouse - 05/16/2023 04:43 PM
This article reviews the Mountain Makalu Max mouse (with the addition of the Nunatak M mousepad). It is not the first product of this German company that we're checking. Previously it was the keyboar...
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 4845
Joined: 2009-09-08
Senior Member
Posts: 4845
Joined: 2009-09-08
#6135987 Posted on: 05/26/2023 02:38 PM
6800 is nice, but 6800XT can blow it out of the water due to the fact that it's way more overclockable with less constraints on power.
The jump from 67n0XT to 6800 is not very big, but the jump from 6800 to the XT can be a lot bigger.
I've tuned my 6800XT to nearly 6950XT stock performance (for benchmarking), under normal gaming conditions it stays underclocked to save power.
However, that's already two price tiers above the price of the newly launched 7600 or 6700XT, so despite the massive gains in performance (and more memory), some people might simply not have enough money for it.
But if they do, 6800XT is the card to get if looking for long term performance on a reduced budget, until stock runs out. (Yes 6950XT is faster but also more expensive sometimes by over $100... and same memory. Probably not worth paying the extra) *
If that's too pricey, then I agree with the ones above that recommend 6700XT. Best choice at lower price.
In this performance tier, RT is completely irrelevant, so I'm not even considering any of the "cheap" nvidia cards (and 3060 non Ti is the only one that has enough memory, but has too weak core)
*(don't look at the review here at the Performance per Dollar (based on MSRP) page, it's completely pointless, those MSRP prices have not been valid for a long, long time)
That`s very cool but not every card has the same overclocking potential.
My XFX 6950XT can boost to 2800Mhz but my previous Saphire version struggled to break the 2700Mhz barrier.
And my XFX also undervolts much better than the Saphire did.
Not to mention the horrible coil whine from the Saphire card...
All this to say that buying a card while expecting it to overclock/underclock like a champ doesn`t seem a good "bet" to me.
6800 is nice, but 6800XT can blow it out of the water due to the fact that it's way more overclockable with less constraints on power.
The jump from 67n0XT to 6800 is not very big, but the jump from 6800 to the XT can be a lot bigger.
I've tuned my 6800XT to nearly 6950XT stock performance (for benchmarking), under normal gaming conditions it stays underclocked to save power.
However, that's already two price tiers above the price of the newly launched 7600 or 6700XT, so despite the massive gains in performance (and more memory), some people might simply not have enough money for it.
But if they do, 6800XT is the card to get if looking for long term performance on a reduced budget, until stock runs out. (Yes 6950XT is faster but also more expensive sometimes by over $100... and same memory. Probably not worth paying the extra) *
If that's too pricey, then I agree with the ones above that recommend 6700XT. Best choice at lower price.
In this performance tier, RT is completely irrelevant, so I'm not even considering any of the "cheap" nvidia cards (and 3060 non Ti is the only one that has enough memory, but has too weak core)
*(don't look at the review here at the Performance per Dollar (based on MSRP) page, it's completely pointless, those MSRP prices have not been valid for a long, long time)
That`s very cool but not every card has the same overclocking potential.
My XFX 6950XT can boost to 2800Mhz but my previous Saphire version struggled to break the 2700Mhz barrier.
And my XFX also undervolts much better than the Saphire did.
Not to mention the horrible coil whine from the Saphire card...
All this to say that buying a card while expecting it to overclock/underclock like a champ doesn`t seem a good "bet" to me.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 2020-08-03
#6135992 Posted on: 05/26/2023 02:46 PM
https://videocardz.com/newz/some-62pin-power-cables-may-not-fully-fit-into-radeon-rx-7600-reference-card

https://videocardz.com/newz/some-62pin-power-cables-may-not-fully-fit-into-radeon-rx-7600-reference-card

cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 2020-08-03
#6135995 Posted on: 05/26/2023 02:48 PM
6800 is nice, but 6800XT can blow it out of the water due to the fact that it's way more overclockable with less constraints on power.
The jump from 67n0XT to 6800 is not very big, but the jump from 6800 to the XT can be a lot bigger.
I've tuned my 6800XT to nearly 6950XT stock performance (for benchmarking), under normal gaming conditions it stays underclocked to save power.
However, that's already two price tiers above the price of the newly launched 7600 or 6700XT, so despite the massive gains in performance (and more memory), some people might simply not have enough money for it.
But if they do, 6800XT is the card to get if looking for long term performance on a reduced budget, until stock runs out. (Yes 6950XT is faster but also more expensive sometimes by over $100... and same memory. Probably not worth paying the extra) *
If that's too pricey, then I agree with the ones above that recommend 6700XT. Best choice at lower price.
In this performance tier, RT is completely irrelevant, so I'm not even considering any of the "cheap" nvidia cards (and 3060 non Ti is the only one that has enough memory, but has too weak core)
*(don't look at the review here at the Performance per Dollar (based on MSRP) page, it's completely pointless, those MSRP prices have not been valid for a long, long time)
rt runs fine on 6800+fsr or 3060ti + dlss, as long as you don't use every effect at ultra. rtgi + rt reflections will work fine on both. tested and confirmed. enabling shadows or any other third effect might push it a little too far from 60.
6800 is nice, but 6800XT can blow it out of the water due to the fact that it's way more overclockable with less constraints on power.
The jump from 67n0XT to 6800 is not very big, but the jump from 6800 to the XT can be a lot bigger.
I've tuned my 6800XT to nearly 6950XT stock performance (for benchmarking), under normal gaming conditions it stays underclocked to save power.
However, that's already two price tiers above the price of the newly launched 7600 or 6700XT, so despite the massive gains in performance (and more memory), some people might simply not have enough money for it.
But if they do, 6800XT is the card to get if looking for long term performance on a reduced budget, until stock runs out. (Yes 6950XT is faster but also more expensive sometimes by over $100... and same memory. Probably not worth paying the extra) *
If that's too pricey, then I agree with the ones above that recommend 6700XT. Best choice at lower price.
In this performance tier, RT is completely irrelevant, so I'm not even considering any of the "cheap" nvidia cards (and 3060 non Ti is the only one that has enough memory, but has too weak core)
*(don't look at the review here at the Performance per Dollar (based on MSRP) page, it's completely pointless, those MSRP prices have not been valid for a long, long time)
rt runs fine on 6800+fsr or 3060ti + dlss, as long as you don't use every effect at ultra. rtgi + rt reflections will work fine on both. tested and confirmed. enabling shadows or any other third effect might push it a little too far from 60.
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 9922
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 9922
Joined: 2008-01-06
#6136137 Posted on: 05/26/2023 10:54 PM
same guy who made this vid?
18647
yeah...RDOA3 sure is AMD's path to victory
Yea the same guy who also bashed RDNA3 when it launched.
The game guy who leaked Ryzen launch
who leaked chiplet architecture
who leaked 3d cache
who leaked RDNA2 performance, clocks and pricing....
Yea that guy.
same guy who made this vid?
18647
yeah...RDOA3 sure is AMD's path to victory
Yea the same guy who also bashed RDNA3 when it launched.
The game guy who leaked Ryzen launch
who leaked chiplet architecture
who leaked 3d cache
who leaked RDNA2 performance, clocks and pricing....
Yea that guy.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 2020-08-03
didn't know it's that many. so only 1/3rd is non-dlss.