Return rates less than 5% after GeForce GTX 970 VRAM Exposure
The last couple of weeks have been havoc in regards the mess Nvidia created with the GeForce GTX 970 VRAM mess. Over the past few weeks we have been talking with distributors here in the Benelux, and we are hearing that merely a handful of cards are in a return status with the bigger players. John Peddy research however claims this number is as high as 5 %.
Jon Peddie from JPR stated: "I have heard as many as 5 per cent of the buyers are demanding a refund from the AIB suppliers", a quite from Kit-Guru. Retailers are reporting just 1-2%, with two of the UK's biggest retailers offering refunds for the GPU, where they have until the end of this month to box up their GTX 970 and return it. Keep one thing in mind, not all resellers are actually offering the option to return the card, some of them do .. some don't.
So it seems that in the US the return rates are higher opposed to what we are seeing in the EU, and that number includes the regular RMAs as well. If you like to learn more about the VRAM where 3.6 GB is fast memory and the last 512MB is considered a slow partition alongside some down-scaling specs wise, have a peek here.
Percentage wise the Nvidia's reputation, we are sure, has a higher value damage wise.
Posts: 22107
Joined: 2008-07-14
It doesn't matter. You should by law get what is advertised. I still love my NVidia but facts are facts.
For example, if I want to get a microwave made in the USA but instead get a perfectly, equally, good microwave made in China I should be able to return it.
Or if I want a car with a certain powerful engine, but the weight and aerodynamics of the car prevent it from fully taking advantage of that engine. So instead they put in a lower power engine that would perform the same, I should be able to return it.
Is also seems like most people defending the card also own it. Buyers remorse maybe?

Not sure if you can see my sig or not so I'll leave a link below.....but I have no reason to have "buyer's remorse"....
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_summary.php?s=&t=69411
scroll down to the chart of "Top 20 Producers"
BTW, that page is the stats for our Folding@Home team.
So, seeing as how my 7950 averaged 90-115k PPD, and my 970 is averaging 125-165k PPD.....why would I have buyer's remorse? Folding@Home is 90% or more of my usage. I only game 3-4 hours a week, on average.
Senior Member
Posts: 587
Joined: 2007-05-21
It's all about reputation and damage control.
Just ask Brian Williams.
Senior Member
Posts: 22107
Joined: 2008-07-14
It's all about reputation and damage control.
Just ask Brian Williams.
What Brian Williams did was inexcusable. There's no reason he should still have a job at this point.
Senior Member
Posts: 3582
Joined: 2010-01-16
I was joking. I would get a 970 if I could. But that doesn't excuse anything. My examples are still valid. I would take the microwave from China and the car with the slower engine. But you have to be honest about what you are selling.
Posts: 31495
Joined: 2005-01-08
It doesn't matter. You should by law get what is advertised. I still love my NVidia but facts are facts.
For example, if I want to get a microwave made in the USA but instead get a perfectly, equally, good microwave made in China I should be able to return it.
Or if I want a car with a certain powerful engine, but the weight and aerodynamics of the car prevent it from fully taking advantage of that engine. So instead they put in a lower power engine that would perform the same, I should be able to return it.
Is also seems like most people defending the card also own it. Buyers remorse maybe?
Happy customers, more like. Nothing beats a 970 in it's price bracket.