EnGenius ECS2512FP. 8-port 2.5G Cloud Switch review
Deepcool CG560 chassis review
Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN700 NVMe SSD review
Rainbow Six Siege PC System requirements
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege needed a little more time, but that December 1 release date is coming up fast. With that in mind, Ubisoft has released the required PC specs for the upcoming squad-based shooter.
Rainbow Six Siege has been delayed to a December 1 release date. Originally set to release on October 13, Ubisoft has announced it is pushing the release in order to further smooth out and improve several needed adjustments across all gamemodes.
So for those preparing to jump in with friends, here's what your PC will need:
- Windows 7 64-Bit edition, Windows 8.1 64-Bit edition, Windows 10 64-Bit edition
- Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.3 GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 945 @ 3.0 GHz or better
- 6GB RAM or more
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD 5870 (DirectX 11 @ 1GB or better)
- 30GB hard drive space or more
- DirectX 9.0 compatible sound card
Recommended Requirements
The Ubi Blog is also noting that the GeForce GTX460, GTX560, GTX650, GTX750, and the GT900 and Titan Series will be supported. In addition to those Nvidia cards, AMD's Radeon HD5870, HD6870, HD7770, R7 260X, and any AMD card from the R-300 series and Fury X will also work
- Windows 7 SP1 64-Bit edition, Windows 8.1 64-Bit edition, Windows 10 64-Bit edition
- Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8120 @ 3.1 GHz or better
- 8GB RAM or more
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 670/GTX 760/GTX 960 or AMD Radeon HD 7970/R9 280X (DirectX 11 @ 2GB or better)
- 47GB hard drive space or more
- DirectX 9.0 compatible sound card
Tom Clancy Rainbow Six: Siege Has Gone Gold (video) - 11/02/2015 10:07 AM
Ubisoft announced that Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege has gone gold and will launch on December 1st for the Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and PC. The final gameplay trailer in the Inside Rainbow series is ...
Tom Clancy Rainbow Six Siege Gameplay Video - 10/22/2015 09:32 AM
A new trailer from Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs over a minute and shows off gameplay footage from the coming installment in this tactical shooter series ....
Rainbow Six Siege Official - Inside Rainbow #4 Video - 10/14/2015 09:30 AM
Ubisoft has released a new trailer for Rainbow Six Siege. In this new episode of Inside Rainbow, the French company invites players to learn more about the GSG 9 Siege operators, the German counter-te...
Rainbow Six Siege Launches October 13th 2015 - 05/15/2015 03:13 PM
Ubisoft has just announced that Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege will be released on October 13th. In order to celebrate this announcement, the French company has released a new trailer for it that can...
Rainbow Six: Siege - First Public Live Gameplay Video - 08/07/2014 08:38 AM
The Rainbow Six Siege dev team premieres a live gameplay session on Twitch. Community Developer Genevieve Forget and Game Designer Andrew Witts host the first inside look at Ubisoft’s upcomi...
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 17271
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 17271
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5187723 Posted on: 11/12/2015 04:16 AM
More like language packs and redistributables.
Example, FO4 is only 25gb but with all the language packs it's almost 40gb.
Only 25gb? FO3 was 8gb if im not mistaken.. So that 25gb is a lot considering how ****ty it looks.
More like language packs and redistributables.
Example, FO4 is only 25gb but with all the language packs it's almost 40gb.
Only 25gb? FO3 was 8gb if im not mistaken.. So that 25gb is a lot considering how ****ty it looks.
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5187749 Posted on: 11/12/2015 05:53 AM
Fairly normal thesedays for games.
47gb!?!?!
Fairly normal thesedays for games.
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5187750 Posted on: 11/12/2015 05:54 AM
More like language packs and redistributables.
Example, FO4 is only 25gb but with all the language packs it's almost 40gb.
Why would you need all the language packs though?
Note that redistributals are very small in size so it's never that
CS 1.6 is still best you can get today if you look for MP-FPS where skill matters most.
Errr no. Far from it. Arma. CS is arcade and not skill based at all. It's just an arcade shooter with no ADS and not realistic in the slightest. Ping matters more than skill lol
More like language packs and redistributables.
Example, FO4 is only 25gb but with all the language packs it's almost 40gb.
Why would you need all the language packs though?
Note that redistributals are very small in size so it's never that
CS 1.6 is still best you can get today if you look for MP-FPS where skill matters most.
Errr no. Far from it. Arma. CS is arcade and not skill based at all. It's just an arcade shooter with no ADS and not realistic in the slightest. Ping matters more than skill lol
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1813
Joined: 2005-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1813
Joined: 2005-08-12
#5187781 Posted on: 11/12/2015 08:53 AM
Why would you need all the language packs though?
Note that redistributals are very small in size so it's never that
Errr no. Far from it. Arma. CS is arcade and not skill based at all. It's just an arcade shooter with no ADS and not realistic in the slightest. Ping matters more than skill lol
Please, stay away from this style of posting. You're posting your personal opinion about CS Vs Arma as it was a confirmed fact, when in reality you have absolutely no data to support your statement.
Trolling is bad and unwelcome.
Regarding the size of game install, it's difficult to justify it. It's pretty much the size of Battlefield 4. Perhaps they opted for uncompressed audio as in Titanfall, or maybe textures will be much higher resolution than what we've seen so far. Prerendered videos might take so much space, but with no story mode, there won't be many. The rest of the requirements don't look that bad. Yet, this game will require constant 60fps+ rate.
What worries me a lot is that there's a very high risk that without proper balancing or with hardcore team play, but without good communication (as in Brink), the game will die soon. It may be one of the best tactical team shooters when played with clanmates, but I fail to see its value when playing with some random people. I haven't played beta, so perhaps I'm completely wrong.
Why would you need all the language packs though?
Note that redistributals are very small in size so it's never that
Errr no. Far from it. Arma. CS is arcade and not skill based at all. It's just an arcade shooter with no ADS and not realistic in the slightest. Ping matters more than skill lol
Please, stay away from this style of posting. You're posting your personal opinion about CS Vs Arma as it was a confirmed fact, when in reality you have absolutely no data to support your statement.
Trolling is bad and unwelcome.
Regarding the size of game install, it's difficult to justify it. It's pretty much the size of Battlefield 4. Perhaps they opted for uncompressed audio as in Titanfall, or maybe textures will be much higher resolution than what we've seen so far. Prerendered videos might take so much space, but with no story mode, there won't be many. The rest of the requirements don't look that bad. Yet, this game will require constant 60fps+ rate.
What worries me a lot is that there's a very high risk that without proper balancing or with hardcore team play, but without good communication (as in Brink), the game will die soon. It may be one of the best tactical team shooters when played with clanmates, but I fail to see its value when playing with some random people. I haven't played beta, so perhaps I'm completely wrong.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2702
Joined: 2010-01-03
I miss swat 4