AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G Renoir APU review
CORSAIR iCUE LT100 Smart Lighting Towers Review
Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro review
Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
be quiet! Pure Rock 2 review
Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Radeon RX Vega Benchmark Shows 3DMark 11 Performance just above GTX 1080
In the Futuremark online results browser new entries have been spotted for the Radeon RX Vega 3DMark 11. The results show the tested product to be in the GeForce GTX 1080 range.
Radeon RX Vega 3DMark 11 however is not rather good in testing graphics cards in the year 2017, it is a very CPU bound titles these days.
What I found more interesting is that all entries are located under code 687F:C1 8GB. So that is in fact confirmed the Radeon RX Vega as it is the consumer 8GB version. Two other things jump out, the clock and memory speeds are now consistently at 1630 MHz for the GPU clock frequency, with the memory listed at 1890 MHz (HBM2).
The highest score is 31K points. A GTX 1070 scores 25K'ish points, a GTX 1080 (factory overclocked) sits at the 30K marker. Check below a listing that videocardz compiled with some results spread out:
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 3DMark 11 Performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphics Card | Core Clock | Memory Clock | 3DMark 11 GPU Score |
| MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X 8GB (OC) | 1987 MHz | 11064 MHz |
32194
|
| MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X 8GB | 1898 MHz | 10112 MHz |
30400
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #1 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
31873
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #2 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
30681
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #3 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
30632
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #4 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
30618
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #5 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
29346
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #6 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
29046
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #7 | 1630 MHz+ | 1890 MHz |
28107
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #8 | 1630 MHz | 1890 MHz |
27905
|
| 687F:C1 8GB #9 | 1630 MHz | 1890 MHz |
27890
|
| COLORFUL GTX 1070 iGame XTOP 8GB (OC) | 2025 MHz | 9108 MHz |
26530
|
| COLORFUL GTX 1070 iGame XTOP 8GB | 1885 MHz | 8008 MHz |
24540
|
AMD to launch Radeon RX 560D for Asia market - 07/05/2017 07:40 AM
AMD will launch the Radeon RX 560D, a new graphics card for the Chinese market. In essence a simplified Radeo RX 560. Compared with Radeo RX 560, the Radeon RX 560D has 896 streaming processors....
Radeon RX Vega Confirmed launching at SIGGRAPH - 07/03/2017 08:15 AM
In a number of tweets AMD employees have confirmed that they are launching Radeon RX Vega in one month at SIGGRAPH. This qwas already mentioned at the Computex press-release....
First AMD Radeon RX Mining cards Surface Online - 06/27/2017 11:05 AM
The hype in crypto-currency mining is something the Radeon board partners jump onto. See below the first Radeon Mining Edition cards from Sapphire. The models are available in RX 470 and RX 560. Shou...
HIS Launches Radeon RX 560 GREEN iCooler OC 4GB - 06/27/2017 08:14 AM
HIS announces the release of their new Radeon RX 560 graphics card the "HIS RX 560 GREEN iCooler OC 4 GB" (model number: HS-560R4SCNR) which will be available on July 1. The card does not...
MSI Adds Radeon RX 550 2GT LP OC - 06/27/2017 07:58 AM
And the LP in there would be for low Profile. The entry level card is based on Polaris 12 and has 512 Shader processors. These cards feature a 128-bit bus, require no external power connectors, an...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 3236
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 3236
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5449928 Posted on: 07/06/2017 09:41 AM
Looks good, if price is reasonable this should create lots of demand. Question will drop down to:
a) supply
b) will it be a good miner card, if yes we have a problem
c) combination of above 2 may result in prices absurdly higher compared to what Nvidia has to offer, hence people will go for 1080.
other then that looks good, honestly we need competition. And this is pre-release, im curious to see if those will be stock clocks or this is under OC, and how well it will OC under water.
Looks good, if price is reasonable this should create lots of demand. Question will drop down to:
a) supply
b) will it be a good miner card, if yes we have a problem
c) combination of above 2 may result in prices absurdly higher compared to what Nvidia has to offer, hence people will go for 1080.
other then that looks good, honestly we need competition. And this is pre-release, im curious to see if those will be stock clocks or this is under OC, and how well it will OC under water.
eddward
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: 2013-10-01
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: 2013-10-01
#5449931 Posted on: 07/06/2017 09:54 AM
GPU score in 3DMark11 is not CPU bound. It's completely relevant for GPU comparison.
GPU score in 3DMark11 is not CPU bound. It's completely relevant for GPU comparison.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38577
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38577
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5449933 Posted on: 07/06/2017 10:03 AM
You can be pigheaded about it and might like what I write or not, but it is CPU bound due to this title low 720p render resolution versus powerful GPU render capabilities.
GPU score in 3DMark11 is not CPU bound. It's completely relevant for GPU comparison.
You can be pigheaded about it and might like what I write or not, but it is CPU bound due to this title low 720p render resolution versus powerful GPU render capabilities.
robintson
Senior Member
Posts: 423
Joined: 2010-11-08
Senior Member
Posts: 423
Joined: 2010-11-08
#5449934 Posted on: 07/06/2017 10:13 AM
Exactly there is a problem for AMD, they can't make GPU products for Mining only,because whoever buys a GPU for Mining has to use the equipment as long as possible, i.e till next generation of GPU's come out, after that time to sell the one or more years old GPU used for Mining will be much harder.
Why AMD would make A Mining Card and sell it as a Gaming card? They make GPU's for Gaming when IMHO mining is something that lasts for some time, but will not last for long time for sure, as the time will tell.
No problem there they can make gpu versions for mining only and priced same as gaming counterpart so that miners can't sell them to people who want to play but they can sell them for scrap and both sides will be happy but time will tell what it will be.
Exactly there is a problem for AMD, they can't make GPU products for Mining only,because whoever buys a GPU for Mining has to use the equipment as long as possible, i.e till next generation of GPU's come out, after that time to sell the one or more years old GPU used for Mining will be much harder.
Why AMD would make A Mining Card and sell it as a Gaming card? They make GPU's for Gaming when IMHO mining is something that lasts for some time, but will not last for long time for sure, as the time will tell.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: 2016-09-27
If the price is good, I don't see a problem with these numbers.
However, AMD might be tempted to price it higher than 1080ti because of the crazy demand (for mining).
Mining crowd is making things harder for people who just want to game