MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
Radeon RX 470 Benchmarks
In the slide-deck that was released yesterday some benchmark numbers have been, well almost hidden. But they are there. I added them into two charts to check out.
Let me clearly state that the benchmarks have been performed by AMD so we cannot verify quality settings. The scores have been derived from the footnotes of the PDF:
Polaris 10 2.8x performance per watt: Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of May 10, 2016 on the AMD Radeon™ RX 470 (110w) and AMD Radeon™ R9 270X (180w),ona test systemcomprising i7 5960X @ 3.0 GHz 16GB memory, AMD Radeon Software driver 16.20 and Windows 10.. Using 3DMark Fire Strike preset 1080p the scores were 9090 and 5787 respectively. Using Ashes ofthe Singularity 1080P High, the scores were 46 fps and 28.1 fps respectively. Using Hitman 1080p High, the scores were 60 fpsand 27.6 fps respectively. Using Overwatch1080p Max settings, the scoreswere 121 fps and 76 fps respectively. Using Performance/Board power, the resulting average across the 4 different titles was a perf per watt of 2.8X vs the Radeon R9 270X. Test results are not average andmay vary.
Good to see is that they used a test-setup that matches ours:
Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of June 10, 2016 on the Radeon™ RX 480 8GB and R9 380 on a test system comprising Intel i7-5960X, 16GB DDR4-2666 RAM, GigabyteX99-UD4, Radeon Software Crimson Edition 16.1.1, and Win10 64-bit. Using the Steam VR Performance test, Radeon RX 480 scored 6.3 and Radeon R9 380 scored 3.6. Performance may vary based onuse of latest driver versions. Test results are not average and may vary.
BTW theres also mention of a mobile part called AMD Radeon RX 480M based on Polaris 11:
Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of May 10, 2016 on 3DMark 11 and 3DMark Firestrikeusing a test system comprising of an i7-4600M, 8GB, AMD Radeon driver 16.20. AMD Radeon R9 M280X (14CUs) scored 5700 and 3500 with a board power of 82W. AMD Radeon RX 480M (16CUs) scored 7200 and 4070 with a board power of 35W. Using Performance/Board power, the resulting average across the 2 different titles was a perf per watt of 2.8X vs the Radeon R9 M280X .
The RX 470 would use roughly 110W, benchmarks used are 3DMarl FireStrike, Ashes of the Singularity, Hitman and Overwatch. The card is only being compared to a 270X, however FireStrike is normalized and was placed into our regular chart:
Here you go, have a peek:
More Info on Radeon RX 460 - 470 and 480 from new Slide deck - 06/14/2016 07:48 PM
So I just received a new slide-deck from AMD moments ago, in which they tease the Radeon RX 460 - 470 and 480 in a PDF slide-deck. The good news, It's cleared to post these, the bad news it not a lo...
AMD unveiling Radeon RX product stack with 480 - 470 and 460 - 06/14/2016 08:24 AM
AMD has presented they will release two new graphics cards: the RX 470 and RX 460. The two cards are positioned below the previously announced RX 480. Although it is not mentioned, it is rather likely...
SAPPHIRE Radeon RX 480 NITRO 8GB - 06/13/2016 10:15 AM
Some photos of what seems to be SAPPHIRE Radeon RX 480 NITRO 8GB have surfaced on the WWW. The card from Sapphire is their Nitro model and will be a dual-slot dual-fan based product....
AMD Radeon Rx 480 3DMark 11 Performance Benchmark Surfaces #2 - 06/11/2016 07:41 AM
I'll post a little addendum on the news coverage from yesterday where a Radeon Rx 480 3DMark 11 Performance surfaced at futuremark. Yesterday I didn't look too deeply into the database, however eve...
AMD Radeon Rx 480 3DMark 11 Performance Benchmark Surfaces - 06/10/2016 12:53 PM
Yes, I am fairly certain this is the real thing you guys, in the Futuremark database an entry appeared under device ID 67DF:C7, that Hardware ID has been tied to the AMD Radeon RX 480 for a while no...
Aniboom
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: 2015-12-20
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: 2015-12-20
#5289876 Posted on: 06/15/2016 08:22 AM
Holy guacamole! If everything is true, somebody might upgrade to a RX 480 this year.
Holy guacamole! If everything is true, somebody might upgrade to a RX 480 this year.
d_mouse
Senior Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: 2006-05-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: 2006-05-04
#5289881 Posted on: 06/15/2016 08:42 AM
If true the Polaris line up is looking like a good bang for buck option, just hope it's true
If true the Polaris line up is looking like a good bang for buck option, just hope it's true
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 6294
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 6294
Joined: 2010-08-28
#5289892 Posted on: 06/15/2016 09:14 AM
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5265
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5265
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5289900 Posted on: 06/15/2016 09:33 AM
Yeah, I picked-up on this early this morning. I also estimated around R9 290 performance. http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=408103&page=6
Yeah, I picked-up on this early this morning. I also estimated around R9 290 performance. http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=408103&page=6
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 5516
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 5516
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5289906 Posted on: 06/15/2016 09:54 AM
This leak confirms 480 to be around 980 performance.
I hope its true. AMD will dominate mid-high GPU range with this.
This leak confirms 480 to be around 980 performance.
I hope its true. AMD will dominate mid-high GPU range with this.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12264
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 12264
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5289907 Posted on: 06/15/2016 09:55 AM
I didnt expect that level of performance from 470. Seems like a owesome card if it can keep 150$.
I didnt expect that level of performance from 470. Seems like a owesome card if it can keep 150$.
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13547
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13547
Joined: 2005-08-13
#5289910 Posted on: 06/15/2016 09:57 AM
At this point I don't trust anything until Hilbert confirms it with his benchmarks. Would be nice if true and if it reflects the real word gaming performance too.
At this point I don't trust anything until Hilbert confirms it with his benchmarks. Would be nice if true and if it reflects the real word gaming performance too.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1749
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5289922 Posted on: 06/15/2016 10:20 AM
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
No. These cards are meant for people who either can't afford or simply aren't interested in a higher end (more expensive) card like 1070 and upward. It's silly to think 1070 would be some kind of a standard level of performance everybody must have to be able to play their Dota or whatever. You can play 99% of games out there just fine with less power than 1070's, maybe not on uber settings, but play nonetheless.
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
No. These cards are meant for people who either can't afford or simply aren't interested in a higher end (more expensive) card like 1070 and upward. It's silly to think 1070 would be some kind of a standard level of performance everybody must have to be able to play their Dota or whatever. You can play 99% of games out there just fine with less power than 1070's, maybe not on uber settings, but play nonetheless.
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
isidore
Senior Member
Posts: 6192
Joined: 2006-02-01
Senior Member
Posts: 6192
Joined: 2006-02-01
#5289939 Posted on: 06/15/2016 11:10 AM
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
Agree, but i think they will only release an answer to the 1070 at a lower cost, under the name of 480x, which should be a great buy if so.
For high end people, there's the 1080 or future 1080ti/ Vega GPU's.
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
Agree, but i think they will only release an answer to the 1070 at a lower cost, under the name of 480x, which should be a great buy if so.
For high end people, there's the 1080 or future 1080ti/ Vega GPU's.
go4brendon
Senior Member
Posts: 140
Joined: 2015-01-16
Senior Member
Posts: 140
Joined: 2015-01-16
#5289942 Posted on: 06/15/2016 11:15 AM
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
No. These cards are meant for people who either can't afford or simply aren't interested in a higher end (more expensive) card like 1070 and upward. It's silly to think 1070 would be some kind of a standard level of performance everybody must have to be able to play their Dota or whatever. You can play 99% of games out there just fine with less power than 1070's, maybe not on uber settings, but play nonetheless.
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
Hilarious the amount of people on here who believe if you don't have the best there must be something wrong with the product.
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
No. These cards are meant for people who either can't afford or simply aren't interested in a higher end (more expensive) card like 1070 and upward. It's silly to think 1070 would be some kind of a standard level of performance everybody must have to be able to play their Dota or whatever. You can play 99% of games out there just fine with less power than 1070's, maybe not on uber settings, but play nonetheless.
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
Hilarious the amount of people on here who believe if you don't have the best there must be something wrong with the product.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9839
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9839
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5289943 Posted on: 06/15/2016 11:16 AM
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
Forcing? No. It is your choice to buy or not.
At this moment, you can go and buy GTX 980Ti at good price.
What AMD is about to do, is to deliver record bump in performance without greatly inflating price. Quite opposite, isn't it? Price seems rather good.
Polaris is just bit small, entry level desktops and midrange solutions. +What looks like great step on mobile front.
You'll get taste now and you'll be able to approximate Vega. For which you can wait half of a year.
Always your choice.
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
Forcing? No. It is your choice to buy or not.
At this moment, you can go and buy GTX 980Ti at good price.
What AMD is about to do, is to deliver record bump in performance without greatly inflating price. Quite opposite, isn't it? Price seems rather good.
Polaris is just bit small, entry level desktops and midrange solutions. +What looks like great step on mobile front.
You'll get taste now and you'll be able to approximate Vega. For which you can wait half of a year.
Always your choice.
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5265
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5265
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5289947 Posted on: 06/15/2016 11:31 AM
You're actually looking at more money though.
RX 480 8GB crossfire will be roughly £478
GTX1070 is roughly £400, some cheaper, some more expensive.
On the otherhand, it'll probably beat both pascal cards in supported games.
You're actually looking at more money though.
RX 480 8GB crossfire will be roughly £478
GTX1070 is roughly £400, some cheaper, some more expensive.
On the otherhand, it'll probably beat both pascal cards in supported games.
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 5516
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 5516
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5289956 Posted on: 06/15/2016 11:42 AM
edit: nvm.
edit: nvm.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 940
Joined: 2014-11-19
Senior Member
Posts: 940
Joined: 2014-11-19
#5289962 Posted on: 06/15/2016 11:51 AM
We will have to wait for Vega to see higher end GPUs. I do not understand why everyone is comparing these cards to the 1070/1080. They are mainstream gpus.
It seems they some nvidia fans just want a higher cheaper permforming card to force prices down on the 1070/1080.
We will have to wait for Vega to see higher end GPUs. I do not understand why everyone is comparing these cards to the 1070/1080. They are mainstream gpus.
It seems they some nvidia fans just want a higher cheaper permforming card to force prices down on the 1070/1080.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 199
Joined: 2016-04-15
Almost r9 290 performance at 110W and not to mention it should not cost more than $160, seems like a great performer, if it's true.